Language Loss and Identity with Jack Connor

Welcome to The Future of You. Today I'm speaking with Jack Connor, a tech entrepreneur and language enthusiast. His latest project aims to deposit endangered language data into the Arctic Code Vault. The project aims to create AI models of vulnerable languages, ensuring cultural and linguistic heritage is preserved for future generations. In this chat, he highlights the rapid disappearance of languages due to the globalizing, homogenizing effects of the internet and discusses the importance of, and challenges with, language preservation. And how AI is key. We also consider language revitalization, with Jack sharing his own personal experiences. Jack speaks at least 7 languages and has traveled extensively. We also go a bit more sci-fi, envisioning real-time AI-driven auto-translation tools that could alleviate the pressure on major languages in the future. Of course, language and identity are, well, totally interrelated, so that is always at the heart of this conversation. As you listen to this chat, picture Jack in the Arctic, as that is where he will be by the time we go on air. And if you'd like to get in touch, help out with the project by providing audio recordings or even cell phone video for the language deposit, or have any endangered languages or dialects that you care deeply about and want to suggest to him, I'll leave all the details in the show notes. Jack Connor, welcome to The Future of You.

Thank you, thank you for having me on. It's an honour and yeah, great to be here.

That is brilliant to have you here, Jack, because unusually for the guests I have on here, I'm not 100% familiar with your work. I mean, I know about it. Theo Priestley put me in your direction when we were talking about something on Twitter, and I'm so glad he did because your work is absolutely fascinating. And of course, language and the intersection of language and identity is incredibly interesting interesting, nuanced, and complex. So I wonder if we'll start off by you just explaining to the audience who you are and what you're doing and why you're going to the Arctic.

Mm-hmm. Great questions. Great questions. Well, yeah, thanks for the intro. I'm Jack Conner, based in outside Los Angeles, and I'm going to the Arctic to deposit a reel of AI data and language data. It's about 550 languages worth of data. Data into this Arctic code vault that's, you know, impervious to EMPs, is 250 feet below the permafrost. For the listeners and for you, most people are familiar with the Global Seed Vault. It's that for data, and they're literally neighbors. They're right next to each other. It was, it was built as sort of a response to the Global Seed Vault. I'm a language lover. I've always loved languages. I lived abroad a lot when I was a teenager and in my 20s. And as American, this is a little more unusual, I think, and so my background is tech, as a lot of people probably on, like programmer. I was, I was CTO of a couple of different Silicon Valley startups that did pretty good, but I always did language stuff as kind of on the side. The combination of these two is kind of what got me into language preservation of endangered languages. As I continued to work and sort of explore one of the, one of the big topics that I started to take a lot of interest in and didn't see quite so much action around is the fact that languages are disappearing much, much, much faster than at any time in history. This is essentially because of the internet, and it's mostly a good thing. You know, I had coworkers in Brazil who spoke perfect English because they played Counter-Strike all day or watched Netflix all day and could get jobs that paid way higher than local rates, and it was awesome. You know, this is globalization There's pros and cons, but I think there's a lot of good stuff. But one of the negative things is it is quickly pushing out a lot of local languages. We're doing a project in Panama right now with Ngave, which is a language down there that's spoken by about 200,000 speakers. So we're building some tools to put in a hospital there because they have a big translator shortage. You know, people come into the hospital, have a problem, but there's nobody who can do the interpretation work. So we're going to build like an app that has like some text-to-speech and things like that. But it's an example of a language, and 200,000 is actually a lot of speakers, but you have a lot of languages like that where if you're growing up in that culture, is it more valuable to learn English or Spanish, or is it more valuable to learn your, your, you know, your local language? So of course, like English and Spanish, because you can get jobs, you know, things like that. So you just have a lot of pressure on these tiny little niche local languages you know, which there's estimated to be 7,000 in the world. And the pressures, I mean, inherently causing a lot of them to disappear. Uh, here in California, there's, you know, many, many, many indigenous languages, but, you know, 100 years ago there used to be, uh, 5-ish times as much, or, you know, something along those lines. And these days there's, there's also a lot of these languages have, you know, 5 to 20 speakers, and the average age of the native speakers is over 75. This is something that I think most people just don't even think about, for good reason. I mean, you're not— but it's something that's really quickly happening. It hurts me as someone who just loves languages. I have lots of thoughts about, you know, language and how language affects how we, you know, pattern our thinking and things like that. But the other side is, in a more tangible way, we're starting to do very interesting research. We're throwing a bunch of AI at language data and discovering things like, like whole civilizations that we didn't know existed because you, you know, triangulate from etymologies, or, you know, finding out that, you know, for a long time there was, uh, an argument whether Sanskrit and Indo-European, that it was an Indo-European language. Linguists, don't get mad at me if I'm getting this slightly wrong, but basically, you know, trying to figure out was European languages and Sanskrit related. And for a long time people said no, and then found out recently the answer was definitely yes, you know. So there's— we're sort of at this point when we're opening up all these cool, amazing, like, research-oriented, uh, tools we can use languages for. Our languages are starting to disappear.

