Stacy L. Chin, a former NIH and NSF SBIR reviewer, says if a reviewer is confused, the problem is your proposal, not their expertise. Reviewers are busy professionals, not specialists. Five practices help: clear headings and white space, surface your innovation early, use figures and tables, highlight key points, and write specifically for the reviewer and funding agency.
Chapters
All right, here's a hot tip. I don't think your SBI reviewer should need a PhD in your technology area to understand why it matters. And this is why: if I have to work really hard to understand why your innovation matters as a reviewer, I think your SBI application is already in trouble. And I see this as a former NIH and NSF SBI reviewer, and as someone who has helped on hundreds of applications. That's because here's something that founders often forget: reviewers are actually people like you and me. They may be reviewing several highly technical applications. While juggling full-time jobs, research, or clinical work and other responsibilities. So technically, it's kind of your job to make sure your SBIR application is as easy to understand. So here's typically 5 ways I like to make my SBIR applications feel more reviewer-friendly. First, make it easy to read since the structure actually matters. Use clear headings, clean formatting, good grammar, and enough white space to let the reviewers move through the applications well. 2, don't bury the innovation. First few minutes, I should understand what you're building, what makes different and why does it matter? 3, use figures and tables strategically because these R&D applications can get dense really fast. A strong visual might explain in seconds what might otherwise take several paragraphs. 4, tell the reviewers what matters the most. Not every sentence deserves equal weight. Use headings, boldings, topic sentences, and structures to guide the attention towards the points you want them to remember. And And 5, write for the reviewer and the agency. Make a case for why the agency should invest federal dollars in your technology. Bottom line, if the founders assume that they know why the innovation matters and the reviewers should too, just don't do that. Connect the dots for them. Make your application easy for them to read. But for you founders applying for an SBIR application, what parts of the applications do you find hardest to make clear? Drop comments below.