IS ASSUMING CONTROL OVER THE CRYPTO FINANCIAL REVOLUTION

BlackRock is really attempting to take over the entirety of the Ethereum network. Not only do they have all this tokenization and things like that, but they're launching a staked ETH ETF now, literally yesterday. BlackRock is trying to be the institutional on-ramp and control the mechanism to get people from traditional finance into cryptocurrency every way they can. They have the spot Ethereum ETF, there's the staked Ethereum ETF, they have all these tokenized treasury products, and they have institutional Ethereum staking infrastructure right now as we speak. So what they want to do is control all of these users All of these people and all this economic value so they can throw their weight around on Ethereum and cryptocurrency to do whatever they want. Vitalik Buterin literally warned of this the other day himself. He said basically they can't get too big. Vitalik Buterin basically said their existence easily leads to the wrong kinds of choices happening on the base layer, and he gives an example of increasing the block times, and it basically is good for high-frequency trading but it's going to be bad for ordinary users. I think this is a really soft way of saying that yes, they can control if they have such significant amounts of economic value. They can control the users and they can sway decisions on the Ethereum layer itself. On the surface, he's just kind of putting it out like, oh man, it's gonna ruin the user experience for Ethereum. But it's a lot deeper than that. As you guys know, we've been talking about specifically JP Morgan and how they recently partnered with Base. Base is a layer 2, the biggest layer 2 that stacks on top of Ethereum with the most credibility because they were created by Coinbase themselves. You know who was also kind of incubated by Coinbase? Early on in the early days before it was significant, USDC. So USDC is pretty much Coinbase at this point. Pretty much Federal Reserve, Coinbase. The banking elite are really taking over. Let me show you what I'm saying. Circle, which is the creator of USDC, are literally exploring reversible USDC transactions. This defeats the whole purpose of blockchain technology. So essentially, let's say you have USDC and you send it from one person to another. They'll have potentially the ability to reverse that transaction and bring it back if they don't like you or whatever the case is, which is insane. So although they don't control the Ethereum governance itself, they can do things like get massive economic value and a huge user base and essentially be the gatekeepers of traditional finance into crypto and then use that weight to throw around. They can influence crypto for sure. They can influence Ethereum and to a certain extent take control of the network without directly saying they're taking control of the network. So when I see stuff like this groundwork for staked Ethereum ETF and all these different things, honestly, I don't even care. I knew this was going to happen. For people to think that this decentralized thing is going to save your life and it's going to save the world and stuff like that, it's hard to believe that considering the fact that the centralized banking elite has more economic value to buy the entirety of the network. So really, the only thing you could do is what I've been doing, is making money off of this. It's not time for a bear market. It has to be the beginning of a bull market if they're launching a staked Ethereum ETF and many other pieces of— yeah, I have many other, uh, pieces of evidence to prove it. But yeah, the future will be on-chain. It will likely be on Base because Base is connected to Ethereum, and it's clear that the banking elite are moving towards these mechanisms. So we have BlackRock, we have JP Morgan, and they're taking control as we speak.