Which vaccine is the best? with Dr. Joe Mercola

Joe Rogan talks with Dr. Robert Malone about COVID-19 vaccines, their risks, and why people hesitate to take them. They discuss potential side effects and alternative health approaches during the pandemic.
Chapters
Bulletproof radio, a state of high performance. All right, someone's holding a gun to your head, and you have to get one of the available vaccines.
Now.
Which is the least evil of them. Which one would you pick?
I wouldn't pick any. That's the answer to my question. I would not take any because.
So you just take the bullet to the head. I mean, literally, you would die before you get a vaccine.
I'm going to probably die anyway.
Okay, I didn't expect you to say that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean, believe me, there's a very large price on my head, a very large price. And I have to pay a lot in security to make sure that they're not successful.
Oh, I, I, I know you, and I believe that you've, you've definitely made waves in some big industries where people do not like you. And, and I mean, you're doing good work.
Billions of dollars, that's a, I mean, that is not a hyperbole. That is literally billions of dollars I could document from what we've done. And when you cause billions of dollars to corporation, you are on the hit list.
Yep, I believe that. All right, so you wouldn't do it. So then shoot down my thinking here. There's one that's based on a viral vector, adenovirus, and there's a bunch more that are liposomes with MRNA in it. I feel like the viral vector is better understood, the JJ one. And if I had to do it, I'd probably want that one. Good, good logic. Of course, we don't know.
We don't know. It's the law of unintended consequences. You know, it may make sense. I'm concerned about these animal viruses, and that's one of the reasons I'm concerned about crispr. I think CRISPR for biohacking and longevity purposes, I mean, has so much potential. They just awarded to Jennifer the, the Nobel Prize just a few weeks ago to Jennifer, do you have a life? It's hard to say her last name and another person that got it. So it has great potential. But the CRISPR process uses the adenoviruses, typically. I mean, there might be other viral vectors, but we have no idea what the long term unintended consequences of that intervention is. So I'd be really, really careful.
That's a fair point.
Yeah.
All right, so of the two, sometimes if you're in a position where you really don't have a choice and, you know, you're listening to the show, what should I do? From my perspective, you know, I think there Is unknown risk of all sorts of things, including getting the virus, including getting the vaccine. And I like to have more data before I make decisions which some people think makes me a bad person. I think it just makes me rational. How much time do we need to have since this first wave of vaccines to know whether the bad consequences are there? Is this a two year problem? Is this a ten year problem?
You're going down the wrong line of thinking. There is absolutely, in my mind, in most every other expert, there's 100% no justification for this vaccine. Zero. No one has ever said or claim that it prevents the disease. All it does is lessen the symptoms. And you could, you can treat this with the nebulous peroxide. Probably 95% of people wouldn't even need it. Vitamin D, all the other things we talked about are far more effective.
Oh yeah.
Virtually free and side effects and don't cost anything. I mean it's crazy. So we don't. It's the wrong strategy. You're falling into the propaganda narrative that they.
Not at all. Here's why. Okay, I'm with you 100%. Properly functioning immune system and biology. You're meant to be able to handle this stuff. We've done this forever, so we're 100% aligned. But I know people like, look, Dave, if I get a vaccine, I get to see my mother before she passes. If I get a vaccine, I can reunite with my young children. And I know it's stupid, I know it doesn't work, but I am going to go years without seeing my family if I don't do something I don't want to do. So since I have to do it in order to achieve other goals that have nothing to do with vitamin D, what the heck am I going to do? Are there things that you would do to lessen the damage from a vaccine? Like would you take a bunch of enzymes that break up liposomes before you take it? Like, like how would you mess with a vaccine if you had to get it?
Well, that's a good question. And interestingly I've interviewed a lot of good people and I think Judy Mikovitz being one of the best.
Yeah, you would know.
Certainly one of the most well qualified to answer that question is from anyone. I would know because I had the same question and actually thought about it and realized it was Judy. She's a, she's not only a virologist, she's a molecular biologist and she's a brilliant out of the box thinker that has never committed to conventional a process. So I asked her that question and it makes a lot of sense. There are things you can do. It's essentially everything you would do to treat the infection. Some of the other things she adds.
In, that's really before the vaccine.
Before the vaccine, yeah. So you have your vitamin D levels perfect. You're doing all the biopsy we talked about metabolically flexible, avoiding linoleic acid, which you're such an early adopter of. Kudos for that. You know, cyclical ketosis, all those things. And then probably do the nebulized peroxide when you get it. So because all of those will improve your body's resiliency to any types of toxic insult. So that's what I would do but I wouldn't get the vaccine. I wouldn't get it because you're, you're capitulating, you're surrendering, you're giving up. That means they won. There is no justification for this, that they've gotten away.










