Shifting from Science to Market Reality

19 Aug 2025 · 1 min
0:37

In this segment, Stacy Chin explains that when moving from academic research to commercialization—especially when applying for SBIR/STTR grants—the evaluation criteria pivot from scientific achievements to market relevance. She emphasizes that laboratory success, high‑profile publications, or citation counts do not guarantee customer interest or a viable business model. Many promising university technologies fail because inventors neglect to validate real‑world use cases or demonstrate market pull. Reviewers fund projects based on commercial potential, not science for its own sake.

Chapters

More from Stacy

4:32
youtube.com

Applying for NIH SBIR in Jan 5, 2027? You Should Be Starting NOW. Here's why...

1d ago
0:45
youtube.com

More SBIR grants? More problems?

1d ago
0:07
youtube.com

If you are a grant writer, you know this feeling

3d ago
16:36
youtube.com

How to Get Invited to Apply for $305K in NSF SBIR Funding || Step-by-Step Guide

3d ago
0:39
youtube.com

I just finished an NIH SBIR grant. That was HARD

4d ago
0:43
youtube.com

It’s time to start 2027 SBIR grants! Here’s why…

6d ago
2:25
youtube.com

$2 million NIH SBIR funding - This one page will make all of the difference

1w ago
4:28
youtube.com

“SBIR Reviewers Don’t Understand My Technology” — Here’s the Real Problem

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

Crazy ideas founders have pitched to me….

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

When grant writing gets interesting..

1w ago
0:18
youtube.com

Can You Pay Yourself With an SBIR Grant?

1w ago
See all content