Kardec TraderFutures Trader. Creator of The Midas Touch. Mentor

HOW To BEAT Prop Firms (MUST WATCH)🚨

11 Oct 2026 · 1 min

Watch on YouTube

0:34

In this concise tutorial, the speaker outlines a prop‑firm trading methodology that relies on fixed position sizing and a static 1:1.5 risk‑to‑reward ratio. He explains how the evaluation’s $3,000 profit target versus a $2,000 max‑loss limit inherently mirrors a 1:1.5 ratio, meaning that structuring every trade with that same ratio naturally improves the probability of passing because drawdown trails are less likely to breach the loss cap. For funded accounts without a consistency rule, he recommends taking larger 100‑point trades. When a consistency rule is imposed, he advises limiting the number of winning trades and still adhering to the 1:1.5 risk‑reward setup to stay within the rule’s constraints. The overall message is that a disciplined, static risk framework aligns with prop‑firm evaluation mechanics and boosts pass rates.

Chapters

The way I trade prop firms is using static risk and static take profits. A majority of the trades that I take, the risk is going to be 1 to 1.5. This is great for an evaluation. The reason why the evaluation has a $3,000 profit target and then a $2,000 max loss. This in and of itself is a 1 to 1.5. So if you separate your trades into a 1 to 1.5, you're automatically going to have a higher pass rate just because of how the drawdown trails. But then for these funded trades up here, I'm going to choose to take the 100-point trades on funded accounts that don't have consistency rule. When I'm assigned a consistency rule, I'm trying to limit my winners. What I'll do is I'll take a 1 to 1.5 risk to reward. Reward on consistency accounts.