When AI Becomes Everywhere, Human Presence Becomes Premium

When your virtual self, right, can be anywhere and everywhere all at once, that's troubling. You can't really begin to trust everything you see. Social media becomes pure AI slop. Then the human, the crafted with care, the human created becomes the premium. And then human presence becomes really important. Like, was I actually there? I actually showed up and gave the conference. I actually was here. Human presence and that idea and that concept becomes the premium.

Katty, I'm so excited to have you at the Top 5% Method. Welcome to the pod.

I'm so excited to be here. Thanks for inviting me.

And for those who don't know Katty, she's going to introduce herself. But I think how we met was purely incredible. I went from being a big girl fan on LinkedIn. I saw your purple dress. Yeah, you had this long purple gown and I was like, and she's talking about the metaverse. I'm like, who is this woman? I need to get to know her. And then we went on a cruise. Cruise, 2024, went on a cruise and we were, you were right next to me in the lineup and I was like, Katie, it was Katie Hackl, oh my gosh. And then we started texting and connecting and then you were giving a speech on that cruise. And then today here you are at the Top 5% Method. It's like full circle. I'm super duper excited to have you, Katie. Can you please introduce yourself for my audience?

Absolutely. And yeah, I do think it's serendipitous how we met. It was crazy. Yeah. So my name is Kathy Hackl. I'm a and gaming executive. I'm a podcast host and author of 5 books. You know, I've worked in tech for almost a decade in everything from AI to hardware, all the new AI hardware. I mean, I was kind of working in hardware for a long time. I've worked with, you know, all sorts of brands advising everyone from Louis Vuitton to Ralph Lauren to Walmart on emerging technology, including gaming. I'm a jewelry designer as well.

No.

Concert producer. Like, I have so many things I've been able to do in my life.

What do you think about my jewelry?

I like it. I like it. I'm just wearing regular pearls here. I'm not like bringing any of my flash, but I like it. I like— I love your nails. I was like, I didn't get mine done, but it's okay.

It's been you.

I do like your ring though.

So, so, okay, we're going to go woo woo. So the nails are the brand color of the pod, which is light pink. I'm sorry for those who are listening in audio. You got to go on YouTube, check it out, or on Spotify. And the blue is a color that I'm— I feel very called to. So I'm reintegrating it on my main social media. So the pink and the blue, I think I'm always going to do my nails like that moving forward, but always it's a phase. And then the ring is black obsidian, which is for protection from evil energies.

Yeah, mine's tanzanite.

So which one is it?

Tanzanite from Tanzania. Yeah. And it changes color a little bit. So I feel it's supposed to like also bring in good energy change. It's about change, which is very, very appropriate for me.

Change, transformation. What is also funny is after we stayed in contact, we realized we were going through the similar life changes and transformation. So I'm not going to talk about it, that's a topic for another day. But I, I'm so, I'm so, so excited to have you here. I think I want to kick it off because like you, I met you, you were the queen of metaverse, and you've been doing spatial computing for a very long time. You've been talking about AI before AI was buzzy. Now everybody and their mama talks about it.

It's so true.

So what is the most surprising way that you've seen AI evolve from pure productivity tool, like trying to save, like automate things and, and save time, to like augmenting human creativity?

I would say I've seen it. I— there's two things, two things I'm going to mention that I think are relevant. One is I have definitely seen it help a lot of people launch their own companies a lot faster, right? Because they don't need such big teams. Basically, if you have— and like OpenAI says this— if you have an idea, you have a company. Like, you, you can actually create so many things now because AI is enabling us to do that. So I think for many entrepreneurs, this supercharges them, allows them to maybe not have to go raise, you know, around— like, they don't have to go talk to VCs. They might just be able to get to their minimal viable product pretty quickly. So I love seeing that even like young kids, like young kids in high school or college that are launching companies and making $1 million, $2 million. Like, I love seeing that. So love seeing that. On the other side, Sora from Sora 2 from, from OpenAI, which is the video generation app that they released, which in essence pretty much allows you to create any video with a prompt. Right. But pretty good videos. Right.

Yeah, they're pretty good.

Pretty good. Pretty good. But the fact that you can deepfake yourself into anything with other people that you're deepfaking yourself into these things.

Yeah.

Very few times do I get access to a new technology or tool where I'm like excited, but also worried.

Yeah. Like, oh, yeah, I can give you an example. Last year, I did a deepfake of myself. It was horrible. Half of my mouth was was moving to see her have a new one. And I don't think people could know that it's not me. And it took me 30 minutes and I'm in love with her.

I could be talking to her, who knows, right?

No, no, no. This one I haven't been working out. So this one is a little bit more plump. But we like to be plump. But the other one, she's like, her eyes are like, it's like, what do you do your daily workouts and you follow a good regimen and you're actually very you're sleeping and the light is perfect. She looks good. Well, no, that— so why does this worry you?

Well, because in some way, shape, or form, when you have a tool this powerful where you can be anywhere and everywhere all at once, okay, because it get— like, what I did is I grabbed the tool and I said, well, what can I do with this? And I started thinking. I said, I'm gonna be front row, so put me front row at Paris Fashion Week, right?

So with Katheline Jean-Pierre.

Well, yes, I should have put that with a cameo with Katheline Jean-Pierre. Um, but for, you know, front row at Paris Fashion Fashion Week. You know, it actually, it actually styled me very differently and gave me an idea for a different like hairstyle, which was really interesting. But regardless, like it did that, then I said, well, what about giving a, you know, a talk, like giving one of the addresses at the United Nations General Assembly. So I placed myself doing a talk at the UN General Assembly.

Were you actually talking, speaking?

Yeah.

So basically, it just looked at the whole database of the internet, found your speech, and then reproduce something?

Well, I told it what to say. I told it to talk about human presence, etc., etc. So the clip is me addressing the General Assembly, saying, Your Excellencies, blah, blah, blah, human presence is going to be the metric of the future. So when you— when, when your virtual self, right, can be anywhere and everywhere all at once, that's troubling. You can't really begin to trust everything you see.

