Trump’s Primary Revenge, Iran Cease-Fire Chaos & BBC’s Wrong Guy

Ultimize. According to reporting from the Associated Press, Donald Trump-backed candidates scored major victories in Indiana Republican primaries yesterday, defeating multiple incumbent Republican state senators who had committed the unforgivable sin of refusing to support Trump's congressional redistricting plan. At least 5 incumbent Republican state senators lost to Trump-endorsed challengers after Trump and his allies spent somewhere between $8 and $13 million on races that normally attract less public attention than a middle school chess club election. And that is the real story here, not just that Trump won, not just that MAGA won, but why they won. Because these Republicans who lost, they weren't liberals, they weren't Bernie Sanders fans, they weren't MSNBC contributors. These were conservatives who voted with Trump most of the time and supported his agenda, voted for him. Their real crime? They failed the North Korea-style loyalty test. They supported Trump 99% of the time instead of 100% of the time. And in modern Republican politics, that remaining 1%, or sometimes 0.1%, is apparently punishable by death, political death. Although honestly, if Trump could legally exile them to a salt mine in Siberia, you know, Stephen Miller would already have the paperwork ready. So that's what happened yesterday. That's what was demonstrated. Trump still has a terrifying level of control over the emotional core of the Republican Party. And until that changes, Republicans in Congress are not going to seriously challenge him. Not on wars, not on tariffs, not on economic chaos, not on lying, not on constitutional abuses, not on corruption, not on reckless executive power. Because every Republican politician understands one simple fact: the greatest danger to their career is no longer Democrats. It's Donald Trump waking up angry and typing your name in all caps at 1:47 in the morning. That's the political system now. We basically replaced the Founding Fathers' constitutional republic with a Yelp review system run by a furious casino owner from New Jersey. Two stars, weak on loyalty, sad. And suddenly some state senator in Indiana loses a 20-year political career. No doubt about it, that's extraordinary political power. And honestly, you have to acknowledge it whether you love Trump or hate him. Most presidents can't get Americans to care about complicated federal legislation. Trump got Republican primary voters emotionally invested in state Senate races over redistricting maps. Now, most Americans couldn't name their own state senator if their life depended on it. If you stopped random people outside Walmart and asked, "Who represents your district in the Indiana State Senate, or your state Senate?" Half of them would say, uh, I don't know, is that one of the judges on The Voice? But Trump nationalized these races. He turned obscure local politicians into enemies of the revolution, enemies of the state. And the results were brutal. Veteran Republican lawmakers like Jim Buck, Travis Holtman, Greg Walker, Linda Rogers, and Dan Durnell were taken out. After opposing Trump's redistricting push. One of the defeated Republicans, Travis Holden, basically admitted afterwards, "Yeah, I voted how my constituents wanted, and it cost me my job." That sentence should terrify anyone who still thinks this is normal Democratic politics, because representative government is supposed to work like this: my constituents wanted X, so I voted for X. But in MAGA politics, it works like this: my constituents wanted X, but dear leader wanted Y, and dear leader wins every time. That's not conservatism anymore, that's court politics. It's medieval monarchy behavior. Trump has essentially transformed parts of the Republican Party into Versailles with pickup trucks. Every Republican politician spends half their day trying to figure out, how do I survive without accidentally offending the king? And the craziest part is Trump doesn't even necessarily need the majority of Republicans anymore. That's the misunderstanding Democrats constantly make. They keep looking at polls showing Trump losing suburban voters or moderate conservatives and think, aha, MAGA is collapsing. Well, no, not exactly, because the people leaving the movement are often the less obsessive voters, the less emotional voters, the less politically engaged voters. Trump still dominates the people who treat politics like a blood sport and religion combined, and in primaries, those are the voters who matter most. Primary voters are the political equivalent of fantasy football addicts. They're not casual participants. There are people who know obscure state legislators the way normal people know Marvel characters. Actually, Senator Greg Walker betrayed the movement during the December redistricting conflict. Sir, your children don't know your birthday, but you've memorized Indiana State Senate voting records. That's the intensity Trump commands, and until that emotional hold weakens, Republicans will continue behaving the way cult members behave around a charismatic leader, because that's really what this is all about: fear. Fear of exile, fear of public humiliation, fear of being labeled a RINO, fear of losing a primary, fear of ending up like Liz Cheney wandering the wilderness giving speeches at universities while half the Republican Party acts like she died in 2019. And honestly, there's a deeper philosophical point here that goes beyond Trump. Human beings consistently crave strongman figures during periods of chaos and uncertainty. This isn't uniquely American. It's not uniquely Republican. It's human nature. A lot of people don't actually want democracy in the abstract. They want certainty. They want emotional reassurance. They want somebody loud and confident telling them, "I alone can fix this," even if the guy saying it has the temperament of a drunk uncle arguing with a ceiling fan at Applebee's. That's the eternal danger of populism. The strongman becomes