How do you save or preserve these languages and how do you sort of turn them into data in a format that can be preserved? Talk us through a bit of the details because it's fascinating.

Yeah, yeah. I mean, perfect world, if, you know, if a genie came out of a lamp and said, Jack, like, you can have anything you want with this project, I would have it create an AI of every accent and a ChatGPT clone in every language in the world, and maybe go back in time and, you know, get a ton more. This is never going to happen. So for the preservation is like, for a lot of these little languages, there isn't a lot of things. Have you heard of the disappearing internet theory? It's kind of like a highfalutin sort of title for the fact that essentially just old websites are disappearing.

Oh, Brian Ramell's been tweeting this a lot, hasn't he? Saying like there's 2 million— this was fascinating— there's 2 million academic papers that have just kind of disappeared. So if you're following the footnotes, suddenly you come to like the end because they've been hosted on websites that have disappeared or the actual papers have disappeared. So yeah, is that what you're talking about?

Mm-hmm. Well, with a lot of niche languages, this is a huge problem because a lot of— to give you an example, Here in California, there's a language called Cahuilla. There's a couple variations of it, and there's a revitalization effort going, but it's like teensy tiny little language with, you know, a couple dozen speakers. But if you go and try and find, you know, like grammar books, dictionaries, things like that, there's a couple online and they're being hosted on what is basically a WordPress site being run by a two-person nonprofit. You know, out in the, you know, kind of Joshua Tree Desert. And if that goes— like, if that site goes down, there goes, you know, 85% of, of everything in that language, you know, because there's so, so little data for some of these languages. And so if you're looking on a time frame of, you know, 5 years, it might still be there. 50 years, probably not. Like, 500 years, like really like, who knows. So for some of these small languages, and, you know, I said on this, and this first deposit we're doing is 554 languages worth of data. For some of these, it's just, you know, PDFs of dictionaries, grammar books. Uh, we, we have a partner named Wikitongues who has, uh, probably the biggest collection in the world of niche language audio and video. So if nothing else, you know, if, uh, Tracey Follows, if you you know, if you spoke— were one of the last speakers of, you know, a very niche language. If nothing else, we want to get like audio, some grammar, a dictionary, and then any, you know, basically any like papers or information I could find. You know, huge research project, but for some of these, there's just not much. And most languages are oral languages too, meaning they really haven't left a lot of physical data, but we get what we can, you know, because again, from a, like, a linguist standpoint, it's just— it's important. Like, one of the sad things is if you have an oral language that doesn't really have any written content and the last speaker dies, like, that's it. Like, there's— there is no coming back. It is gone from the face of the earth, and you will never be able to recreate it ever again. So if nothing else, I want to make sure we got representation for that, you know, for those, hence the breadth of this project, because we were able to get, you know, there's a lot of languages where we effectively grabbed everything that was on the internet, but everything that was on the internet is, you know, maybe a couple hundred page PDFs and some white papers from some linguists and stuff like that. But then on the other side, like on the, you know, for some of the languages that have a lot more, have more extensive things, The goal is honestly to build AI so that our children's children's children's children could, be great is they could like, you know, knock on some box and some AI genie pops out and talks to them the way they talk to us, or, you know, some kind of interface or, you know, whatever the case may be. But basically so that they could know, oh, this is what Grandma Tracey sounded like. This is, you know, how language worked back then. And, you know, as an example, if we discovered, a ChatGPT-style LLM in Latin, I mean, it would be the find of the century for many reasons, but from a linguistic standpoint, it would become basically the most important thing that every grad student on the planet would study. All the other stuff that we study would become peripheral to that. So that would be my goal. But, you know, it's very resource-intensive, especially for these non— you know, languages that don't have vast libraries of content. You need to actually collect a lot of data.