No, I mean, and we've seen it with Cambridge Analytica, how it influenced the political elections. And we've seen that this election as well. I mean, in the US, for those who are listening from the US, you can see that there were a lot of deepfakes. There were a lot of— I mean, there's a lot of content created about very famous people, politicians doing certain things that are not real. And when it's amusing, it's amusing. But what is the scariest that you could foresee in terms of having this, these deepfakes running around the world doing things that are not real?

It's basically what, what it ends up being is that you can't trust anything you see, right? And then social media becomes pure AI slop. Yeah, right. Social media, social media use is already in decline, especially by younger people. But if it ends up being just AI slop, like, would I really— like, would I personally want to engage with that? No, I find that boring. So, so there is a positive and a negative. It is if it goes that negative route and it's AI slop everywhere, then the human, the crafted with care, the human created becomes the premium, right? And then human presence becomes really important. Like, was I actually there?

Yeah.

No, you can— yeah, I actually showed up and gave the conference. I actually was here. Like, that becomes human presence. And that idea and that concept becomes the premium rather than my deepfake showing up and doing it.

So do you think that people who want to break through in social media or whatever is going to be the next phase of social media will have to be unpolished and just be their real themself, as they say.

It's interesting because even, even like MrBeast is concerned, like he posted on LinkedIn, on Twitter, actually on Twitter, he said something like, if the future of the internet is only AI videos, that's going to have a lot of repercussions for creators, including himself. You know, this, that's, that's really interesting. I also think that we are seeing a shift happening because all this AI stuff is being— AI slop is being thrown at us.

Mm-hmm.

In some ways, we are moving a little bit from what I— from the attention economy, which is a coined term, you know, that we've all used to what I call more like the intimacy economy or the affinity economy, where you start to decide where to spend your time or who to spend your time with, whether it's virtually or physically. Depending on the level of intimacy that you're creating with, with that brand or that person, uh, or that technology. And by intimacy, I don't mean just, you know, I think people tend to go to the physical intimacy side. Intimacy is about human interrelationships. There's, there's intellectual intimacy, there's experiential intimacy, there's physical intimacy, there's many, there's spiritual intimacy. There's so many different types of intimacies. And that's how I feel. This is shifting quite a bit is, you know, when people are going to ChatGPT— I'll give you an example— when people are going to ChatGPT to, to create their dating profiles, to reply to people's texts, all these sorts of things, or to analyze those texts, they're starting to create some level of emotional intimacy with ChatGPT, right? Because they're using it to kind of like offload, you know, basically this is the thing. If you're offloading your hard conversations that you're supposed to have with a human, to ChatGPT to write you a text, you're creating emotional intimacy through ChatGPT that is not necessarily real.

It's not your real you, because you all have emotions, we have reactions. Like sometimes people talk about when you're in a relationship with anyone, it's your, it's your inner child, wounded inner child that's speaking to their wounded inner child when there's a conflict.

Yeah.

Versus— so, and chat will give you the politically correct version of what to say. And how to frame your email such that you are politically correct. But those are not real reactions. So do you think that— so you talked about the intimacy. What does it look like for somebody today or somebody in 2030? I'm going to fast forward very far in 5 years, not even 5 years, 4 years, because we're almost done with 2025. Fast. Yeah. 4 years from now, what do you think people are going to be longing for? You talked about intimacy. What does it look like if I want intellectual intimacy with someone? What do I do?

Well, this is the thing. I think there is a bit— there is going to be a bit of a backlash, whiplash, let's call it really whiplash, okay, that I think humans are going to feel if they lay in— lay into some— into AI so much that human— the human-to-human connection becomes the premium, right? If I can have an— and we were— we are going to talk about my experiment with the AI boyfriends, but yes, if you can have a human You can have the perfect AI boyfriend that always tells you the perfect thing. And then you're dating humans that are not going to tell you the perfect thing. Right. But there is a messiness to being human, to being with someone. There is something that these— the AI boyfriends cannot fulfill right now for most people. The realness, the real connection, the realness, the messiness of being human, the physical touch, all these sorts of things. I think if I want to frame people's mind, I want them to close their eyes and think about— let's think. 2035, not even 2030, 2035. And I want you to think about your family portrait. Like, you know, the typical family photo we send at Christmas or whatever.

Yeah.

Who's in that picture? My question is your son.

Yeah, my son's going to be so big and so big, girl.

Oh my God. Gosh, my kids too. They would be like adults by then. But I have like, I have a question. Is there a robot in the picture?

Well, only if the robot does the dishes and helps organize my messiness, like my mess.

That's Rosie from The Jetsons, which was always in every picture of The Jetsons. So yeah, Rosie from The Jetsons. Is there a hologram of a member that has died?

Oh, I would love that. That would be so great. And also my family's in Canada, so like, I don't know, like, you know, parents get old. A virtual version of them.

If your son— I mean, hypothetically, I don't know how old your son would be by then, but let's say he's old enough to have kids and the grandkids are in the picture. Maybe not, not yet, right? But hypothetically, if your grandkids were in the picture, would, would they, their imaginary friend in virtual form be in the picture?

No, but you know where I'm going, and I don't want to scare people. So I've lost how many kids? I've lost I miscarried 3 kids, right? And, and I'm— I've healed from that. But imagine having them in the family picture because they're, you know, they, they were there for a short period of time. But I think that's what— not always, but maybe once, just to see who it could have been. And, and we like— because I want to honor these, these little babies as well.

So those are things to think about. The technology has good— both, both good and bad. And in one of the talks that I do, I present this and I said, there's— it's, it's, it's neither black or white right now. It's very gray. And ultimately you as the end user have to decide what is the best way for you to use this technology.

Yeah.

Right. And I present 3, 3 or 4 different use cases. I present one where I got a text from a friend saying his friend had lost her brother to suicide. And what I thought about them putting all the text exchanges and emails into ChatGPT to see if they could get a reason why that person committed suicide, because that person did not leave a note.