larger than institutions, larger than ideology, larger than facts, larger than the party itself. And Trump absolutely still has that magic with millions of Republicans. But here's what I think— it's where the story gets interesting. I also think you can feel the limits approaching. Okay, certainly wasn't yesterday, not today, maybe not tomorrow, but it's approaching because Trump has unquestionably lost a large chunk of conservatives over the years— business conservatives, suburban conservatives, traditional Republicans, older Republicans exhausted by all the chaos. Younger conservatives embarrassed by the conspiracy culture. There are millions of Republicans now who still dislike Democrats, don't get me wrong, still support conservative policies, but no longer emotionally worship Trump. That matters. The problem for Republicans is that Trump still controls enough of the activist base to terrify elected officials. But what happens if that number shrinks just a little more? What happens when fear stops working? Because authoritarian-style political movements always depend on one thing above all: the illusion of invincibility. The minute people believe the strongman can lose, the spell begins breaking. And I think we may be getting close to that threshold. It may be wishful thinking, I'll grant you that. Not because Trump suddenly became less charismatic, not because Democrats suddenly became geniuses, certainly not because cable news panels discouraged or discovered courage, no, but because exhaustion eventually catches up to every political movement built entirely around one man's dominance. At some point, even loyal followers start thinking, okay, Are we gonna spend the next 15 years screaming about loyalty tests and reposting memes of Trump's face on Rambo's body? Really? Because eventually even cults run out of energy. And I think that's the question quietly hovering over Republican politics now. Not can Trump destroy careers? Well, clearly he can. Yesterday proved that. The bigger question is How many more years can he maintain this emotional chokehold before enough Republicans decide they want a political movement instead of a permanent hostage situation? Now, yesterday's election proved something Democrats desperately do not want to admit. Donald Trump still owns the emotional core of the Republican Party. This man got voters fired up over Indiana state Senate races. Most Americans don't even know who their state senator is. You ask people at Walmart who represents them, half of them would say, isn't that the lady from Judge Judy? But Trump turned these obscure races into holy wars, and the Republicans he targeted weren't liberals. They voted with him almost all the time. Their real crime? They only supported him 99.9% of the time. That's modern MAGA politics. It's not enough to agree with Trump. You have to emotionally submit to Trump. Republicans in Congress understand this perfectly. That's why they don't seriously challenge him when they privately think he's wrong, which is because the greatest threat to a Republican career is no longer Democrats. It's Donald Trump rage posting your name online at 2:00 AM. Now, there's also something darkly funny about the fact that Trump has essentially become the world's angriest Yelp reviewer for Republican politicians. Terrible senator, weak energy, would not recommend. And suddenly $10 million gets spent destroying your career. That's not politics anymore. That's a mob boss with a social media app. And look, Democrats should be careful here too, because the temptation in modern politics is always toward personality cults. Both parties increasingly reward emotional performance over competence, although the problem is much bigger in one party than the other. Let's not kid ourselves. The difference is Trump has perfected it. He understands something most politicians never understand. Politics is not primarily intellectual, it's theatrical. Trump doesn't sell policy, he sells emotional identity. That's why scandals don't work the way normal political analysts think they should. Every scandal becomes proof of prosecution and persecution. Every indictment becomes proof the establishment fears him. Every criticism strengthens the emotional bond he has with his supporters. It's professional wrestling psychology applied to democracy. Trump basically turned American politics into WWE for people who think tariffs are a personality trait. And again, whether you admire him or despise him, that's a remarkable political skill. But eventually all performance art has diminishing returns. Eventually audiences get tired. Eventually people stop buying tickets. Eventually even fans start realizing, hey, this guy's been cutting the same promo for 10 years. And I think Republicans are slowly approaching that moment. Not because Trump vanished, not because MAGA disappeared, but because eventually movements built entirely around grievance hit an emotional wall. Rage is exhausting. Permanent outrage is even more exhausting. Living every day like the Republic will collapse because a Starbucks cup said "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas" is exhausting. At some point, people want stability again, normalcy again, a future again. And that's the opening Democrats could exploit if Democrats themselves weren't so often addicted to their own self-forms of self-righteous performance art. Because right now, American politics feels less like democracy and more like two rival cults, although one is a lot more cultish than the other. And they're arguing over whose merchandise is morally superior. One side wears red hats, the other side puts pronouns in email signatures, and both think they're saving civilization. Meanwhile, a lot of normal Americans are sitting there like, cool, anyway, my rent just doubled. That's the tragedy underneath all this. Politics has become entertainment, identity, religion, therapy, everything except solving problems. And Trump understood before anyone else how to dominate in that environment. That's