A reviewer getting confused is not a reviewer problem - It's YOURS!

9 Sept 2026 · 2 min
1:52

Stacy L. Chin, a former NIH and NSF SBIR reviewer, says if a reviewer is confused, the problem is your proposal, not their expertise. Reviewers are busy professionals, not specialists. Five practices help: clear headings and white space, surface your innovation early, use figures and tables, highlight key points, and write specifically for the reviewer and funding agency.

Chapters

More from Stacy

4:32
youtube.com

Applying for NIH SBIR in Jan 5, 2027? You Should Be Starting NOW. Here's why...

18h ago
0:45
youtube.com

More SBIR grants? More problems?

1d ago
0:07
youtube.com

If you are a grant writer, you know this feeling

2d ago
16:36
youtube.com

How to Get Invited to Apply for $305K in NSF SBIR Funding || Step-by-Step Guide

2d ago
0:39
youtube.com

I just finished an NIH SBIR grant. That was HARD

3d ago
0:43
youtube.com

It’s time to start 2027 SBIR grants! Here’s why…

5d ago
2:25
youtube.com

$2 million NIH SBIR funding - This one page will make all of the difference

1w ago
4:28
youtube.com

“SBIR Reviewers Don’t Understand My Technology” — Here’s the Real Problem

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

Crazy ideas founders have pitched to me….

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

When grant writing gets interesting..

1w ago
0:18
youtube.com

Can You Pay Yourself With an SBIR Grant?

1w ago
See all content