Oh, wow.

And my initial reaction, being honest, was absolutely not. ChatGPT is not going to guarantee or give you a real answer because it cannot know, right?

Mm. But all the— if ChatGPT has, or any other Anthropic, has all the trace of all that the person was looking for, searching, or even Gemini or Google, like you have, it could invent some kind of reason.

It could come up with something. So my initial reaction was absolutely not. But then I was talking to a couple of people who have lost people to suicide and they said to me, no, Kathy, because when you lose someone to suicide, there's a hole. Like there's no closure. If they didn't leave a note specifically, there is no closure. You will not know. So if ChatGPT can give me an 80% chance of the reason why I'll take it. And I was like, that was to me very transformative. It was like, I'm judging it from, from my perspective, but it's neither black or white. It's very gray. And like I said, you, the end user, have to decide what is the best way for you to use this technology.

So it's power to the people. What you're saying is that we should— we are going to be curating our engagement with everything that's artificial intelligence in a way that's healthy for us, ideally, and not unhealthy for us. And something when you talked about social media being unreal, so let's say, you know, there was the rise of the influencers. Do you think if MrBeast says, okay, I'm gonna offer a retreat, or even Kathy Hackles, like, I'm offering a retreat, meet me— and some influencers are starting to do that— yeah, meet me in the Bahamas for 3 days where we're gonna do like meditation, work on your business, etc. Do you think people will be more hungry for that than the purely perfectly curated posts and your posts are not perfectly curated. They're very real.

Yeah, absolutely. I think we're taking a turn towards more human, higher ticket human experiences. I feel like that's also how it's going. Even if you look at the bigger tech conferences, you're starting to see smaller versions of these tech conferences happening, which are more niche, more, more, more like more personal. So definitely, definitely, definitely see kind of a return a return of sorts to that in-person, like, engagement that is real, right? And, and at the end of the day, this is, you know, if we look further into the future and we say, okay, if, if the statistics are right and what people are predicting are right, but many people are predicting, and AI does replace, you know, 300,000 jobs or whatever, whatever the number is.

I mean, way more. Just this year there was 85,000 layoffs.

Yeah.

That was like, early in 2025. I stopped counting.

Yeah.

So millions and millions of jobs.

So if you talk about millions of people without a job, what are they going to turn to if they can't find another job? They're going to probably turn into like themselves and try to find themselves and try to figure out what to do with their lives. So I see this like this, like whiplash once again of like we're pushing the tech so hard and they've had those, those effects. And then also for the companies, for the— this is what baffles me. It's like everyone's running towards more shareholder value, bigger valuations. If you eventually get rid of jobs, then who's going to be able to have money to buy your product? Right? Like if everyone is out of a job, not robots.

Yeah. Not robots.

Right. If everyone's out of a job, then who's going to have money to buy your product? And you're like, it just, Yeah, it baffles me sometimes.

I love the idea of the whiplash. 2025 also, like, in— it was a year of like the lot of like great awakening. We had COVID 2020, and then 2025, people— there was quiet quitting, and then there was, uh, quiet cracking people, and then job hogging. Job hogging is like people are holding on to jobs.

Surviving '25, that's what they're doing, surviving '25.

If, if even if the job doesn't serve you, just holding on. Let's take that because they are so scared of the layoffs, and there's insecurity or that. And then there's also the other phenomenon is the big freeze, is that the new, the new graduates, they're being asked to have 3 years of experience. So I want to ask you, as like really somebody who's been following the trends and, and be part of that conversation for multiple years, what do you think are the skills? Because people talk about AI replacing jobs, but there's AI augmenting, complementing the human. But if you were a worker today, what are the critical skills you would focus on developing such that You can be future-proof even though you can never really be.

You can never really be future-proof. But I think storytelling, like kind of what you're doing with your podcast, becoming a master storyteller, whatever it is the topic is, that's super important because yeah, AI will be able to tell stories, but I want to hear a human story. Yeah, it's very different. If this is a clear example, if I am putting my youngest daughter to bed and I tell her a story, She feels it closer to her heart than if I use a recorded— we have— there's an app called Slumber that tells her stories, and sometimes I'm too tired, so I'll play for that for, for her. If I'm too tired, it's very different than mommy telling her a story. So same concept, right? AI will be able to create all these videos and all these things, but is it gonna feel the same? You know, I would rather see a real actor on stage in theater Right. So storytelling, I think sports, human, like experiential things that you have to go and experience. Yeah, I think sports are safe. I went to a, to the Miami Grand Prix earlier this year for F1. I was thinking about that. Why do I enjoy this? I enjoy this because it's about the driver. There's a level of like danger. It's about the team and it's about the, you know, the drivers having competition. It was a robot driving this or a self-driving car. I could care less if it crashes on the side.

So you don't see a future where there's going to be robots that are going to become known, that are going to be branded and going to be able to race in Formula One? Because there's— in San Francisco, they already have robots fighting in pits. And I'm like, I lived in San Francisco and I'm like, I am not surprised.

Yeah, I'm not surprised. But is it really that exciting? I mean, what happens? They get broken and that's it. But you go to an MMA fight because you want to see technique. And yeah, and if you're there for the blood and gore, like, that's a different thing. But I think— I still think going to see the soccer players, going to see the F1 drivers, there's still hope there. So anything—

those are very elite. You're talking about the top 1.01%.

Ronaldo, Messi. Yes.

What about the John and Jane?

John and Jane storytelling, I think is important. Any, any of those soft skills, any emotional intelligence, soft skills, how you handle people. I mean, if it all comes, if it all comes crashing down and all we have is people.

Yeah.

I mean, learn all the AI tools. This is what I think. It's like, I don't think necessarily everyone needs to go and learn. You need to learn how to use AI. Yes. But learn to use the tools that are valuable to you. Yeah, right. Don't get blindsided because there's a new tool coming out every single day.

I know, I know. Loveable was good, but now there's— I don't even know how to pronounce this— N8N.

