Sal Khan: Create Exemplar Customers

Sal Khan on bringing personalized learning to public schools. Los Altos district showed early promise, but scaling hit resistance from teachers who saw their role as content delivery. Khan's team now finds exemplar teachers using data, documents what works, and shares it to create an aspirational ripple effect across districts.
Chapters
Yeah, so the question is, you know, the idea of, you know, say self-paced learning or personalized learning and, you know, using the classroom for more interactive things. You know, these are, you know, it makes sense and these are maybe good ideas, but how do we actually get them into the system, into the public school system, especially, you know, you read about, you know, all of the barriers and all of the resistance to change and whatnot. You know, I don't know the answer for sure. I think there's some reasons for optimism and then maybe some smaller reasons for a little bit of pessimism, but I think there's ways to get around it. The optimism, Los Altos, which was the very first district to reach out, frankly, before we even thought about seriously that a district would even want to do this, they're a public school district. Obviously, they're in kind of a special place in Silicon Valley, and they're driven to a large degree by the parents who really want to see innovation happen for their students. But they have a very forward-thinking school board and superintendent and teachers. And at least showed us that a lot of these— but a lot of the people that they— people often point the finger at, oh, unions. If you have unions, you're not going to be able to do anything, whatever. They have all of those things, but they were able to move fast and they were able to experiment. So to me, the big lesson was where there was a genuine will and a genuine desire, at least in a school district like Los Altos, which is smaller and doesn't have all of the issues as some of the larger school districts have, they were able to move. Now with that said, there was definitely a difference between when we started with 4 classrooms and 5 classrooms and you had your 4 or 5 teachers who were just early adopters. They got it before we even showed up, kind of like Peter McIntosh at Oakland Unity. And it was a great experience. But then when we went district-wide, we started to see a little bit more of the reality. And once again, this isn't about good teacher, bad teacher. It's just about if you're a teacher, what do you imagine the role of a teacher to be? And I think a lot of educators view their job as to cover the material, to, at least if I've covered it, maybe I've done my job, I can go home and I can sleep properly. It takes a huge leap of faith if you're a 9th grade algebra teacher and little Jimmy is really, you know that he doesn't even know how to divide decimals, but you kind of, it takes a huge leap of faith to let him work on that, knowing that if he builds that strong foundation, later on algebra's going to be that much more intuitive for him. Instead, your impulse, well, let me just at least cover the algebra and let him learn to pattern match it a little bit so he can kind of pretend to to answer the question, so I've done my job. So our takeaway is a lot of— the classroom— optimistic— the classroom penetration has been far faster than we would have expected. At the same time, the full implementation is not as much as we would have expected. And so what we're trying to do now, instead of trying to go into District A or District B or School A or School B and say, hey, let's see if we can change together, we're now going the other way where we're looking at the universe of people using us Our first pass is just looking at the data, like who's using us in a substantive way. Then when we see that, we keep filtering it down to like, oh, these people are interesting, let's visit them, let's see how they're using it. And we start to identify this handful of people who are getting it. Frankly, they're getting it better than I would have gotten it. They are really pushing the envelope. Let's understand how they did it. And some of these people are in public school systems, some of them are in charter schools, some of them are in private schools. What did the teacher have to do to kind of let the system let them do it, but then what are their practices? And so we're in the midst of that. That part of it where we're trying to understand what they're doing, document it, and then share it with other teachers. And then also helping them to push their boundaries further where they've been able to do that much, but maybe if we help them and we recognize them, their school or their district will let them go even further. So it's an open question. My general sense, and very few people view education this way, but education is actually, it's fundamentally aspirational. It's all about Everyone is always looking like, okay, who is— what's the institution that's better? What's the neighborhood that's incrementally better than mine? What are they doing? And I want to emulate them. And you see that throughout, you know, AP test. AP test is actually an example of a systemic change that happened without, you know, government intervention. It happened because in the '60s, I think, or maybe '70s, Phillips Andover decided that, hey, you know, our students in calculus or chemistry or physics, this is a university-level course, We should get— our students should get credit for this. And so they started working with an association of colleges and they started to get credit for it. And then you could imagine some others said, wait, our students are just as good, we're just as good of a school, we also are going to do this. And then over the next 30, 40 years, we're now at the point where no— there's very few high schools in the country that kind of even aspire to be half decent don't offer AP courses. In our mind is if we can either highlight or help catalyze even a handful of exemplar, look at what they're doing. And it isn't just good to watch, but look at their data, look at the outcomes, both objective and subjective, look at their students, they're healthier and they're able to do things that you wouldn't have expected the students to be able to do. I think you're going to have kind of an aspirational effect. Now once again, it's not going to happen overnight, but I think it will happen over time. I think we got lucky where we fell into Los Altos. Most school reform people go where it's most broken, where there's 20 variables that are really hard to fix. And even when they do fix it, they do these Herculean efforts, then the next district says, well, if this is such a good system, how come they're not doing it in Palo Alto? How come they're not doing it in Atherton? And what was interesting about this Los Altos experiment is as soon as we did Los Altos, all of a sudden Palo Alto wanted to talk to us. All of a sudden Atherton wanted to talk to us. All of a sudden the private schools wanted to talk to us. And the schools that were facing much more difficult hurdles in the inner city wanted to talk to us. So it kind of helped us understand this dynamic of, yeah, if we can create some exemplars, I think we can start to have cracks form and people start moving in the right direction.
More from GHION.AI

O processo de reconhecer limites, mesmo quando a vida parece exigir sempre mais.

Depois de tantas histórias, aprendizados e pausas necessárias, o @interior_iza está de volta








