Kardec Trader argues stocks are more tradable than forex or futures because they move 20-30% on company-specific news, while forex stays flat at 1-2% daily due to bank control. Stocks are inefficient and exploitable.
Why do I stick with stocks and futures and not forex? Because it's going to be a counter intuitive sentence. Stocks are a lot more inefficient than futures and Forex. If you look at forex, Forex is going to move like maybe 1 to 2% every day. When you look at futures on a good day, if there's like a tariff news going on or something, 3 to 4%. But usually if you look at an average, as I mentioned, 10 years on a yearly basis. But 2024, it moved 30% in 2025 because of the market and the tariff news dropped 20% and now you're practically near all time high. That is more what happened with the forex during tariff. I transferred a lot of money from USD to AUD because chart was like this, it dropped like 7%. If there's like a war going on or something, then we are going to see a lot of volatility here in the forex market. But if you look at futures, 20% drop 20% push towards the upside. If you look at stocks, stocks are more susceptible to news and that's why they're inefficient. Like the efficient market won't move a lot. These are the efficient market, like Forex is the most efficient market because it's controlled by the banks all over the world. Because banks are making or losing money on the foreign exchange because of the forex market. So it's going to be very efficient. It's only going to move 1 or 2%. Imagine like forex moving 15% in one day. The banks are going to go bankrupt, the economy is going to be unstable. If Tesla moves like 20, 30%, that doesn't affect the overall global economy.
