The article investigates how daily interactions between same‑sex college freshman roommates of the same race versus different races affect emotional experiences, intimacy, and desire for future contact. Using a 15‑day daily‑diary design with 79 randomly assigned roommate dyads (28 cross‑race, 51 same‑race), the authors measured positive and negative emotions, intimacy, desire to live together again, and perceived intimacy‑building (positive) and intimacy‑distancing (negative) behaviors. Analyses employed dyadic growth‑curve models for indistinguishable dyads and mediation models based on West, Popp, & Kenny (2008). Key findings: (1) Mixed‑race dyads reported lower positive emotions and intimacy than same‑race dyads; minority students with White roommates showed a decline in positive emotions over time. (2) Perceived intimacy‑building behaviors mediated the relationship between dyad racial composition and all outcomes (positive mood, intimacy, desire to co‑live), largely eliminating the direct dyad effect. (3) Intimacy‑distancing behaviors also mediated outcomes but to a lesser extent and did not interact with time. (4) Over time, perceived intimacy‑building behaviors declined for White‑minority dyads, especially from the White partner, while intimacy‑distancing remained stable. The discussion links results to Reis & Shaver’s interpersonal process model of intimacy, suggesting that the omission of positive behaviors, rather than the presence of negative ones, drives the poorer experiences in interracial roommate relationships. The authors consider implications for university housing policies, contact theory, and the broader literature on intergroup anxiety and aversive racism, noting limitations such as potential diary reactivity, self‑report bias, and the college context, and calling for longer‑term and more diverse settings in future work.

Topics

Motivation: Daily Interracial Contact as a Stressful Yet Understudied Context

Introduces the practical relevance of everyday interracial interactions (jobs, living arrangements) and the gap in literature regarding longitudinal, naturalistic studies of such contact.

More from Tessa

PDF

tessawsjpub.pdf

3d ago
PDF

2026_Phlegar_TeamsPerformWorseNewcomers.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2023_West_AffectContagion.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2023_Yu_StatusAcuity.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2022_Dumitru_InvestigatingGenderDifferencesTutors.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2021_Thorson_InfluencingPhysiologyDecisionsGroups.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2021_Thorson_PhysiologicalLinkageSuccessfulHighstatus.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2020_Thorson_ControllingUncontrolled.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2019_Thorson_UnderThreatButEngaged.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2018_Stern_AssessingAccuracyCloseRelationships.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2017_West_ContagiousAnxiety.pdf

1w ago
See all content