But how do you find out where these languages are? I mean, obviously you work in this space, but you must— are you kind of uncovering new or unknown to you languages all the time, or as the world, do we know all the languages, or are there still discoveries in language to make?

Oh, there's so much. And I would challenge everybody out there. I guarantee you there's like some niche languages within 50 miles of you that you have no idea exist. I tell this to people around me in LA, like, I mean, there's, there's half a dozen indigenous languages that are still spoken within 30 miles of Los Angeles. Not, not spoken by lots of people, but there are native speakers and they'll have like, you know, a little museum and there's a, you know, a little bit of government money to kind of keep things rolling. It's just mostly off the radar. And part of that is it's very local. So our organization is focused on preservation, meaning we take— basically, like, we're trying to make, you know, we're trying to save this stuff for the future because the worry is that it's going to get lost, which is, you know, a very strong worry. Most people in this space are actually doing what's called language revitalization, which is where they're trying to teach new generations to speak it. So you have, you know, 5 native speakers now, but trying to increase the number of speakers and bring languages back. This is happening all over the world. Uh, you could think of in, in England, uh, Catalan and, and, uh, Irish are two, you know, excellent examples of where they, you know, kind of brought them back from the brink and now they're effectively like bilingual cultures.

Yeah. Or Welsh actually here.

Oh really? Okay. I didn't, I didn't know quite as much.

I mean, it's not been at the brink, but people are very, you know, as generations get older, they're very keen to make sure that, uh, you know, the signs are in both languages and Welsh keeps being spoken as we move forward.

Yeah. God, I love that stuff so much too. If you walk into a store and it has signs in two languages, I just automatically am like, this is more fun. So this is language revitalization, and this is happening all over the world. There's amazing stories. This happens best at a local level where it's literally just, you know, the elders teaching the kids. And we're going up to the Arctic. One of the things that we're going to do is visit the Sami in like northern, northern Norway. We got invited by a researcher up there and yeah, similar, like it, you know, in the '80s, apparently in the '80s and '90s, the number of Sami speakers was really low. And, you know, earlier it had been kind of like, you know, discouraged and everything. And then apparently these days it's, you know, almost bilingual in a lot of places. But that can only happen through kind of like slow growth and these like education programs and parents that want to like speak it at home and things like that. So that's revitalization and that's amazing. So we're not doing that ourselves, but we work with a lot of groups. I mean, essentially anyone who's doing that, like, we are fully in support of.

Yeah, I think it's so important for identity because this is where the intersection is, I guess, for like the technology and identity and language and society in that if you don't have access to the language, if you believe that language defines reality, then you don't have access to your own history in a sense. So then there's this strange sort of space that we're in which is very present all the time when things are digitized. People aren't quite sure that the future is very uncertain. Some people are better at conceptualizing it than others. But the past, the past is constantly being, particularly in the West, denigrated, sort of challenged. That's fine, but if you're going to lose things from your past, forever, then how does one sort of have any continuity and self-continuity with your past, either sort of individually or as a tribe? Or I mean, you know, in the metaphorical sense, that as a society, as a culture, you can't reach back into the past. And I think this is one of the things that some people are really finding it quite difficult and a challenge to sort of navigate, you know, who are they. If you don't have a strong connection to the past for whatever reason—and language is a really important way of doing it, obviously—then you're a little bit, potentially a little bit lost, um, knowing your place in the world. I don't know if you agree. Oh, totally, 100%.

I mean, I don't think language— I don't go as far to say that language affects, you know, everything about how you think, because there's too much evidence where there's, you know, Spanish speakers who are this way and Spanish speakers who are also that way and stuff like that. But speaking of though, I mean, when I speak Spanish, I personally feel much more extroverted. Maybe that's just a me thing. I don't know. But, you know, a lot of people make observations like that. But I do think there's something to the fact that how you speak and the language you use will affect how you think and kind of certain tendencies that you have. And I also, with you, like, I can only speak for myself personally, but 100%, I think our connections to languages in the past is like a big deal. Like, I, you know, I did 23andMe and found out I'm 75% Irish, and I don't speak any Irish, but it's still, um, it made me much more want to learn Irish. Like, there's such a strong connection between language and culture that to lose that, I mean, it's a little sad, but it's also like, it feels like it's, it's missing a big part. And another big thing with this project too is, you know, these tiny little languages that people— that are in danger of just, you know, kind of poof disappearing off the face of the earth because there's so little presence in the first place. But if you were the person and you found out, uh, oh, turns out like my grandpa was, uh, you know, spoke Luxembourgish, which is a language I actually didn't know existed until a couple weeks ago when we did a, you know, got a little mini library together. And then you went to go be like, "Oh, that's interesting. Let's go look that up." And then, you know, found that there was some information about Luxembourgish. Maybe you don't learn the whole language, but it becomes another piece of kind of this whole stew, you know. It's like knowing your history, like knowing where you came from.

