5 Edges that refuse to die.

In this video, I will show you 5 of the best edges and trading models that you can use as a trader. And I'm not talking about some vague concepts or geometric shapes that I cherry-picked from another chart. I'm talking about 5 repetitive and predictable behaviors that are vastly documented by institutional-level academic research. And they have persistently occurred in financial markets over the last decade. 5 of the so-called structural edges. We are not talking about a short-term inefficiency, but 5 behaviors that are structural because of how the plumbing of financial markets works. And that you, as a trader, could potentially exploit to extract real alpha. Of course, this is not financial advice. It's only for educational purpose. Now, I have been involved in financial markets for multiple years. Some know me as a professional scalper, as I've won multiple podiums in the most famous competition, the Robin's Cup, or in the CME Equity Cup, or because unlike many gurus, I've traded live countless times. And I have literally tried every trading strategy you can name. And I have selected for you both what allow me to build a considerable amount of my wealth, but also the results of years and years and money invested in extensive quantitative research and learning constantly approaches and strategies from hedge fund managers, bank floor traders, and other professionals. Thank you. Here's the 5 models that I will show you: 2 long-term models on the stock market, 1 intraday model on the equities market, 1 option model, and 1 cryptocurrency smart DCA. And you are probably asking yourself, why I need 5 approaches? Shouldn't I choose only one? Because the truth is, unlike retail traders that typically only trust one strategy, one model, and one guru, and basically choose a side Like at the stadium, professionals in finance don't choose side. They just follow the money. And there is many ways to follow the money. If your model stops working tomorrow, what would you do? You may be panic, strategy hop, revenge trading. If instead you use many and diversified models, you will be more independent in changes in market regime and you will get a way smoother equity line. And you will see, the more you will scale in trading profession, the more you will realize how important it is. Just like we are planning in the hedge fund that we are in process of building, to think in terms of Alpha, Beta, and Risk Adjusted Return. So without further ado, let's meet these 5 models. Let's dive deep into my top 5 favorite structural edge. Here we will not talk about Guru, No hope trading, no mentor, just data. Okay. And this is my message to the trading industry. Okay. Instead of trying to replicate the performance of your favorite guru or trust blindly, okay, the strategies that use— the work that you should do, it's called a research and validation process. And these apply to everything. If you are an investor, if you are an intraday trader, if you want to trade stocks, if you want to trade crypto, you should research and you should validate what you are applying. Also because market change, there is one concept called alpha decay. And that's the reason to help you in doing this. I'm providing for free here 5 structural edge that are supported by extensive academic research data and track record from the biggest institutions in the world. Let's start with the first one, the concept of earning surprise drift. The earnings surprise drift, the PAAD, the behavioral underreaction anomaly post-quarterly announcement, is one of the oldest edge in the stock market, and it's proven by a lot of test. Now, this edge here works because there is one concept in the institutions and in the hedge fund called alpha execution. So when you have a sudden change in information in the market, because maybe one stock beat the expectations in the earnings by 2, 3 times, by 40, 50, 60%. Okay. This information needs time to be priced in because the market participants are not willing to suffer a huge amount of slippage. So they will fractionalize their order. And one example of this, one alpha execution method that I was also discussing with Freddy one ex-market maker is Dave Duop. Okay, so they put algorithm in, in the market where they will buy the stocks they are interested in because there was a sudden shift in fundamentals at one specific price. They will accumulate, okay, without rushing and running after the price where you pay a lot of slippage. Okay. And when you have an average filling price, that is not so good. Okay. The earnings surprise drift represents one of the oldest most robust market anomaly. It's firstly documented by Ball and Brown in 1968, and it shows that stocks with high standardized and anticipated earnings continue to drift upward for up to 60 days, while negative surprise stocks drift downwards. Investor anchor to previous estimates suffer from limited attention during busy earnings season, leading to slow information diffusion and delayed price adjustment. Underreaction is reinforced by transaction cost, short sale constraint, negative surprise, small gap, and liquidity limits. These include also slippage, preventing institutional traders from instantly correcting the mispricing. And this is where the edge for retail works. Okay. And this is why it's present for multiple years. So you start with a hypothesis and you build the structural mechanics. Now let's go on this. This is one chart that shows the spread. Okay. For a sample of positive earnings, the good news and the bad news. And as you can see, the stock drift in the direction of the earnings in the next 60 days. This is day 1. This is 60 days. Okay. The spread is relevant. The spread is 4%. Okay. And for 60 days, 4% in a single stock, it's a lot. Specifically, if you also do statistical analysis on the stock that you are picking. If you want to check by yourself, you are a nerd and you want to read, go to check this verified academic research from Kaczmarek and Zaremba, Beyond the Last Surprise: Reviving Post-Earnings Announcement Drift with Machine Learning. This one is beautiful from 2025. And the second one from Bernard and Thomas of the '89, one of the oldest one, Post-Earnings Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response. Let's go on the second edge. The second edge is my favorite. Okay. Everyone knows me for the IVB. I validated this from an institutional perspective with multiple platform, also on Python to show that the stocks have an upside skew and they have a structural drift of the battle of the first 30 minutes. We also received a test and audit from an ex-market maker, Matteo Conti, that did a super extensive test on this behavior and validated this also. By the way, if you want this flowchart, you can click the link in the description because I will share it in the Telegram channel completely for free. The core edge, the initial volume breakout or the initial balance drift. And there is a huge amount of literature also without implementing volume of the opening range breakout. So just using price. Okay. The initial balance represents the high and low price established during the first 30 minutes of a regular cash trading. Volatility