SBIR/STTR “Success Rates” Are Misleading

8 May 2026 · 1 min
0:47

In this monologue, Stacy L. Chin warns that reported success rates for SBIR/STTR programs are often engineered to look better than they truly are. She explains that while the numbers may not be outright false, firms manipulate them through three common tactics: (1) aggressive pre‑client filtering—using long questionnaires, screening calls, and internal scoring to only accept companies that already appear fundable, which inflates the success metric; (2) selective inclusion—excluding projects that fail to progress or meet certain conditions from the reported data, thereby shrinking the denominator; and (3) outright misrepresentation—stretching or lying about the figures. Chin urges listeners to scrutinize how success rates are calculated, what is counted, and what is omitted, emphasizing that understanding the construction of the percentage is essential for making informed decisions.

Chapters

More from Stacy

4:32
youtube.com

Applying for NIH SBIR in Jan 5, 2027? You Should Be Starting NOW. Here's why...

1d ago
0:45
youtube.com

More SBIR grants? More problems?

1d ago
0:07
youtube.com

If you are a grant writer, you know this feeling

3d ago
16:36
youtube.com

How to Get Invited to Apply for $305K in NSF SBIR Funding || Step-by-Step Guide

3d ago
0:39
youtube.com

I just finished an NIH SBIR grant. That was HARD

4d ago
0:43
youtube.com

It’s time to start 2027 SBIR grants! Here’s why…

6d ago
2:25
youtube.com

$2 million NIH SBIR funding - This one page will make all of the difference

1w ago
4:28
youtube.com

“SBIR Reviewers Don’t Understand My Technology” — Here’s the Real Problem

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

Crazy ideas founders have pitched to me….

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

When grant writing gets interesting..

1w ago
0:18
youtube.com

Can You Pay Yourself With an SBIR Grant?

1w ago
See all content