It's an ancestral connection, I think, that once you cut it, you sort of left a little bit adrift potentially. It's so interesting you say that about the internet because the internet does have that capability to sort of flatten everything out. We've talked about this a lot in terms of identity, that it kind of creates this homogeneity and anything that's kind of interesting or very unusual is flung to the side, kind of sidelines, and ends up on the periphery. What do you think the internet specifically is doing to language? I mean, you sort of summarized it there, but what's What's the detail? How does it work? What happens with either an indigenous language or even a language that's not, you know, spoken majorly? What actually is the effect of the internet or our use of the internet?

I think you said it proper, flattening, accent flattening. Accents are disappearing like crazy. People in the States, people in Texas talk a lot like people in California now. So one story is I grew up in Chicago, and Chicago has a really strong accent, and I had a really strong accent. You say Chicago, Chicago. I moved to California, and about the first 6 months, people pointed out my accent all the time, and I made zero effort to get rid of it. I actually liked my Chicago accent. But then after 6 months, people stopped pointing it out. So it's— I just naturally kind of like flattened, you know, sort of probably lost a couple aspects. I definitely stopped saying the word pop and pop machine because people would make fun of me like crazy for saying that for, you know, for a soda. And I think that the internet causes that to happen at large scale. So flattening, and then on the like niche languages, it really disincentivizes. There's a couple places. I mean, you have like your Facebook groups and, you know, there's like in Indigenous language Twitters and all kinds of stuff like that. Like there are places to go, which is great, but I think the overall effect is kind of pressure towards the major languages, putting a lot of pressure towards English here. You know, if you're in Asia, a lot of pressure towards Mandarin, a lot of stuff being done in Mandarin.

I was going to ask you about that. What are the insights about, you know, Asia and Mandarin or what's happening in China? Young people used to be told to, well, learn Mandarin because that's going to be the most useful for you, but I'm not sure that's the case anymore. Because of the potential for even more sort of decoupling between the West and the East. I mean, it's always been America as the superpower speaking English, so that's the major language that everybody automatically learns, but is that the case going forward?

This is a great time for me to make an argument for, for learning a niche language too, because personal experience, I lived in Barcelona for a year. I was a young student skateboarder, loved it. Barcelona is like possibly the greatest city in the world to live when you're like 21 years old. I did not know that most of my courses would be taught in Catalan. And so I had to learn Catalan like really fast. But it was great. I loved it. You know, I tell people that and they're like, ah, what's the point of learning Catalan? You know, there's like a billion Spanish speakers and there's 8 million Catalan speakers or 12, you know, 10 million Catalan speakers. Catalan has been more useful for me in business than Spanish, Italian, and French combined. Because every time I meet someone who speaks Catalan and I can like, you know, have a conversation with them, it's so unusual. And it's also such a kind of like, I mean, there's a bit of a compliment in there and things like that, that it really has like opened doors and stuff. So I would say for people who are trying to decide what language to learn, in response to your question, like, you know, what are the kids being told? Like, You know, French kids back in the day are being told, "Learn English because English is the language," and then 200 years ago everyone's being told, "Learn French because it's the lingua franca. This is the language of international, you know, politics and trade in Europe and everything." I would say don't follow trends. Like, I bet a lot of people learned Mandarin who never went to China, but, you know, did go on vacation to Germany and actually could have benefited from learning a bunch of German, even if it didn't seem like, oh, it was the quote-unquote strategic move. Language isn't really about numbers, it's about meeting individuals. So I honestly, for that question, I tell people like, learn the language you're most interested in, in the place that you're most interested in going, because there'll be way more advantages if you learn a language that you actually use with people than one that you know, as sort of this like theoretical, uh, maybe this will be good for business one day.

