A speaker argues against hoarding information "just in case" and pushes for "just in time" learning instead. The point: consume content only when you need it for something specific, not to stockpile knowledge you might never use.
As far as the learning that can happen, and this is what my next book is about, it's about the information overload. It's finding the difference between just in time information, that's what we want, not just in case information. What do you mean, just in time information? Just in time, whatever your next thing that you're focusing on is within that, your literal next steps, that's what you're focused on. Versus just in case information, which looks like a person who subscribed to 25 different podcasts listens to every episode because of the golden nuggets that they will never put into action, right? How many people read books all the way through and never take any action? What if you read chapter one of Lewis's new book, you took action on that, and then you read chapter two?
Secret Service Agent: Your Neutral Face Is Making People Distrust You (Here's How to Fix It)
