TJ Walker examines J.D. Vance's attack on Democratic rival Abdul El-Sayed as "very, very evil," arguing it signals political engagement rather than genuine criticism. Walker points to Vance's past calling Trump "cultural heroin" and "reprehensible" before later supporting him, suggesting his harsh rhetoric masks strategic positioning shifts.
Chapters
Vice President J.D. Vance went to Michigan and called Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed very, very evil, but he meant it as a compliment. Liberals ignore J.D. Vance's greatest gift: spotting the true character of political leaders. He once called Donald Trump cultural heroin, noxious, reprehensible. Privately, he wondered whether Trump was a cynical asshole like Nixon or America's Hitler. That's not casual criticism. That is a Yelp review written during an exorcism. And then Vance devoted his career to supporting Trump. So Abdul El-Sayed should not feel insulted. He should start measuring the Oval Office for drapes. If Vance calls you evil Monday, by 2035 he may be behind you at a rally saying, this man alone can save Western civilization I have always believed that, except for every searchable statement. Vance's insults are not attacks. They are political engagement announcements. El-Sayed should update his vision board: White House, Air Force One, and J.D. Vance holding a sign saying, Abdul was right. Ultimize.