About 10 years ago, people were saying, don't learn a language, learn code. Code is the new language. What's your— I mean, obviously you're working in both areas, you are at the intersection of that. What's your point of view on that?

Kind of a weird thing to say in that there's so— there's so— the use cases are so different. I will say language If you can learn to speak French, you can definitely learn JavaScript really easily because it is kind of like a human language but without all of the irregulars. So language people do take to coding like a fish to water. But it's totally different. I mean, they're totally different jobs.

What do you think about these sort of generative AI models that are doing translation on the fly when you've got your avatar and it's— I mean, I don't speak Japanese, but I can easily go and log on to HeyJed and do a little whatever, little presentation, it'll obviously, it claims obviously that it's me speaking Japanese then, but in my own accent. What's your view on these sorts of innovations?

So one is when we make LLMs from these niche languages, the first thing I'm going to do is try and force companies to put it into their software so that, remember how I was talking about the pressure, the internet pressure for major languages? The AI, You know, translation stuff could be the solution to this. For my example, if you are living in Brazil and you speak English so you can get a better job, you know, that's great. But if in 10 years we have some auto translator where you don't need to speak English to do your Jira tasks and talk to your project manager, like, it doesn't matter. You're, you know, you just have it translating for you, all of a sudden that pressure is gone. You don't need to have learned the language. It's handling it for you. And we can argue that, oh, this wouldn't work for sales jobs. And I'm like, well, yeah, it probably wouldn't work for sales jobs because you want to have a personal touch or something. But if you're coding up apps and stuff, I could definitely see a world where this layer of machine translation Again, just takes off this pressure. And then all of a sudden, you don't need to learn English, but maybe you're going to learn your parents' language, you know, or whatever the case may be. So I think that that's a really good thing. And I think that as we start to see this integrated better throughout society, I think we got to the point where like machine translation just hit the still quite crappy but barely acceptable for primetime in some cases. But as we know from technology, that usually means that you're about 5 years from it being pretty damn good. So I really like that aspect of it. And so for example, like if we finished this Navajo LLM, that's one long-range project we're doing, I would love to like put pressure on Netflix to all be like, "Dude, we have a translator." You don't have, you know, the money makes sense, like, go translate your shows right now, you know, that, and again, it's taking the pressure off, it's making more languages available. And I think that you apply this throughout society, and I think it's an awesome thing. My vision for the world is when you walk up to like a McDonald's kiosk or whatever, it has like every language on earth that you can put it in. Not because it's absolutely necessary. Like, I wouldn't argue that's crucial to the functioning of society, but I think it will do a lot to start solving this, this problem. Maybe in some megacities though.

I mean, if megacities do grow, it's like, like 2030, there'll be a third more megacities and they are really populous. Maybe, maybe it's about the context again, maybe the location, you know, you wouldn't have it elsewhere, but maybe in a megacity where people are in and out. All the time from lots of different countries, it would be incredibly efficient. Is your project global in scope?

Oh yeah, yeah. If you took, uh, this deposit we're doing now, or we're going to do in a couple weeks, if you put it on a map, it would be pretty evenly spread with actually a higher concentration in Africa and Latin and South America because there's just a higher concentration of languages. Oh, I wanted to ask you about Africa.

Because obviously if you think about sort of the population trends as well. Obviously the replacement level is so low with the population in the West, but it's really, really high in Africa, something like 7% in Nigeria. So is that— that surely is going to have an effect, isn't it, on the kinds of languages that become the major languages that are spoken, or will they stay, do you think, in their local environment? How do languages sort of move and shift like that?

I mean, this is a question people debate, like why, you know, Why is English the dominant language? Was it because the British, you know, history of colonialism? Or people argue it's because English is inherently better. Like, one fact about English people bring up is English has never not had the highest vocabulary of any language on earth, uh, even before, you know, it was the dominant language. And so there's people who argue there's something inherent to English that causes it to spread which I think is like kind of bullshit personally, but—

I think it's very special and true.