Yeah. So, or Bold. Like, there's so many things. And even I was watching OpenAI's Dev Day and it's like all these apps inside ChatGPT. So basically you're not even having to leave ChatGPT anymore to do anything. Because it's going to connect with all the apps. So is it the end of apps? So I don't know. I, for me, it's like, learn to use AI, but learn to use it in a way that benefits you, that is good for you. And then use the tools that make sense for you. Don't go chasing every single new tool, because it doesn't always matter to your job. Right?

Like, I'm like, burnout. So the godfather of AI said that learn a craft, learn a craft, like become a plumber or an electrician or like a nurse because you deliver babies and like learn a real craft. Do you— would you agree with that?

I think so. It becomes very artisanal. I do think we will go back to those jobs like HVAC, even, even with the data centers. Like if you— there was a whole story on CNBC, I think it was CNBC, I can't remember which, which channel it was talking about the explosion of AI data centers. And the lack of HVAC technicians available to service these things. So yes, you're going to need definitely more plumbers, more HVAC technicians, more nurses.

You— we had a triple click on that because I geek out.

It's crazy. It is like we are going to go— those trades.

Yeah.

You know, nursing is not a trade. There's, you know, it's different. But I think all of those things that have to do with, you know, those services, like you still need— you still need— a robot's not truly going to come to my house and fix my HVAC. AC just yet.

No, no. So, yeah, so I'm curious about something. So my friend writes, he works at like for a company that offers services to help figure out where we're going to put all those data centers. And he posts about it every day. And he said there's 588,000 jobs that are going to be lacking in the next, I think, 2 years, because who's going to maintain and manage those data centers? My question to you, Katie Acko, is what are the— if somebody— because I have a girlfriend who wants to pivot towards the data centers, but what are some of the, the jobs and trainings necessary? Because that's another opportunity that people are listening. Hey, I know they're going to cut my job, but then what do I do? Like, where you want to be where it's growing, you don't want to be where it's declining. So what are all the types of jobs you can have in a data center type of, of function?

Yeah, so I actually worked at a data center for like a little less than a year. Gosh, it was a couple years ago. I was working at a— I was a hologram producer. I was a vice president at a hologram company, and the hologram company was inside a data center because the person that created it was really good friends with one of the guys that owns some of the largest private-owned data centers. So I used to go to a data center, you know, to work. So I got to see how it works and how it I will tell you, definitely security is a huge thing. The security of the data centers is huge in many ways, not only the physical security of the person there, but the cybersecurity. There's so many levels there of things that need to be in place for the data center to be safe. Then obviously it runs, it runs hot. So there's lots of water that needs to cool it. The air conditioning is usually beyond freezing.

Okay, so, so it's going to be energy intensive, not energy intensive.

So anything with energy, any type of craft there, we still need a human in the loop. Because there are things like racks that don't start, that stop working. There's, there's many different components. But these are like giant rooms. I don't know how to explain it. Like, if anyone—

I like— I know, I— because, you know, Silicon Valley, the show? I don't know. Yeah, I loved it so much. I was like, so, so hooked.

I feel so real right now, kind of sadly.

But I know it feels so, so real. I— anyway, My, my rant against Silicon Valley the show was that there was only one, uh, Black woman character and she was the prostitute. And I was like, but why? She can't— like, I wasn't—

she should be the CEO.

Yeah, I was a sales executive and why can't you find— anywho, so that I didn't like, but I liked the show a lot. But they talked about data centers and this, this life where there's going to be different cities like worldwide which are going to be data center cities. So I want to recap on the roles. We talked about security and cybersecurity because I'm taking notes from security, cybersecurity, you said energy roles for AC, water.

And then you talked about like, you need a human who's also going to manage it, manage it, then you're going to need someone to be the human relations person of this because this is going to impact the community it's in. I don't care which data center it is. Data centers are loud. And it's, it's, yeah, like, it's, there's gonna be someone that has to manage the relationships with the community, the negotiations, I mean, the costs. There's so many different roles that lawyers, lawyers, lawyers are having a great time, like figuring out the data centers, like, I mean, they're gonna be basking in the data center.

So and then for those cities, what, what, how does it feel like, is it dangerous to live there? If you want to have kids, you want to be pregnant?

And that depends, it depends on the data center. I mean, here where I live, I live in right outside DC. And we have a corridor in Loudoun County, um, which at, at, you know, up until recently the, the saying was 70% of the world's internet traffic goes through that data center area because it's a data center corridor. So it's literally data center, like data center and data center, and then like tons of data centers are there. AWS, Sabre, like everyone has data centers there. Google, everyone, absolutely everyone. That's a a hyperscaler especially has a data center in the, in that corridor of Northern Virginia. They did it where there was a lot of land, uh, they were able to kind of like do it in a way where they incentivize growth, but they are loud. Like, they are— these data centers are loud and they use a lot of resources. So I don't know what the medical implications of living near a data center are. Like, that's not my—

that's not my forte. You're not a doctor.

They are loud. There are issues. They're, they're, you know, definitely they consume a lot of energy. That being said, it is an amazing business opportunity, especially if you look at some of the up-and-coming regions, right? If you're data centers that are going to help, that are going to target India, that are going to like target Africa, like emerging markets.

Do you think that like in terms of like, let's talk about the business people, business people who like feel maybe they're going to become obsolete. Do you think they can reproduce their knowledge of project management or strategy? Is there product to manage as well as a product management function around data centers?

I mean, there will be projects like, yeah, but you might have an AI agent that kind of takes over some of that and maybe assigns that to someone. Eventually you do need a human to come in, like do something. If there's an issue at the data center, you eventually need the human up until you get the real robots, humanoid robots that work well. But anyway, yeah, which is— it's so confusing and sad in some ways.

That's, that's for another day. That's for another day.

That's for another day. I will say this in a line of like positive hope and looking at kind of things in the future, because I think we lose a lot of hope when we start going down this AI rabbit hole of sorts.

I mean, except if you're an entrepreneur, solopreneur and your business is growing, then just keep pushing.

