Dirty Bulking: Why It's a Waste of Time

10 Sept 2017 · 6 min
6:18

Jeremy Ethier argues dirty bulking (500+ calorie surplus) builds no more muscle than lean bulking (250 calories over maintenance) but adds unnecessary fat. A study of 39 lifters eating 3,600 versus 2,900 calories gained similar muscle in 10 weeks, but the higher surplus meant more fat to cut later.

Questions this video answers

A caloric surplus greater than 500 calories above maintenance.

A moderate surplus of around 5–10% above maintenance, roughly ~250 calories.

39 strength-training athletes; ~3,600 kcal (high surplus) vs ~2,900 kcal (moderate surplus) for 10 weeks.

1,265 men.

From ~10% to ~14–15% within 1–2 months, eventually reaching ~18% by the end.

More from Jeremy

16:21
youtube.com

I Proved (Almost) Everyone Is Wasting Time In The Gym

5d ago
22:25
youtube.com

I Tested 30 Ab Exercises - You Only Need These 2

2w ago
28:23
youtube.com

I Gave Him Fake Steroids For 100 Days

1mo ago
13:18
youtube.com

Why You Store Fat Here, And How To Get Rid Of It

1mo ago
13:11
youtube.com

This Shouldn't Work, But It Blows Up Your Muscles (In 30 Days)

2mo ago
23:05
youtube.com

I Swapped Diets With A 700 lbs Couple

3mo ago
10:49
youtube.com

Why Your Tendons Never Heal (And How To Fix Them)

3mo ago
youtube.com

I Ran Everyday For 30 Days, It Changed My Life

4mo ago
youtube.com

Targeting Belly Fat Is POSSIBLE?! (60-Day MRI Experiment)

4mo ago
youtube.com

What Every Body Type ACTUALLY Looks Like (And The Fix)

5mo ago
youtube.com

If You Can't Do This, You're Not Fit (Even If You Look It)

5mo ago
See all content