I mean, it's a great lan— but it is, you know, Borges has some famous quote about how English is the language of poetry because there's so many more words you can use to describe things that are, you know, very descriptive and everything. But in terms of population dynamics, one of the reasons there's so many languages in Africa is because there's so much isolationism. I mean, there was obviously trade throughout Africa, but in, in a way, if you found a tribe of people who spoke a language no one had ever heard in England in 2024, it would be fairly shocking. If you found it in the Congo, it would be less so, you know, just because of the nature of the geography and the, the politics and everything. So yeah, languages and isolation, uh, go, go hand in hand. A big question is into our previous thing of if you have, you know, so much, uh, as right now the protests in England, right, about immigration and anti-immigration and anti-anti-immigration or whatever, you know, let's say snap your fingers and England becomes 30% Arabic speaking. What does that mean linguistically? Does it remain English speaking? Does it become bilingual? Do we start teaching Arabic in schools? Does that become just its own subculture where there's— it's more like, oh, there's Arabic private schools and, uh, you know, sort of the equivalent of like Arabic, like, Sunday schools and things like that, but you don't actually like learn? There's a lot of ways these things can go, you know, and authoritarian attempts to tell people how to do language people don't really like being told how to talk. I hate when people try and tell me what words to use and stuff like that. And have you seen like Catalan and Basque and all of these, like the top-down stuff doesn't really—

Even in Ukraine, you know, like banning Russian being spoken, things like that. I mean, I think wherever that kind of happens, it tends to make the population want to speak it more. Just pisses people off. Exactly. Yeah. Because it's an expression of identity.

So that's kind of my take. And then sometimes these things turn into creoles. Maybe in 20, you know, maybe in 50 years you'd have like an English-Arabic new language. Like, who— so I think the ability, I think predicting is, there's too much black swan potential and, you know, too much randomness to make accurate predictions, but enough to make fun predictions. You know, this could happen, that could happen, that could happen.

Yeah, we always love to do our scenarios. Now, tell me, what about non-human language? What about, will I be able to save and then understand or preserve the language of my dogs here?

I hope so. There's a couple articles that came out from Harvard Business Review where they're trying to analyze whale. And I read the paper. I would say that they're, what they're calling whale grammar is a little bit of a stretch. I think it would be good if the aliens came down. Because at least it would put a little humility into us as a species. You know, I think that might be kind of healthy for us to, to not be the only, you know, the only intelligent people around. And I would love to talk to my dog. I think one of the things there, if we could crack that communication— okay, if I can answer the question semi-seriously, I think it would be brilliant because I think we would realize it would, you know, if all human language is between, you know, 5 and 15, it would be interesting to find something that was like at 150, you know, that was still language but was so far outside of what, you know, kind of how we humans think and stuff like that. That it caused, I think it would cause us to rethink a lot. I'm a bit with— I know everyone likes to disprove Chomsky with some good reason. I love the guy. But, you know, not all of his theories have held up, have held up perfectly. But one thing he said that I do agree with is if the aliens came and analyzed human language, they wouldn't say we have 7,000 languages, they would probably say we have One language with 7,000 accents. And I would add on that, that I actually think they would include music as part of the language spectrum. So I argue music came before, came before language. Well, I argue, I think it's almost definitely true, because of the fact that like around the— you could play a sad tone for anyone around the world, they'll recognize it as sad, versus, you know, a happy upbeat, you know, Beach Boys, they might not love it, they might not— it might not be in their wheelhouse, but they would recognize it as like a happy song, you know. So this stuff is built into us. And if you think about like evolutionary terms, you know, birds, things that communicate, all emotional communication is going to be help us as a species over none. So even the ability for me to say I'm sad, I'm happy, you know, to communicate these basic feelings was beneficial. And as far as I can tell, this is the origin of music. Actually, I mean, music is still insanely like mysterious as an art form. I mean, no other art form grabs us as emotionally where you can like literally feel it in your chest.

Yeah, connection to the divine. Yeah. And nobody can explain it beyond that. Are there certain languages that either have existed or still exist that are more inherently more emotional than others? I'm thinking about, you know, when you hear about things like, there's 50 words for snow or— The Inuits. Yeah. The Inuits. Yeah. Are there languages that can't capture certain emotions in the language or certain languages that do have a plethora of different expressions or phrases or words for, to capture a certain emotion? I was just wondering about the kind of continuum is for that.