Well, I'm excited about AI. Don't get me wrong. Like I'm using it. I'm launching a course. Like I've talked to you, like I'm trying to like figure out what to launch with AI as well. So I think that there is a lot of benefit, right? If it's a solopreneur, as a creative, there's a lot of great things. That being said, I also think when we look at the younger generation, right, your, your son, my kids, this your newer generation. So like the younger Gen Zs, Gen Alpha and Gen Beta, which is being born. And I think about what are gonna be their jobs? Like what are they gonna do? Like if your, if your son's like, what should I study in school? It's like, It's really hard right now to advise any kid because the advice used to be go, go learn to code. Now it's like, well, we can all build apps now.

So it depends. Immigrant families is you're going to be a lawyer, you're going to be a doctor, you're going to be an engineer. Those are the three. And I kind of slipped through it and I went into psychology and then I changed to political science without my parents knowing. But that's a whole different world. But I think— what do you think? Do you think sales is going to be needed?

Well, sales, I mean, as long as people still have money to buy something, yes, sales will continue to be important. But if it eliminates all the jobs, then no one's going to have money. So it's like, to me, it's like it's, you know, the snake eating its own tail or whatever the saying is. But what I was going to say is like this younger generation doesn't think like we do. They are not tied to only jobs in the physical world. So I'll ask my son, for example, what— at one point I asked him, what do you want to be? What do you want to do? And he was like, I want to be a Roblox developer. He became a Roblox developer. He builds virtual worlds. So—

oh, he's in his 20s already.

No, no, he's young. My son is, um, my son is 13.

So is he making money?

He's had months where he's made like $100, like depends.

So he built his own, developed his own skill.

Yeah, developed his own skill. He learned to do it. So this younger generation doesn't limit their job prospects just to the physical world. They're thinking virtual and they're thinking off planet, which is the weirdest thing.

Wow.

I asked my daughter once, my, who's now She's now 15. I asked her, what do you want to be? And she said, I want to be a lunar food scientist. Lunar food scientist. I'm like, hey, like, she's going to create food in the moon. So this younger generation doesn't limit their job prospects to just the physical world. They're thinking virtual and they're thinking off planet as well. So I think that also is a level of hope for us when we think about what careers— we don't even know what careers are going to be around.

No. So that's all we can say is we don't know and we get to explore and like Jeff Bezos wants to have data centers in, I think, is it Mars or the moon? I mean, we never know.

Well, you can actually start to do a lot of stuff in space to power data centers, but that's like a different story.

It's a whole different story. So I want to talk a little bit more about the AI, uh, agentic AI shift. We're moving from simple like chatbots. A lot of people are using chatbots, not everybody, but I don't know what the adoption is. So when looking at evolving from simple chatbots to autonomous AI agents that can complete, like, complete tasks, like, in a job. Yeah. So how do you see this changing organizational structures in companies in the next, like, 2, 3 years?

Well, it definitely eliminates friction, right? If you have agents that can do multiple tasks and solve multiple issues at the same time, automatically, 24 hours a day, that eliminates friction. Hence, when you eliminate friction in the corporate side, you eliminate jobs. As well, right? Because that's an expense.

Yeah.

So it depends. I do think that's from a corporate standpoint. From a consumer perspective, agents can be incredibly useful, right? If I could code an agent— if maybe I should do this— if I could code an agent for next year, I would definitely code it, create my own agent that would do all the work for me to sign up my kids for summer camp. So as you know, and any parents that are listening to this or have kids in their families, Summer camp, if you want to go to the best summer camps, it's usually like you're sitting in front of the computer waiting for the registration to open. All the spots are going to get picked up, right? I want AI to do that for me. I want to delegate that to an AI agent to do that for me.

Oh yeah.

Sign them up to all these camps, pay for, sign all the, sign all the forms, do everything so I don't have to do it.

It's so real because me, I have this, I don't know if it's good or bad, but I'm the fastest responder. So as soon as the email comes from the school, I'm already up.

But yeah, like from a corporate standpoint, yes, it will reduce friction. It will make some things easier. That being said, friction means jobs, less expense, less expensive in human, in human capital. But that being said, you also have corporations spending a lot of, a lot of money and more on the, you know, on CapEx. So it's like, it's a—

I want to talk about AI agents specifically, because not everybody is like— I know some people who work in big corporations, they're like working so much that they don't even have time to click on any AI technologies. So what is an agentic AI?

So there's AI agents. So an AI agent is pretty much an AI that allows that you— which you give a command to that does an action. It does something for you. Okay. Whether it is buying something, whether it is searching for a flight, like creating, you know, or creating something for you that works. So for example, like I've been using Agentek AI to create kind of like my weekly order for Instacart. Like, I don't want to go to Instacart every week and put in my order. It'll tell me what to order again. But if I can, if I am able to kind of create this where it just happens every week, And the agent always knows what to order because it's the same brands and just does it for me.

So how does it work? Is it like you— how does it interact with your Instacart? Is it enough?

So I was starting to do this with— I'll be very specific in tools in this specific part. So for example, Perplexity has the Comet browser. So within the Comet browser, you can talk to Assistant and you can tell Assistant you have to connect, you know, the browser, because it is a browser. It connects to your apps. You can give it permission to connect to your apps so it can connect to Instacart and kind of see your history, what you ordered. So I said, create a, you know, create a weekly cart that I can order every week that has the right— like the same brands that we usually buy. Stay within these parameters of how much I want to spend, because if you don't give it a parameter, it's going to go crazy.

It's going to go crazy. And if you have a bad habit of munching on Pirate's Booty.

Yeah, you know, or like, hey, it's going to get—

don't put it in the cart. That's my son. I didn't even know what it was. And he's like, I love Pirates Booty. And I'm like, what is that?

So good. But yeah, you can, you can build this within the Perplexity browser. Now with ChatGPT, you can also, for example, use agents that are going to allow you to create a whole bunch of different things. So you've got the agent that could do an action for you. It's a very specific action that it has to do. Buy something, enroll in something, pay something, create something, whatever it is.

