1:12

In this segment, Stacy Chin explains that many founders lack formal training in grant writing and effective AI prompt engineering, leading to AI-generated proposals that miss reviewers' expectations. She highlights the absence of guidance on crafting strong SBIR applications and the broader challenges in securing non-dilutive funding. Recognizing this gap, she and co‑founder Tim Barnes created Scout, an AI‑powered platform that consolidates decades of grant‑writing expertise to help founders discover suitable grants, develop competitive applications, increase win rates, and manage post‑award compliance.

Chapters

More from Stacy

4:32
youtube.com

Applying for NIH SBIR in Jan 5, 2027? You Should Be Starting NOW. Here's why...

1d ago
0:45
youtube.com

More SBIR grants? More problems?

1d ago
0:07
youtube.com

If you are a grant writer, you know this feeling

3d ago
16:36
youtube.com

How to Get Invited to Apply for $305K in NSF SBIR Funding || Step-by-Step Guide

3d ago
0:39
youtube.com

I just finished an NIH SBIR grant. That was HARD

4d ago
0:43
youtube.com

It’s time to start 2027 SBIR grants! Here’s why…

6d ago
2:25
youtube.com

$2 million NIH SBIR funding - This one page will make all of the difference

1w ago
4:28
youtube.com

“SBIR Reviewers Don’t Understand My Technology” — Here’s the Real Problem

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

Crazy ideas founders have pitched to me….

1w ago
0:11
youtube.com

When grant writing gets interesting..

1w ago
0:18
youtube.com

Can You Pay Yourself With an SBIR Grant?

1w ago
See all content