SBIR Resubmissions are easier to get awarded?

26 Apr 2026 · 1 min
0:49

In this video segment, Stacy Chin clarifies a common misconception among founders that resubmitting an SBIR proposal gives a better chance of funding simply because reviewers can compare it to the original submission. She explains that reviewers do not see the original application; they only evaluate the new resubmitted proposal alongside the prior reviewer comments. Consequently, the applicant’s sole responsibility is to craft a strong rebuttal summary and substantially improve the entire application. Failure to address previous reviewer feedback can damage credibility, as new reviewers may perceive the applicant as ignoring criticism. Stacy emphasizes that a resubmission is an opportunity to demonstrate responsiveness and improvement, and she advises founders to focus on clear, thorough revisions and a compelling rebuttal to increase funding chances.

Chapters

More from Stacy

4:32
youtube.com

Applying for NIH SBIR in Jan 5, 2027? You Should Be Starting NOW. Here's why...

1d ago
0:45
youtube.com

More SBIR grants? More problems?

1d ago
0:07
youtube.com

If you are a grant writer, you know this feeling

3d ago
16:36
youtube.com

How to Get Invited to Apply for $305K in NSF SBIR Funding || Step-by-Step Guide

3d ago
0:39
youtube.com

I just finished an NIH SBIR grant. That was HARD

4d ago
0:43
youtube.com

It’s time to start 2027 SBIR grants! Here’s why…

6d ago
2:25
youtube.com

$2 million NIH SBIR funding - This one page will make all of the difference

1w ago
4:28
youtube.com

“SBIR Reviewers Don’t Understand My Technology” — Here’s the Real Problem

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

Crazy ideas founders have pitched to me….

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

When grant writing gets interesting..

1w ago
0:18
youtube.com

Can You Pay Yourself With an SBIR Grant?

1w ago
See all content