Lyndon Rive: Incentives for Solar Explained

Lyndon Rive discusses how state and federal incentives shaped the solar industry in the US and what happens when the federal tax credit expires. He covers the history of these programs and their impact on solar adoption.
Chapters
At the start, solar did get incentives and most of the states offered rebates. So the two primary incentives, it's a state incentive and a federal incentive. The state incentives helped initiated the market and it was really, really important. In California, there was a million homes solar initiative that worked really, really well. It's not quite a million homes, but it got the start of it. And it was a billion dollar program. The plan was that program to last for 10 years. It only lasts like six and a half, seven years. But the industry did its job. So the industry reduced its cost as the state incentives reduced. And now for the last three years, there's been no state incentives in California. Most of the states for the last three years haven't had any state incentives. So the only remaining state incentive right now is the federal tax credit. And the federal tax credit has a 30% tax credit for solar systems. And that's going to be expiring in 2016 for residential owners. And for commercial, it's going to go from 30% down to 10%. I hope that doesn't happen. It'll be bad policy if it does happen, but we are preparing for that. It actually happens.
Oh, you said it will be happening.
It's going to happen. It's going to expire.
Oh, it'll expire, but is there a possibility? The choice is do they renew or do they pull it away?
So it's going to expire unless D.C. makes a change. There's a fair amount of gridlock right now in dc, But I think it will get renewed a year of a higher probability than not that it doesn't get renewed. If we look at the problem we need to solve. Climate change is a real big problem. I don't know how many storms it will take for us to realize this. I don't know how many fires will take before we realize this. Like, how catastrophic does it have to be before we go, oh, shit, we have no choice but to react. I think the signal will be loud enough right now, but it looks like we have to turn the signal up even further. So hopefully we don't have to. But bad policy would be not to continue with that as we have the solution to the world's biggest problem. And if we stop it, I think 20 years from now you go, okay, we had the solution and we decided not to fix it because of a tax delta between 30% and 10%. That'd be crazy. Now the true best solution to do is not to extend the federal tax credit for solar. Don't have it. But penalize those who are killing us, who are polluting the atmosphere. Pay for the pollution. Very basic. If the pollution was a liquid, you'd have to pay for it. Because it's an air, you don't have to pay for it. So pay for the pollution. Then that would be essentially a tax on carbon. But based on the political influence, I think that's a low probability of that happening. So if that can't happen, then continue incentivizing those who are providing energy. That is not bad for us.
More from GHION.AI

O processo de reconhecer limites, mesmo quando a vida parece exigir sempre mais.

Depois de tantas histórias, aprendizados e pausas necessárias, o @interior_iza está de volta