Oh, absolutely. Lots of languages have that 50 words for snow for something. This is probably the most famous example. Languages that have more colors, i.e., like instead of saying green and blue, but they're like, you know, green, turquoise, aqua, aquamarine, you know, blue, deep blue, you know. But for us, we think green and blue, and then those are kind of subcategories. There's a lot of languages where they just divide things more for whatever reason. And I'm sure like the Alaskan Inuits had that with white. I bet their words for white, you know, they had one to go with each form of snow, right? What has been proven is that they can pick out those colors much, much, much better. You know, if you showed them a color spectrum and said, choose all of the different colors, they could, you know, where us, we would look and just see like, well, I see white. And then I see gray, they could go and say like, this is that kind of white, that's that kind of white, that's that kind of white, that's that kind of white. So if you have a language that emphasizes something, whether it's color, and colors is a really common one, you practice it way more and you get way, way, way, way, way better at it.

Yeah, exactly. You mentioned about aliens earlier, in jest probably, but I mean, Arrival is one of my, well, Top 3 films. Oh my God, I could— I mean, what— I mean, amazing story, amazing storyteller, amazing movie made of the story. But would you think we would be able to communicate with aliens, or are you even looking at that as the sort of what might be the languages of outer space or interstellar languages? Oh, I hope so.

I think one of the things that movie did really well was, uh, point out how different And different in one way where first you're like, oh, they don't, you know, they don't speak the language, they draw the language, you know. And, and there's, uh, if you read a lot of sci-fi, which it sounds like you do, um, you know, there's in science fiction, there's aliens that draw, that use like sense of smell, they emit little pheromones. There's one, you know, that have like little pressure zones, you know, every— everything you could possibly imagine to communicate. Could potentially form a language. So I think that that would be incredible to be the linguistic research project of the century. And then also, back to the way they think, and this is something— I mean, Arrival used the time, essentially, like if you speak their language, you can sort of time jump. Which may be a little extreme, but also I think was a really good, if nothing else, a great metaphor for just like how freaking different like this is gonna get. Like, the aliens came, like, it's not gonna be Star Trek where they come down and we're trying— essentially we're trying to like decode a version of French. It's gonna be like they're gonna come down and do something that we don't understand is even language.

I mean, we talk about language, but communication more broadly could be in any way possible and beyond their imagination, I think. And that's how it's difficult to reach out and try and discover it because you wouldn't know where to start. What kind of way would you go about it? They're not going to speak like us. What haven't we discussed about your project, Jack, that we need to So that more people can sort of follow it. I know you've got a crowdfunder, we did have a crowdfunder. I know you've got investors in it. Where's it going next? What's the timetable for it?

Yeah, all successful. Congratulations. Yeah. Yeah. So in a couple of weeks, we head to the Arctic to do the deposit. We're making a mini documentary about this. It's about endangered languages. I would encourage anyone to just investigate languages in your area. I would bet everybody out there that there's at least one or two tiny little niche languages within a couple hundred miles that they have no idea exists. And for our project, Crowdfunding Language Data, if anybody out there speaks or has access to a small or niche language and would like to provide— I mean, like, literally, like, cell phone selfie videos and stuff. You know, the easiest stuff in the world, but so that we have audio content. So we're always looking for stuff like that. And our partner, Wikitongues, and they're part of like the Wikimedia Foundation and all that. They host these things. So yeah, niche language speakers reach out, language dorks, uh, hit me up on Twitter. Love to talk. And I mean, honestly, thank you for letting me come on and talk about this. Like I said, it's a topic not many people even think about, so being able to kind of get the word out.

No, it's so important because time is the issue with this. We will run out of time. And it's all very well, people are great with these sort of endeavors going, well, we'll do it then, we'll do it then. You've got to do it now, haven't you? It's urgent and important. Absolutely.

And that's what we're trying to do. Well, thank you so much, Tracey Follows.

Not at all, Jack. It's absolutely brilliant to speak to you and fascinating project. And we'll follow it along then on The Future Review. Everyone will follow the progress, and maybe when you come back from the Arctic, you'll come on again and we can, um, you can update everybody how you got on. But we will follow the projects with interest. Thank you so much for your time today. Thank you for listening to The Future Review, hosted by me, Tracey Follows. Be sure to check out the show notes for more info about the topics we covered today. If you If you enjoyed this episode, please like and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. And if you know someone who would love this episode, please share it with them. For more on the future of identity in a digital world, visit futuremade.group/thefutureofyou. To explore the future of everything else, head over to futuremade.group. The Future of You podcast is produced by Big Tent Media.