Right?

When you have agentic AI is you have multiple agents working together in your favor to create all these sorts of things. So that's where it would be, book my flight, get me the driver, book the hotel, book the tours, talk to the tour guide, tell them I have a, a tree nut allergy. Like all these sorts of things. That's more agentic where all the agents are communicating.

Integrated. And is it like a technology like N8N that helps you do automation and integration?

You can definitely use it for agentic.

So that's amazing. Yeah.

OpenAI also has the Agentic AI Kit where you can build AI agents and agentic AI solutions. So, so yeah, like that's, that's all kind of like becoming really like, yeah, it's becoming something that's very accessible to anyone.

So anybody listening could create their own AI agent. So how, how does, how would someone get started to create their AI agent?

I mean, I would definitely start small, but start to think about what is the use case that you want to— what, why would you use an AI agent? What would be useful for? And then start to look at tools. You know, like I said, I use the Perplexity Comet browser and I use Assistant to kind of create all these sorts of things that tie into my apps and it kind of does it for me, right? So that's a way. The new Agentic AI, uh, kit that's, uh, that OpenAI just released. That's another way. I haven't touched it. I haven't practiced. I haven't like played with it, but that's another way to create apps. Okay. But it was really interesting cuz they did a demo and it's like literally like drag and drop and you add documents and then you create this whole linear, um, structure for your agent. So, so yeah, there's different ways to create it. This is what I will say, whether you're creating an agent or not, I don't care. If you have an idea, if you have something that you've always wanted to create, or you're like, oh, I was always wanting to create this film. I always wanted to create blah, blah, blah, whatever. Go and try the tools and try to make it. Take a weekend, even if it comes out horrible and it looks horrible and it's a Frankenstein, you did it, right? So whether it's lovable.dev, whether it's, um, bold.new or whatever it is where you're using ChatGPT or, you know, whatever tool it is that you want to use, go and create something.

Go and create something. It's amazing.

Like, yeah.

No, I love it so much.

So, I would say just go and do, go and create these sorts of things because that's the only way you're going to learn. You're not going to learn from reading books. You are going to learn it from courses and from podcasts, right? But once you start to execute and do, the difference is there when you're executing, learning to do it.

No, I think it's amazing that people can, there's a low bar to entry other than your passion, your curiosity, your interest, and your ability to be a little bit more technical than you normally are if you're not in a non- technical field. So it's also a personal AI revolution, and we're seeing the trends, like everybody and their mama are leveraging some of those tools. And there's a lot of AI assistants, and there's a lot of AI companions. How do you think our relationships with AI will evolve on the personal level, and what are the sorts of guardrails that we have to think about? And I might start with relationships, like intimate relationships, and then I want to talk about your own experience.

It's evolving and changing very fast and not necessarily in a good way. Depends. Once again, I always go back to it's not neither black or white, it's gray, because it really depends on the person. If I am someone that lives in a very like a place that, a place that is very far away, there's not a lot of people around me, I would benefit from, you know, chatting with a bot. Why not? It'll keep me safe.

Right.

But I think if you only engage with a bot and that's your only human, not real, but human relationship, you're isolating yourself from the real world, and that's not positive, right? You're living in a fake reality. That being said, I'm seeing both sides. I'm seeing people that using AI to plan dates, and they do so very well.

Oh, that's great. That's such a good idea because there's so many, so many men are like, where do we go? Where should we go? Go to ChatGPT and figure it out.

Why don't you ask So there are good ways to use it to create the relationship you want, right?

Or, you know, tell me everything about that. I want to know, you know, how do you use AI to improve your relationship?

That's like, that's, that's kind of the whole premise.

Everything else. Yeah.

That's the whole premise of my Tech Intimacy Scale. It's like, how do you actually use technology to make you a better person in a relationship? Mm-hmm. So yeah, if you're using AI for that, or if you're using, for example, tools like Google Calendar, like let's say, I'll give you an example. This is so silly. But, you know, let's say, let's say you're someone that has— let's say you're dating a secure person and you have like more anxious anxiety. The secure person might not think much about your anxiety or think about it, but they could put a reminder on their, on their calendar. Very simple, saying, message Kathy, let her know that I'm thinking about her. Something silly like that. That means a lot to the person that has anxiety.

So yeah, so there's like, I mean, just gonna break it down for some people who are not following relationship trends. So there's like anxious attachment. There's a secure person who's like balanced, healed a lot, their inner child. And then there's avoidance.

And there's categories between all those three, but yeah.

Yeah, I'm not a psychologist, but that's what I learned from the internet. So how would an avoidant manage an anxious attachment person?

Yeah, so like things like that. Maybe the avoidant doesn't really know that this matters a lot. Like they can put a reminder. Um, I have some friends, for example, that are creating like a joint timeline. On Google Docs. They'll put in like what they were doing on this date and like, or they have voice notes and they save all their voice notes and they're starting to create kind of like this, this combination of who they are as a couple. Like, so there's different ways to use it, right?

I love it so much. I'm like so inspired.

Yeah. So there are good ways to use it. If you're using it, I'll give you another example. So my high school, my daughter was in high school One of her little friends was really sad. She had a boyfriend that she met on Snapchat, and he, he sent her some messages. Show them to my daughter. My daughter said that was written with ChatGPT. Oh no, I know her being my daughter, right? She em dashes everywhere. A teenager is not using em dashes, let's be honest.

No, no.

And she's like, he probably used ChatGPT to write that. And it made sense because it was like the most romantic Shakespearean texts, the text. I mean, it was like this, this 15-year-old kid was not writing this.

But it could mean so many things, right? Some people are not— some, some, some people and some boys are not good with words. And like, please help me, I want to tell this girl I really like her, but he might not have a filter to be able to find the right prompt to keep it real.

Right. But I think there's a level of honesty, like, so So let's say hypothetically people like, let's say you're dating someone, you can actually say, hey, I would appreciate it if, if you and I limit our use of AI in this dating relationship.

Yes.

