Dr. Robert Whitfield found that 29% of explant specimens are contaminated with bacteria. He cites a Danish study on scar tissue biology and argues doctors should routinely test tissue samples to understand each patient's individual response and improve treatment.
Chapters
I think the short answer is, you know, if I've shown that 29% have bacterial contamination, that answers the question why you felt the way you felt. All right, so that's roughly 1 out of 3. And we have this paper that really highlights what's going on at the scar tissue level in this kind of new understanding of you know, DNA, RNA, protein synthesis at the tissue level. So that paper I described from Denmark last summer that came out, I think all of the things are finally kind of aligning to make sense, right? So I already published the largest experience in the world with PCR testing on explant specimens, 29%. Like, I don't care if you don't like me, I don't care if you don't want to listen, like, it's right there. I didn't make it up. It's like, I didn't grasp those numbers out of thin air. And this paper out of Denmark's fascinating. If you told me today that I could go back and do your case and send a little piece and have them tell me like what cell types are, uh, in the highest amounts there producing the most amount of proteins or antibodies or whatever, I would 100% be on board with that every single time to send that for patients so that we, we formed a better, clearer understanding of what's happening at each individual's tissue level because