Two trading entry models based on price action and volume. The first uses Fair Value Gaps where price captures liquidity then closes the gap. The second follows a full market cycle: uptrend, reaction, volume break, retest, then entry on a low-volume closing candle.
I use 3 entry models on my strategy. The first one is the fair value gap. What I expect is the price to take some sort of liquidity, have a fair value gap here, and then the price close with volume under that previous fair value gap is invalidating. Actually, the IFV is the new engulfing candle. The second one is the change in state of delivery, and this one I really like a lot because it's a whole cycle. We have to have a trend, uptrend, then the price react in some area. It makes like I take this candle that is going to sell, then it manipulates with volume, it breaks, retest, and when it close with volume or below that, I take my sell positions.