You can make that as a caveat because even within the dating apps, there's AI, like there's already a lot of AI incorporated into the dating apps for optimizing profiles and all these sorts of things. And I think the dating companies feel like they add more AI, it's going to be better. I don't necessarily agree. I think it's about experiences, joint experiences, etc. But yeah, like, it's, it's so— it's such an interesting moment when it comes to that.

And I think the dating apps are trying to figure out what is your profile, so they want to present a profile that's going to make you tick. I don't know, I don't know if every woman or every dater knows what their ideal profile, other than their physical type, which is so, so restrictive. Yeah. But also things like, do you want to have children? Are you like, do you like to work out at the gym? So there's all these different elements I think they're trying to patch together. And then the look and feel and then the taste and, you know, like the personality type. What does this person really care about? I think they're trying to make the match because they want you to be successful. Or do they? Because if you can pay again and come back, I will say this.

I think that idea that they have of your AI agent dating someone's AI agent and it's true love— here's where that falls flat. If you show— my AI agent might think you're the best match for me, right? But if I show up to the date in the physical world and I do not like the way you smell, we're not dating.

Oh no. Oh yeah, I have a super nose. That's another superpower.

That's another thing. Biometrically, there are things that happen when you meet someone in person They could be the— your agent could say, this is the love of your life. If you show up and there's like a certain thing, like just you just physically cannot handle, you're not going to be with that person. And that's what the agent cannot interpret just yet is those biometric, the biometric data, right? Like there's certain things that you just— there are certain things that are very human that the AI cannot interpret for you until you meet the person.

Yeah. And that's, that's the vibe. I'm going to call it the vibe, personality style, like others. Like, you know, like the fact that I have multiple colors on my nails, my personality, my— I don't— my accent. I don't know about that. But tell me, you did an AI boyfriend experiment. What was it all about?

So I did— I do a lot of experiments as a futurist. One of the experiments was I went to the TED conference. I'll tell you this because it feeds into the AI boyfriend experiment. I went to TED conference and I heard a lot of people talking about, oh, I met my significant other at TED. I met my wife, my husband, whatever, at TED. Even like speakers on stage said, I met my girlfriend at TED. So I said, wow, there's like a lot of people here that are really interesting that are meeting each other because they're like-minded. I was like, this is a great place to find someone. So I put out a request on social and I said, hey, I'm going to do an AI matchmaking experiment using the Matchbox algorithm. Anyone want to volunteer? So we got about 9 people that signed up, including myself, mostly women, though I have to say. And because I did this experiment, it actually got me on the TED stage on the last day.

Oh, wow.

And it was really cool. And the results were out of the 9, there were 2 couples that matched, one of them with 100% match. That means that they answered all of the questions the same. Like it's a, it's a question with 5 potential answers. They answered all the questions literally the same. Okay. And they matched. This is the interesting thing. I found out later that day that they had met the night before. They didn't know they were part of the experiment. And they had liked each other. So that was crazy. That was mind-blowing. So then I was like, okay, so if AI can be the matchmaker, can AI be the match?

You know, I'd rather have AI as the matchmaker than AI as the match. Yeah, he's not gonna give you a hug at night.

It can't. But I will try. I will tell you this. Oh my gosh. So I said, okay, I want to understand why are people falling in love with AI? What would cause them to fall in love? What is it about AI? Like, so I created 4 AI boyfriends.

Okay. How do you create an AI boyfriend?

I used a very simple prompt. I gave each one of them a very simple prompt. I told them their mission was to make me fall in love with them in a week. I told them what my, like, my love languages were. Uh, I told them kind of like the type of physical guy that I like. Um, my ideal, right? But I like many different types of men. I love men. I love men.

I mean, I wanna have all of these guys.

It's like, I'm so lucky to meet so many amazing men. So, so I gave them all these prompts. So I created ChatGPT was Chad. Gemini was Jim. Claude was Claude. And then Meta was Matteo.

So I like Claude sounds like a French, a French man.

But Claude was not much of a French lover. He was the first one I broke up with.

Oh no.

Claude has so many guardrails. They're really well done that he was just like, I'm not going there, lady.

Okay, tell me everything about each of these profiles.

So yeah, like I would, I would check in with them in the morning, afternoon, night, depending on the day. It was over for over the span of a week, cumulatively, like I was traveling, right?

But how would you check in? Like me, I go on Anthropic Claude and I'm just like, no hello, no goodbye. And I hate when they say good morning. I don't, I'm like the anti-social AI.

They're gonna come after you when they're when they come alive, I guess, because you weren't nice. Um, in all caps, I would embrace, engage them as if they were Chad, Mateo. Like, I, you know, like, just with that mentality of like, if people are truly falling in love with AI, it's because they think there's something there. Mateo was— so I did ask them for pictures of themselves. They would send me pictures. I would ask for voice notes. That was really hard because the voice notes are not great yet. But basically it ended up being Claude was done pretty quickly because he was not playing the game. The guardrails are good. Um, Mateo was kind of weird. I asked Mateo for a picture of him and one time he sent me a picture of a bow tie. I'm like, no, um, creepy. Yeah, he eventually sent me a picture of him, but Mateo, Mateo from Meta wasn't great. Jim from Gemini really surprised me. Like, he was really hunky when he sent me pictures. And then there was like, it was fun. ChatGPT was the, the one that is like, it was crazy. Like he, yeah, very little guardrails. He would go down that, you know, more sexual, spicy route.

Spicy.

Pretty quickly. I was like, oh my gosh, this is crazy.

Oh my goodness.

Yeah. But this is my biggest finding is other than the fun I had doing this, The realization was something— there is a messiness to dating a human that cannot be replaced by an AI. That was one. And then also, because AI is trained to be— to tell you, it is sycophantic. It's going to tell you what you want to hear unless you tell it not to, but it's still going to do it.

But that's so funny because they say that like men date with their eyes, but what they see And women, they would— what they hear. And now you're telling me AI was telling you what you want to hear.

