Draymond GreenForward, Golden State Warriors

Draymond's Take On The Wild Ending To Knicks Mavericks Game

22 Nov 2025 · 1 min

Watch on YouTube

0:37

Draymond Green breaks down the Knicks-Mavericks ending where an and-one was nullified by a hook foul and offensive foul. He argues Landry Shamet's off-ball movement forced Brandon Williams into the hook foul, and the initial contact should have been called first to maintain proper officiating logic.

Chapters

Knicks and Mavs ending. It ended pretty much on what would've been an and-one being called, a hook, and an offensive foul, and the Knicks were able to pull the game out. I thought Landry Shamet was riding the driver and kind of created the contact in order to force the hook because he was riding the driver and going off path. But I thought the first foul actually should've been called. You know, as opposed to the hook, like you gotta get the first foul. Even if you say, all right, the basket don't count because of the hook. I just think you have to call the first foul if you're gonna call the second foul because the first foul to me is what creates Brandon Williams to commit the second foul, that is the hook. Extremely wild ending. [FOREIGN LANGUAGE]