why yesterday mattered, not because Indiana state Senate races changed the course of civilization, although this one could have an impact, but because they showed Trump still has enough political magic left to make Republican politicians fear him more than voters, principles, or institutions. And that's a heck of a thing for one man to still command nearly a decade after he first came down the escalator. And forgive me if I made it sound too much like I believe in both-side-isms. This is not a both sides issue. The Republican Party today is currently a cult. They've convinced many people the Democratic Party is a cult. I don't think the Democratic Party's perfect. There's many, many, many flaws, but it's not a cult. I'm TJ Walker. This is Filtered. There's more to come. Stay tuned. Here's something I've learned after years of doing this, that people who actually improve don't necessarily hear better advice. They just stay around it longer. They keep exposing themselves to the same useful ideas until it finally clicks. Most people don't do that. So if you want to be in the small group that actually follows through, go to ultimize.com, that's U-L-T-A-M-I-Z-E dot com, and get the free course. There's one on communication, one on building better habits, nothing fancy, just something you can keep coming back to If you're already there, you're doing the hard part. Just go to ultimize.com and build on it. My name is TJ Walker. I have— oh, whoa, whoa, whoa. Sorry, I pulled up the wrong graphic. And okay, we, uh, yeah, we do have the right graphic. Sorry about that. Hey, we are live as we are every day right here, which means if you're watching on TikTok, Facebook, LinkedIn, anyplace else. Hey, you'll occasionally see blunders. That's okay. I'm very much happy you're here with me. And if you have any comments, thoughts, suggestions, disagreements, fact-checking me, feel free to post your comments on whatever platform you are on. So I very much thank you for stopping by. And Dedicated TB, trya, just stopped by to say hello. Thanks for stopping by. Okay, let's dive right into issue 2 for today. My name is TJ Walker. I have long, luxurious, Fabio-style hair flowing majestically down my shoulders like I'm posing on the COVID of a romance novel called Passion at the Cheesecake Factory. I'm 23 years old. I'm a 6-foot-9 African-American NBA All-Star, and many people don't know this, in 2008 I was elected President of the United States. Now, if you're hearing these statements and thinking, wow, TJ Walker's completely lost his mind, correct. You would be absolutely justified in assuming I'm either insane, delusional, or just a deeply pathetic liar, because every single thing I just said is demonstrably false. And if you're listening on the podcast, you can take a look at me and you'll see I don't look like Fabio. Check out the YouTube channel when you have a chance. And yet somehow tens of millions of Americans are now expected to accept the equivalent level of obvious nonsense from the White House every single day. Donald Trump keeps telling us, quote, this is a quote now, the war is over. Really? Meanwhile, our own eyes are watching missiles fly across the Middle East like it's the season finale of Call of Duty: Budget Apocalypse Edition. The administration says, operation complete. Then 5 minutes later, we reserve the right to resume bombing immediately. Well, that's not over. That's like a guy saying, my divorce is finalized. I'm completely over my ex. By the way, tomorrow I'm setting my ex-wife's boat on fire. What? No judge in America would accept that explanation. But somehow the White House expects the American people to nod along like, "Mm, yes, very sophisticated geopolitical nuance." No, this is stupid lying. That's the thing driving me crazy now. It's not mere dishonesty. Look, politicians have always exaggerated here and there and spun stories, but previous presidents at least attempted explanations that vaguely resembled coherence. Trump increasingly just says things that are directly in contradiction of visible reality, and the contradiction is immediate. We ended the war. Uh, okay, then why are American warships still intercepting missiles? Why are military operations still happening in the Strait of Hormuz? Why are negotiations actively happening over sanctions, uranium enrichment, naval access, and future military threats. Why are Pentagon officials openly discussing the threshold for restarting combat operations? Because everybody knows the truth. This thing is not resolved. It's paused, maybe temporarily, 5 minutes, pending the next Trump mood swing and/or regional missile launch. And now, according to reports, The administration is trying to end a massive Middle East conflict with a one-page memorandum of understanding. That's right, a one-page memo. That's where we are now geopolitically. Potential end to a regional war is apparently being handled with the same amount of paperwork required to return sweatpants to Costco. Can you imagine Churchill during World War II? Good news, everyone. We solved the Nazi issue with a laminated Applebee's coupon. And what makes this even more ridiculous is Trump spent years branding himself as the anti-war president. Remember that? This was the guy mocking endless wars, attacking Bush-era intervention, promising America first. Now suddenly we're bombing Iran, blockading shipping lanes, threatening civilization-ending destruction, and being told, oh no, no, no, no, technically, uh, this is just a detour. A detour? That sounds like you accidentally missed the exit on the New Jersey Turnpike, not global oil markets are collapsing and missiles are flying over the Strait of Hormuz. Trump keeps telling Americans the war is over. Meanwhile, missiles are literally flying across the Middle East on live television. That's not a complicated policy disagreement. That's just Blatant lying. The administration says operation complete, then immediately says we reserve the right to restart bombing. Okay, then it's not