Naming the wrong emotion during a conflict still helps because the other person corrects you, and that correction activates the brain's emotional regulation. Lieberman's research shows there's no wrong move when you give language to feelings, even if you get it slightly off.
Chapters
Now here's the part that stops most people, which is what do you actually say? And what happens if you get it wrong? Well, here's the thing, and this is the part that surprises every single person I teach. If you name the wrong emotion, the other person will correct you, and that correction itself calms them down. No big deal. Don't worry about making mistakes. Don't worry about naming the wrong emotion. It's actually a good thing. Lieberman tested this specifically. When a wrong emotion was named, the subject said, "No, that's not it." I'm not angry, I'm sad. And when the correct label was given, the brain regulated anyways. The act of correcting engaged the same neural pathway. What that means practically is that there is no wrong move here. You're not trying to be a mind reader. You're giving the flooded brain a concrete linguistic target to push against. You're angry. No, I'm not angry, I'm just exhausted and nobody sees it. You just found the real emotion. The brain just did it for you. Most people are afraid to name emotions directly because they don't want to be wrong and they're afraid of looking foolish or stupid or being rude. That fear is the reason most difficult reasons stay difficult.