In this segment of the Sexual Energy Series, hosts Dave and Lambs discuss electromagnetic fields (EMFs), focusing on the spectrum of EMFs, the distinction between natural and man‑made sources, and the biological impacts of microwave‑frequency EMFs that are prevalent in modern wireless devices. They explain that EMFs range from low‑frequency radio/TV waves up through microwaves (cell phones, Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth), visible light, UV, X‑rays, and gamma rays, noting that the higher‑frequency portions are ionizing and can directly damage DNA. The conversation zeroes in on non‑ionizing microwave EMFs, arguing that health risks stem not from tissue heating but from oxidative stress and free‑radical formation. Lambs cites over 30,000 studies indicating adverse effects, while criticizing current safety standards (set in the 1990s by the FCC) for being based solely on thermal thresholds. They also highlight the influence of the telecommunications lobby, which spends roughly $100 million annually to shape regulation and public awareness. Throughout, the tone is conversational yet critical, aiming to inform listeners about EMF types, potential harms, and why mainstream discourse may downplay these risks. The segment sets the stage for later discussion of a new fabric technology purported to block EMFs from the body.
Bulletproof radio, a state of high performance. Define the types of EMFs that we're dealing with and then I want you to share that with people and then I want you to share the biological harm. But first let's just talk about what are the flavors of EMFs we should pay attention to.
Yeah, so I mean, probably you can start by defining EMFs for people, for listeners who might not know what it is. So EMF stands for electromagnetic field, which also is called, in the world of regular people might be referred to as radiation. So radiation is energy that comes from a source and travels at the speed of light with wave like properties and an electric and magnetic field. So now that I've said this and geeked out on engineering stuff that doesn't ring a bell for anybody. So let me give you a quick some concrete example of what EMFs can be. So EMFs vary based on the frequency that they have, which is the number of waves that will pass through a fixed point per second. And if you go to the lower frequencies, you'll find radio and TV waves. And then you progress into the microwaves, which are what your microwave works on, but also your cell phone, your WI fi, your Bluetooth. Then you get into visible light. That's right. So the sunlight right now is technically emf. Then uv, finally X rays, and then gamma rays and radioactive elements. So everything that is above visible light has very, very high energy. It's called ionizing radiation. And because the energy is so strong, it can knock out electrons from your DNA and from the water near your DNA in your nucleus, which when you knock out an electron, creates something called the free radical, which we can get into later and which damages your DNA. So that's why Chernobyl or like all the other radioactive elements are dangerous for your health, because they actively damage your DNA. The DMF that we're talking about here with Dave are specifically microwaves. And the reason why we are concerned about microwaves today is because you have two types of EMF. You have what's called the natural EMFs. And then so like the sunlight for instance, the earth is naturally emitting very, very low frequency EMFs as well. And then you have the man made EMFs, which are pulsed radiation, and that is not found in nature. And so what studies have shown is that the body reacts to man made EMFs, whereas it's adapted to the natural EMFs that are present. So what does this reaction mean? And this is where it gets interesting. And this is where lamps got started. The reason why LEMPs got started is because today there is over 30,000 studies showing that EMF and especially microwaves can have an adverse effect on your health.
30,000 studies?
Yeah, 30,000. So it we can get into the whole, why haven't people hear, why don't people hear about this? But the science is there, and the science has been there for a long time now.
I agree that the science is there. I'm also from Silicon Valley, where, heck, we invent half these EMFs, right? So most of my engineering friends are saying, dave, these aren't heating the tissues enough to cause any harm. And you know, you can use a microwave to cook yourself, which clearly is deadly. But the core assumption behind what they're saying is the only way these cause harm is by heating. And there's 30,000 studies. How many of those approximately are just saying, oh, look, heating tissues with microwaves is bad? And how many of them are actually looking at other effects?
I mean, close to none of them are looking at heating. And the reason for this is because that's not what's concerning about ems. And actually today, the safety standards that have been set by the FCCS in the 90s, by the way, which is already something that is interesting, meaning in the 90s, where you had the cell phone, where if you were considered a heavy user, that's when you were using your cell phone two hours per month. And so the safety standards were set based on how much it heats your tissues, not based on oxidative stress, which is the real mechanism, and we can get into it, of how EMFs are impacting your body. And if you want to know why you haven't heard about oxidative stress with EMF and rudder heating, let me just give you one number which I think is going to say it all, is the telecommunication lobby, the wireless lobby, is spending about 100 million a year.