over. It's ridiculous. It's like a guy saying, again, my divorce is finalized and tomorrow I'm burning down my ex-wife's garage. Nobody would accept that. But somehow the American White House— what's going on right now in Washington The Trump administration expects Americans to pretend this all makes perfect sense while warships are intercepting missiles in real time. The administration keeps changing the language every 12 seconds. It's a ceasefire, it's a mini-war, it's defensive, it's humanitarian, it's over. It's not over. We're bombing. We pause bombing. We might resume bombing. At this point, White House foreign policy sounds less like strategic doctrine and more like a guy trying to explain suspicious text messages from his ex-girlfriend. No, no, baby, technically we're not back together. Meanwhile, the Middle East is exploding behind him, and somehow Americans are supposed to pretend this all makes perfect sense. That's not sophisticated diplomacy. That's a guy frantically rewriting the definition of reality in real time because the actual facts are just too embarrassing. And honestly, I think millions of Americans, including many conservatives, are reaching the point where they know this is ridiculous. Because deep down, people know when they're being treated like idiots, like imbeciles. They know when propaganda becomes so clumsy and obvious that participating in it starts to feel humiliating. That's where we are now. This is the emperor has no clothes stage. Trump is standing naked in the town square, and I realize that's an ugly, ugly thing to visualize, but that's where he is, and he's screaming. Many people are saying this is the greatest suit in presidential history. Half the political establishment is terrified to say, uh, sir, your nipples are out. The craziest part about Trump saying the Iran War is that his own administration keeps accidentally admitting it's not over. They say, well, they're negotiating emergency nuclear agreements, they're discussing sanctions relief, they're threatening renewed bombing campaigns. American warships are still intercepting missiles in the Strait of Hormuz. Pentagon officials are openly talking about the threshold for restarting combat operations. Guess what? It's not peace. That's like declaring your kitchen fire is over while firefighters are still smashing windows and spraying the house with hoses. And the White House keeps changing the terminology every day. It's not a war, it's a mini war, it's a detour, whatever that is. It's defensive. Folks, enough already. This is craziness, it's nonsense. And if you're not sick and tired of being lied to, Well, you're in, uh, you're in for good luck because you're going to get a lot more lies. I'm TJ Walker. This is Filtered. More in a moment. Would you like to be the sort of successful person who is dominating news, at least in your industry? Well, if so, it's time to up your skills. At ultimize.com, I've created online courses to help you do that. Now here's the thing, no obligation. You can get a free course on communication skills, a free course on how to build better habits. All you have to do is go to ultimize.com. That's ultimize.com. No obligation. Go there now. Hi, I'm TJ Walker. We have a slight technical glitch. I'll be back in a moment, ready to go with Issue 3. You don't need a complete life overhaul. You don't need a 10-step system or a 90-day transformation. Most of the time, You need a small shift repeated often enough that it sticks. That's it. If you're listening to this and thinking, yeah, I'd like to tighten up a few things, go to ultimize.com, U-L-T-A-M-I-Z-E dot com. There's a free course there for you, communication skills or habit building, and it's designed to give you something simple, something you can use and repeat every day, not overwhelm you, no complexity, just something you can use. Go to ultimize.com and start. According to reporting from The Times, one of the most famous accidental live television moments in broadcasting history is now celebrating its 20th anniversary. Guy Goma, who had arrived in BBC headquarters in London in May of 2006 for a job interview for an IT position, was mistakenly brought into a live television studio. After a producer confused him with technology journalist Guy Cuney. The producer, Elliot Gotkin, was trying to quickly locate Guy Cuney for a live segment about a legal dispute involving Apple and Apple Corps, the Beatles record label. Instead, he accidentally grabbed Guy from the lobby and rushed him into the studio just minutes before airtime. He apparently said, "Are you Guy?" And the wrong guy said, "Yes, I'm Guy." Guy later said he realized something was wrong when he saw makeup artists, television monitors with his face on them, and recognized BBC anchor Karen Bowerman sitting across from him. But before he could fully realize the mistake, the interview had already begun live. And what followed became one of the internet's earliest viral television clips. I remember it well. I must have watched it 200 times the first week it came out. Despite clearly being shocked and confused, Guy Goma calmly attempted— and I'm gonna show it to you in just a minute— he calmly attempted to answer questions about the Apple legal case for roughly 80 seconds before the interview ended. And honestly, what makes the clip endure all these years later is not humiliation, it's his composure. The guy handled one of the most awkward moments imaginable with remarkable Calm Under Pressure. So if you've never seen it, here it is. I want to show it to you right now. It's just such a classic. And forgive me, for any of you watching on or listening on the podcast, I do recommend— and my TikTok friends who can't see this— I do recommend that you find this clip because it really is just amazingly funny, but also interesting. And again, I'm not making fun of Guy Goma. I'm just marveling at so many different levels of that. So we're going to go ahead and watch this. I want you to watch his face. And this is from the New York Times.

