Stephen Shapiro introduces the Goldilocks principle as a guide to framing problems: avoid questions that are too soft (vague, inviting noise) and too hard (overly specific or solution-framed), and aim for questions that are 'just right.' He references the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez oil spills as illustrative examples and indicates further examples will follow.
Chapters
In the last two videos, I talked about the Deep Water Horizon oil rig explosion and the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Today I want to talk about the Goldilocks principle. Remember Goldilocks and Three Bears? She goes into a house, one bed is too soft, one bed is too hard, and one is just right. The same thing is true with the questions that we ask. Some questions tend to be too soft, too abstract, too fluffy. Sort of like, how do we stop the flow of oil in the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion? And that invites a lot of noise. How do I increase sales? How do I increase productivity? How do I increase margins? These invite a lot of wasted energy. On the flip side, we sometimes ask questions that are too hard, too specific, too detailed. They are either solutions masquerading as questions, or they are so specific that they limit us to one domain of expertise. This was the case with the Exxon Valdez oil spill, where originally it was thought the problem had to do with oil. Actually, it was a common fluid dynamics issue. So what we want to do is make sure we're asking questions that are just right. And in the next examples, we will talk about a number of different places where the Goldilocks principle was applied to get better solutions.