Two speakers discuss cancer treatment options, weighing conventional medicine against alternative approaches. They emphasize the importance of evidence and data when making treatment decisions, while considering quality of life and treatment effectiveness.
If you got cancer, would you take any western treatments? What I would do is I would figure out what the cancer was, and then based on that, there's whole sets of data that show for this kind of cancer. These approaches actually work from the west.
And these.
Alternative approaches also work. So what I do is a combination of the two. But there's a very good chance I would just do the natural approach. The problem that.
People have is they start believing.
That a natural approach is going to work. They have no evidence whether it will or won't, but they just say, I'm not gonna look. So whether you're going with a western or an alternative.
Approach, get the data, track it every month. If what you're doing is working, you'll see it.
And so I'm non.
Denominational about that.
But I wouldn't want cancer and radiation and all that unless there was no other choice. And I was convinced.
It was gonna meaningfully change things. Most western.
Cancer treatments.
They'Re just worried about, don't die. They, they screw up your life and they give you three additional months and they drain your bank account.
Not doing that. Yeah, I'd rather jump off a cliff if that's my choice, and give the money to something that matters.