So what does it What does this all mean for the industry and the growth of music online? Well, Guy Cuney is the editor of the technology website News Wireless. Hello.

I just love that. So now he hears the anchor introducing him as Guy Cuney, the editor of a technology publication. This is Guy Goma. He came in to do a job interview. And I guess it's, I can relate to this. You know, you're trying to get a job, you're going into some place, everything's strange, you're a little nervous, you're kind of in your own head. Someone says, are you Guy? Yeah. Sit here, do this. And now he realizes, hey, wait a minute, why are there monitors everywhere? Why is there a famous news anchor talking to me? And then he hears it. He hears himself being introduced as somebody else. I just have to play back the facial expressions because I feel for him on the one hand. On the other hand, it is just an amazingly funny and human moment. Let's look at his face as he's being introduced.

This is Music Online. Well, Guy Cuney is the editor of the technology website Newsweek. Wireless. Hello.

That look of terror. And yet he keeps it all together for, for just a moment. He's like, oh my God, what's happening to me? Let's watch a little more how he does.

Good morning to you.

Good morning.

Were you surprised by this, uh, verdict today?

I'm very surprised to see—

so he's, he's being asked about something he knows nothing about, but But he's just flowing with the conversation. Yeah, yeah, I'm very surprised. Someone asks you if you're surprised about something and you're surprised you're even there, to then say, yeah, I'm surprised. Okay, that makes sense. Let's watch more.

This verdict to come on me, because I was not expecting that. When I came, they told me something else.

And now I want to critique him like I would one of my traditional media training clients. He actually now has regained composure. He sounds pretty comfortable. He's moving his head, is moving his face, is moving his body. He's not frozen. Many people when they're scared just completely freeze. He didn't freeze. I give him credit for that. Now, again, I can't hold him to the same standards of a corporate CEO who has the advantage of days or weeks of media training. His eyes are floating back and forth between the host and the camera, and that can make anyone look more nervous. But again, I'm not taking points against him. I just want to point out what he's actually doing well. Let's watch more.

I mean, you got an interview, so it's a big surprise anyway.

A big surprise.

Exactly. Yeah, yeah, big surprise. Exactly. He's basically just BSing, but for many people, including the anchor, No, but he knows he's not the real expert.

