Two speakers debate whether a stable job actually means stability, or just decades spent not living. They ask what you're really trading when you choose security over risk, and whether conventional stability serves a meaningful life.
For those that are at this early on, it's even a little bit more I mean is it more risky, one may say because you're, you know, setting up, you're pretty much choosing to set your own thing up versus taking something that may be a little more stable. But then arises the question of what is stability, what is security? Those questions always rise. Is it working? I have another question that goes with that.
Which.
Is what is the cost?
What's the cost of security, right? Because you trade 40 years of your life for doing a job, a job. You trade 40 years of your life. You've had a stable life, but have you lived, right? Have you really lived? And.
So what's the cost, right? And another quote before I get back to what I was saying, it's so many people say, oh, I would die for this, what I got going on right now.