contraction during this first half hour often revolves in explosive volume-confirmed directional breakout runs that hold strong predictive power for the rest of the session. Now let's start on the assumption of without considering volume, just considering if the Nasdaq have a structural drift on the upside and if the opening range of the first 30 minutes hold predicted value over the coin flip. And we can see that we have a skew of 13.5%. Okay. So measuring the session after the breakout that close above this breakout, it's already blindly without order flow, without option flow, without logic of the strategy confirmation, 13.5%. Okay. Okay, so with a risk to reward, okay, of 1:1 measuring the same amount, okay, we have a skew of 13.5% of being right just from this valuation. Okay, then I did extensive test also with the quants. We saw how this edge performed in the last 5, 10 years. And now you can take both sides because you can also implement the short side. Okay, that is more strong, but you should be able to analyze the gamma regime because in this one option flow comes really handy. And I gave also the Verified Academy academic literature, the one of Andrea Barbon, Carlo Zaratini, Andrew Hadzitz, A Profitable Day Trading Strategy for the US Equity Markets. The founder of this, Toby Crable, that started with the opening range breakout without implementing volume, but it's already profitable with this logic. And the one of Holberg, Assessing the Profitability of Intraday Opening Range Breakout Strategy. Consider order flow for timing. This is what I do. Getting a direction validated by statistical research and then timing my entry with order flow and option flow for directional pressure. Let's go on the third edge: asymmetrical information and regulatory filing. Politician tracking. Okay. Member of Congress frequently trades stocks in sector directly impacted by committees they sit on. Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi's family portfolio has achieved legendary status, outperforming nearly every hedge fund with 54% gain in 2024 and a 65% gain in 2023. Primarily through leveraged call options on high-growth tech stocks. Now, the hypothesis: key politicians have access to nonpublic, forward-looking information regarding federal contracts, regulatory changes, subsidies, and antitrust decisions before they are made public. Structural mechanics: while the STOCK Act of 2012 mandates trade disclosure within 45 days, copy trading the most active and powerful committee members creates a structural alpha edge. This politician possess asymmetric insight into macroeconomic policy, policy shift like the CHIPS Act or the green energy subsidies. Now, to avoid cherry picking the politician, we test Nancy Pelosi, Brian Higgins, and Mark Green portfolio. And as you can see, we compare these with buy and hold on S&P 500. And you can see the result of this equity line comparing Nancy Pelosi, Brian Higgins, and Mark Green to the S&P 500 results. You can see that Nancy Pelosi is the best performer. Okay. And we can go on the verified academic literature. This one of 2011, Abnormal Return from the Common Stock Investment of Members of the US House. And this is why in 2012 they created the STOCK Act, exactly for what this paper was demonstrating. And the one of Fisher, Talking Stocks of Democracies: Abnormal Returns of High-Profile Members of Congress. This is from 2025. So remember, That the edge are not only price, volume, okay, or data. They can also be informational edge in timing. And this edge can be taken as a structural alpha, even if there is this delay of 45 days between the release of the information and the actual result of the price. Let's go on the next one, the option premium harvesting. And this is also another structural edge. Capitalizing on the systematic volatility risk premium, the VRP. Abstract: Option premium harvesting is the systematic selling of out-of-the-money options to capture the volatility risk premium. The volatility risk premium exists because implied volatility— listen closely— implied volatility IV is structurally higher than ex post realized volatility, the RV. Hypothesis: Implied volatility represents a risk insurance premium that institutional buyers are willing to overpay to hedge their downside risk, allowing option sellers to collect a persistent yield. The risk premium is a structural compensation for taking on tail risk because markets are crash-phobic. Out-of-the-money puts trade at a premium that significantly exceeds their mathematical probability of expiring in the money. Here you can see the test, okay, of the last 12 months of the difference between implied volatility and realized volatility. You will see with your own eyes that realized volatility, it's more often than not lower than implied volatility. And here are two papers that I find amazing. The Karen Wu from 2009, Variance Risk Premia, and the Oleg Bondarenko, Why Are Put Options So Expensive? The last edge, this one is the edge that gave me the most amount of results during the years because it was really early in the blockchain adoption and in the Bitcoin cycle. And now there are a lot of papers that are coming out about the smart DCA on the crypto space. This is the blockchain intelligence model. So optimizing Bitcoin accumulation using the MVRV z-score versus the buy and hold. Now, This one, it's a simplification to make it quantitative. I have my own model that have even better performance than this, that is based on multiple set of mathematical condition before pressing buy and before selling the Bitcoin. A standard buy and hold strategy expose investor to maximum drawdown exceeding 80%. And if you study the retracement from the all-time high of Bitcoin, you know this. The Blockchain Intelligence model use the market value to realize value, the MVRVZ score, to identify macro market cycles and adjust our location size dynamically, buying heavily at capitulation and reducing risk gradually at euphoria. And if you study the biggest portfolio in the market, you will notice that this is exactly how the big whales of the market move. And you can monitor this by checking their holding activity. The hypothesis: public blockchains provide a transparent real-time record of investor cost basis. the realized value. Standardizing the difference between market value and realized value reveals extreme deviation from fair network valuation. Structural mechanic: because Bitcoin lacks traditional cash flow anchors, price cycles are driven entirely by purely behavioral reflexivity. The MVRVZ score standardized this psychological swing, flagging absolute capitulation and extreme euphoria. Empirical equity line: this is the comparison between the dynamic DCA, the one on the MVRV, the static DCA, and the buy and hold approach. And below we can see the Grobbis and Nasman Sandretto 2026, using on-chain data to predict Bitcoin cycles, and the Nasman research paper about using on-chain data to predict cryptocurrency cycles. I hope you find a lot of value in this video. Test these models and let me know if you find any edge. I hope it helps you to realize the importance of diversification. And the importance of starting with an hypothesis. Okay.