Um, with regards to—

he's keeping a nice smile on his face, which is what I recommend people do anytime they're on TV. His eyes are darting back and forth, which does suggest nervousness, but otherwise he's leaning forward nicely. He has this pleasant smile on his face. His voice is full and rich and resonant.

The cost that's involved, um, do you think now more people will be downloading Actually, if you can go everywhere, you're gonna see a lot of people downloading.

So the other thing I have to give him credit for is a lot of people in this situation wouldn't be able to think at all. They would be so overwhelmed with nerves that they couldn't follow what the host is saying. We've seen this before with pageant winners, you know, there's Famously, there was a Miss Teen USA who just blurted complete nonsense when being interviewed because she was so nervous. Well, this guy, I mean, if you're a beauty pageant contestant, you know you're going to be on TV and it's live. He had no idea. So the fact that he's able to listen to her, hear the keywords like, oh, are you surprised by how many people are downloading? He's following up on that. No, I'm not surprised. People can download everywhere, cafes, all sorts of things. He's actually giving fairly reasonable, intelligent comments, even though by his own admission he knew nothing about what the topic was.

To the internet and the website, everything they want. But I think it's much better for the development and to improve people what they want and to get on the easy way and so fast everything they're looking for.

So again, he's giving coherent answers. Zero prep. He didn't hire me to do a media training with him. He's just— he sounds fantastic.

This does really seem to be the way the music industry is progressing now, that people want to go onto the website and download.

Now the funny thing here is this is— Guy goes on to predict how people might listen to music online. Now 20 years ago, that wasn't a big deal. It was harder to do because this was right before the iPhone came out. Let's not forget. So Now he looks like a prophet, which is again kind of funny.

Music.

Exactly. You can go—

He's saying exactly. He's speaking in precise ways, using bold language, absolutes. These are great sound bites that people pay me and other media trainers a lot of money to teach them how to say. It's coming out of him instinctively.

Everywhere on the cyber cafe, and you can check You can go easy, it's gonna be very easy way for everyone to get something to the internet.

Okay, Kuni, thanks very much indeed. I think we can—

So at some point, somebody whispered in the ear of the producer, or the producer whispered into the ear of the host, hey, we got a problem, this is the wrong guy. So she did, in the interview, she did end it quickly. It was only an 80-second interview. But to me, that— it's, it's interesting at so many levels because for many people, this is their worst nightmare. I mean, it's, it's really kind of the equivalent of having a nightmare and you're having to walk through Times Square naked, or you're walking somewhere naked, you're at the supermarket naked. Many people have experienced a nightmare like that. And, but this guy actually lived through it. He got a lot of attention. Apparently he had He had so much hounding from the media wanting his attention and to interview him, he had to move a time or two. By the way, he didn't get the job at the BBC, but he did end up getting a job. And apparently, he wrote a book with the producer who booked him accidentally and appears to have a nice life since then. So the real lesson— part of the lesson people took away from that is how fatuous all TV commentary is. It's so short, it's so glib, it's so meaningful. Anyone, you could toss anyone in there and it's all interchangeable. I can understand why many people believe that because it is so short and quite often experts are on for 90 seconds. I've done many, many short interview clips where it was half of my day to have to take a limo to MSNBC or CNN or Fox. And you do get sometimes only 80 seconds to actually say what you want to say. So it can be superficial and glib, which is one reason now why so many people want to do podcasts, especially long-form podcasts. It's not just the Elon Musk of the world saying, "I don't want to have my comments cut down to 10 seconds. I want to be able to speak for 4 hours. I'll do it." So there has been some corrective to that. But it's also just fascinating to me to see someone who, no preparation, literally no preparation, had no idea what was coming, and then to do a pretty good job and fool people for a while, although he wasn't intentionally trying to fool anyone. So, Guy Goma, you've given me and, and a lot of my friends, at least in the media training world, hours and hours of pleasure and joy over the world. I want to thank you for being a good sport about all this. I'm TJ Walker. Thanks for joining me today. If you got any value out of the show today, please leave a positive review, leave a thumbs up wherever you are listening to this or watching it. And if you want to learn more about what I do, all you have to do is go to ultimize.com and you can get a free online communication skills course or a free online positive habits building course. There's no charge. You don't have to give a credit card number. Just go there and I'm happy to send it to you for free. Thanks so much. See you tomorrow.