Charles Cormier accuses Jensen of poor timing with his Dwarkesh interview, which coincided with a Claude/Mitos report finding hundreds of security gaps in banks. Cormier warns that deploying Jensen's chips could let Chinese hackers compromise the financial system, calling it a dangerous profit-over-security move.
It's naive on his end. It's capitalistically motivated. Again, coming back to the investor, Jensen waited 20, 30 years in the dark to be where he's at today, and he doesn't want to give up on the, on the good times, right? I can say that's at least 60%, if not 70%, if not 80% of his thinking. It came at a very bad time, you know, like his interview with Dwarkesh. It came at about the time with Claude, which Claude Mitos announced that it had found like hundreds of critical security gaps in banks. And it's just a bad PR move as well, right? It's like, okay, sure, your company's going to make some money, the investors as well. But what if your chips, your GPUs contribute to fucking Chinese hackers opening the financial system wide open?
Founder Wisdom: the full audiobook (7 hours of quotes and stories from 600+ founders and CEOs)
