Short YouTube clip (single speaker) explaining the difference between retinol and retinal, noting that retinals are typically more active because retinols must convert to retinal in the skin. The speaker identifies the product as a retinal–adapalene-precursor complex, criticizes the brand for not listing percentage breakdowns (which would help judge potency/irritation), and invites viewer questions about retinoids.
Chapters
So what do you think of this new retinol? It's not a retinol. It's a retinal. This is a retinol. Retinals are naturally stronger than retinols because retinols get converted to retinals before they become active in the skin. So if you're looking for something stronger than like a 1% retinol, it is a retinal however. However. There's a however. It's a little deceiving because it's not just a retinal, it's a complex. So that means it's a retinal married to something else. And if you look, it's married to an adapalene precursor. The only thing I do not love about this is they don't give you the breakdown of the percent, because sometimes a 1% retinol can be more irritating than a very lightweight retinal. Even though the retinal is more active than a retinol, it doesn't necessarily mean it is stronger. So I wish they gave the breakdown. Let me know if you guys have any questions below about retinols. Retinals, retinoids, retinoins, the whole confusion in the marketplace.