Russia Is Getting Cut Off From Global Internet

TJ Walker explains how Russia's government is deliberately shutting down internet access, blocking apps like Telegram and YouTube, and forcing citizens onto a state-controlled super-app. The strategy creates panic: emergency calls fail, people resort to walkie-talkies and cash-only transactions. Walker warns that some U.S. political figures admire Putin's information control model.
Chapters
Ultimize. Imagine living in a country where your internet just turns off, not because of a storm, not because of a technical failure, because the government decided today you don't need it. It's not a glitch, that's a policy. According to the Times, Russia is now periodically shutting down mobile internet, throttling apps in Telegram, and building systems to monitor 100% of all internet traffic. And this isn't theoretical anymore. In Moscow, during a recent emergency, reporters couldn't send photos or video. They had to call in updates like it was the 1990s. Right now in Russia, the government can shut off your mobile internet whenever it wants, no explanation needed. Imagine you're trying to text your family, call a ride, or even check emergency alerts. And suddenly nothing works. That's not a bad signal. That's the government deciding what you're allowed to see, say, and share. That's what life looks like when a country starts controlling communication instead of protecting it. Now, here's the part most people miss, and this is where communication and leadership come in. This isn't chaos. This is logic if If you are an authoritarian leader, this makes perfect sense. If you believe you should rule forever, it makes sense. Then criticism is not feedback, it's a threat. Bad news is not information, it's a danger. Free communication is not a value, it's a weapon that can be used against you. This isn't random censorship, it's a strategy. And it's a big, big problem. We're seeing it every single day in Russia. But guess what? That's not the only place we're seeing it. More in a moment. Hey, if you're enjoying this kind of take and want to hear more stories filtered through the lens of communication, make sure you're following the show, whether you're watching or listening. New episodes drop every single day. And if there's a little notification option where you are now, go ahead and turn it on. It helps you stay in the loop. If you're a leader who wants to stay in power forever, the last thing you want is millions of people freely sharing information and criticizing you. So instead of debating critics, you silence them. Instead of responding to bad news, you block it. Shutting down the internet isn't a failure of leadership for a dictator, it's the plan. And that is exactly what is happening. Russia is blocking foreign apps, slowing platforms like YouTube so they barely function, creating whitelists of approved websites, tracking devices by unique ID numbers, spending millions to block VPNs, the very tools people use to escape censorship. At the same time, they're pushing citizens toward a state-approved super app, a controlled version of the internet where everything can be monitored. This isn't about safety. This is about control. When Russia shuts down apps and internet access, people don't become more loyal. They panic. They switch to cash because payments don't work. They can't call rides, can't send messages, can't get information. Some are even buying walkie-talkies just to stay connected. That's what happens when a modern country suddenly starts acting like communication is optional. Now, here's where it gets even more revealing. Even people inside Russia, including pro-government voices, are pushing back. Officials warned that blocking Telegram could lead to, quote, needless deaths because people rely on it for emergency alerts. Soldiers said they needed to communicate. Citizens are scrambling for VPNs with tens of millions using them, and yet the government keeps tightening control. Why? Because again, the logic is consistent. If your priority is staying in power, you don't optimize for prosperity. You optimize for silence. Here's the real goal of all of this. If people can't communicate freely, they can't organize. If they can't organize, they can't protest. If they can't protest, they can't challenge power. And if they can't challenge power, you stay in charge forever. Now let's zoom out because this is where it becomes deeply disturbing from a US perspective. This is the system Vladimir Putin has built. A country where internet freedom is collapsing, population is shrinking, economic growth is limited, average incomes lag far behind Western nations. This is not a model of success. This is a model of control. And yet there are leaders in the United States, or at least one, who openly admire this, not for the outcomes, but for the power. Think about that. Not admiration for innovation, not admiration for economic success, admiration for a system where one person can control information, silence critics, and stay in power indefinitely. That's not leadership. That's control dressed up as strength. And that's where this story stops being a foreign story, because the real warning isn't about Russia. It's about the mindset. If you start believing that strength means never being questioned, never being challenged, never being criticized, then you are not describing leadership. You're describing control. Putin's system works if your goal is to never lose power, but it comes at a cost: a weaker economy, a shrinking population, a less informed public, a more isolated country. Needless, ridiculous wars, and ultimately a more fragile society. And here's the final irony: the more a leader tries to control information, the more they reveal they're afraid of it. Because truly strong leaders don't silence communication, they compete in it. Now, it's easy as an American to point fingers at Russia, but the problem is our guy in the White House seems to think Putin is his role model. Uh, maybe I've missed it, but it sure seems like Trump is very quick to criticize certainly any Democrat or Biden or Clinton or Obama. Never seems to have any criticism for Putin. Seems to really admire a guy who can crack down on his own people, control all information, start wars anytime he wants, silence critics. And it is profoundly, profoundly troubling, especially so many MAGA types embracing Russia because Putin, you know, prances around without his shirt on. I guess we'll analyze that one another day. Ultimatize.
More from TJ

The Breakout Cases - What Actually Caused Famous Speaking Career Breakthroughs | Ultamize

The Red Circle Sessions Finale - Build the Speaking Career You Came Here For | Ultamize

Two Stages, One Logo, Two Completely Different Realities - Main Stage vs Independent Events | Ult...

Pre-Reset - Why Repetition Builds Better Speaking Decisions | The Red Circle Sessions | Ultamize

Your Decision, Your Framework, and What Happens After - Build Your Speaking Career First | Ultamize

The Red Circle Sessions Trailer - The Speaking Career Truth Nobody on That Stage Will Tell You | ...

The Two-Minute Ultamize Reset - Your Platform, Your Audience, Your Voice | The Red Circle Sessions



