Brian ScottCEO & Life Coach, ASI · Quantum Success Transformation Guide

AI Solved 400 Math Problems—But Who Checked the Proofs

19 Oct 2026 · 2 min

Watch on YouTube

1:31

In this segment of the YouTube video, Brian Scott reflects on recent AI breakthroughs that claim to have solved 300‑400 longstanding mathematical problems within a few weeks. He frames this surge as a potential pivot toward the technological singularity, suggesting that AI may soon be capable of “mathematizing reality.” The conversation quickly shifts to a critical concern: no formal peer review or verification process has been applied to these AI‑generated solutions, leaving the correctness of the proofs unconfirmed. The speaker underscores the abrupt, unnoticed shift in the research landscape and highlights the urgent need for rigorous validation of AI‑produced mathematics.

To me, that felt like that's the beginning of the singularity. If we haven't already crossed that threshold, that's a real pivot point because we are starting to solve very complex mathematical formulas. So are we, are, are we gonna be able to mathematize reality itself?
Well, you were right about that for sure.
Yeah.
Because right now, in the last 3 weeks, there have been probably 300 to 400 And I don't even know what it is as of this morning. Um, math problems that have been longstanding math problems that have now apparently been solved. Now, reportedly, and this is, this is really interesting because something shifted without anyone noticing. And the thing that shifted without anyone noticing is where is the review on the AI to see if all these math solutions are correct? Right. No one's done it.
Not, not yet.
So AI just bypassed academia, which is wild because there used to be, you know, and, and there's, as with anything, that's positive and that's also negative. The positive of it is, is that the gatekeepers are now no longer really powerful gatekeepers. So if you have a solution to something, you could actually put it forward and If AI vets it, then you basically could say I have a proof of something. But by the same token, are all the AI vettings correct?