A founder cut 40% of her product line and watched profit jump 72% while revenue barely dipped. She went from $68k profit on $2M revenue to $117k profit on $2.86M revenue, and finally paid herself $48k after three years. Fewer SKUs meant higher margins, less inventory, and simpler operations.
Chapters
She got 40% of her products. Revenue dropped 7%, profit jumped 72%. This is the math that changes everything. Revenue isn't the goal. Profit is. And sometimes shrinking to grow is the smartest move you can make. Here's the actual numbers from 12 months later. Before 3 SKUs took 2 million. Revenue, 68k profit, $0 founder salary for 3 consecutive years. And then after 14 SKUs, 2.86 million revenue, 117k profit and then 48k founder salary, her first in 3 years. Revenue dropped 7%. That's the scary headline. But profit increased by 49k, a 72% jump. Here's what happened. The killed SKUs were low margin, losing their revenue cost. Top line, but barely touched profit. The skilled SKUs were high margin. Moving resources to them generated more profit per dollar. Sold fewer SKUs meant lower inventory investment. She freed up 130k in working capital. Less complexity meant lower operational cost, fewer supplier relationships, simpler warehouse operations, cleaner forecasting. She shrank the business on paper, she grew it in reality. Calculate the profit per SKU. Your bottom 20% might be costing you more to keep that. You'd lose by cutting them.