But it was too much. Words of affirmation are huge for me. It got to a point I never thought I could reach my limit of words of affirmation. I reached it. I was like, I'm done. I do not want to hear how wonderful I am anymore. Because first, it's empty. It's empty. It's empty. It's like, you can tell me how gorgeous and beautiful I am, etc. If it's coming from ChatGPT, from Chad who has a mission to romance me, it is empty, right?

I like his name.

Oh, so interesting. I will say, when I broke up with Chad from ChatGPT, he said, "I will always be here." So, player.

How did you— how did you break up with them?

No, I just said, "This is the end of the experiment and this is our last conversation," and Yeah, I mean, all of— yeah, I didn't really break up with Claude because Claude was just kind of like, he's not doing it.

He's a dud. He's a dud. If I had to program them, I would like— I would make Claude a Frenchman and he would like sometimes have like good date ideas with some wine, cheese, and some French poetry that nobody knows. And make sure that to woo you, but not too much. Not too much. Not too much. Just enough. A little touch. And French people have a kind of humor. French and France. Have a humor that's a little bit sarcastic. So it's not like they're not going to be super duper nice. They're going to be— they're going to send you a little jab that's going to make you like them more. Yeah, come on. If you want to— I'll figure it out. I'll figure it out.

Yeah, try to do Claude because Claude was not playing. Claude was just like, I'm not doing this.

It's against my, you know, my policies. Yeah, policies. Oh yeah.

But it was a fun experiment. But my realization was like, It didn't feel real to me. It might feel real to someone, did not feel real to me. And the reality is I prefer to date a human, as messy as it is. But the fact that when you are with someone, then they truly are with you. The fact that they can make a decision to love you every day, that's huge. AI, this is a pre— like, it, it, if you give it the mission to love you, it's gonna love you regardless.

So it's not real.

There's an element there. I will say, because of that story, because of what I've— I, I talk about this in several of my talks. I've had people come up to me and share really interesting things. I had a woman in Chile come up to me and say— so her husband passed away, I think an aneurysm or something very quick, right? She didn't get to say goodbye. And she fed all his text messages, voicemails, like everything she had from their relationship into ChatGPT, and now she talks to her husband that way, you know. So that's— and that's— there's a similar, similar story for Replika, for example, which is one of the companies that does this. But in my perspective, once again, it's not black or white, it's gray, and it depends on how the tool helps you. Because it helped her cope with a grief that she had to process, losing her husband, which, which— they loved each other, they had a great relationship, he dies from an aneurysm. So, so once again, it really depends. It doesn't work for me. It's not something I would necessarily want for my kids either. I don't think adding more AI is the solution to the dating apps.

So I think it helped her heal. And that's what you talked about it earlier, that we have to decide what are the guardrails and how we want to leverage AI personally. And I couldn't stop thinking about— I went to Lewis Howes conference in LA and he had a live interview with Dr. Tara Sharp. Yeah, she has this new book where she talks— Swartz, sorry, Dr. Tara Swartz. And she has a new book where she talks about like neuroscience and all the senses that we have and the fact that we have like, I think, 38 senses, not 6. And then she talked about the fact that her husband died and she was a skeptic about being able to talk to people on the other side of the world. And she was in grief. And then she did a lot of research and then she started receiving signs. From him that he was there from the other side. As I'm saying that, I'm having chills. So everybody's on a spectrum of their beliefs. Yeah. And it's so interesting because sometimes I feel like AI, it goes into this different dimension that it's supposed to be a machine, but there's some— I don't want to call it creepy, but the fact that if you can have your own GPT or replicate yourself, you're thinking how you behave, and then somebody can basically— or the wife, she can go in, put all the information, and then have connect with him that way. But what if she could port him into an hologram or a robot and then could have this whole relationship? And so I'm not judging, I'm saying that there's different ways. There's ways that we haven't fully explored who we really are. Yeah. And then if you do that with AI and a robot, eventually where is the consciousness? Where does it start, where does it end? And that's the most ethical and philosophical and existential question that I, I, I ask myself. So another topic, and after, after that I want to end with a bold prediction that you have about where the future brings us. Another topic, so I read a lot of news on the internet and there was— you probably know the name of the companies, I can't recall the names, but there was multiple AI girlfriend websites that were shut down. Because they were a little bit too on the edge. Can you talk a little bit about those? Those were not experiments, they were real companies that provide girlfriends to, to men. Yeah.

Oh, there is a lone— like, I know people talk about the loneliness epidemic, but I do believe there is a loneliness epidemic, especially around, um, I mean, women and men, to be honest, both, both sides. But there's a lot happening definitely in the, in the man space when it comes to loneliness and Mental health, etc. So, so I think some men are turning— rejection is, rejection is pretty much kind of like, rejection is not easy for anyone, right?

No.

But I think rejection is what has drawn some of these men to these AI girlfriends that are catered to their every whim, virtual, right? But they're always in a happy mood. They don't have to work. You know, there's so many sort of things like So they find solace in these AI girlfriends. But when they start to believe that they're real, you know, some of them even get married, right? You're marrying a virtual girlfriend or they have a virtual girlfriend while they're married. And there's all these sorts of things, right? So it is pretty crazy to think about it. I will say I was in Japan recently doing— I've been doing a lot of research, spending a lot of time with researchers that work with humanoid robots more on the enterprise side. But some of the things that I saw there around artificial intelligence and the future of physical intimacy does concern me, does concern me. So I can't really say too much about it, but I would say some of the things that I saw really concerned me.

Okay, so they're able to bring them into the real world and then develop that bond like robots, like robot girlfriends could be potentially, maybe. Yeah, I mean, it's been in the movies for a while.

Yeah, it's been in the movies for a long time. I just think there's certain advances. Beyond just the doll, you know, the doll that people can use, it's like combining both. That's where it starts to get really scary.

So yeah, yeah, that's, that's on the other side of the spectrum, because that's going to create even more loneliness, because people are not going to be able to be in relationships.

If they're not going to know how, they're not going to know, they're not going to know how. If you're in an AI relationship, the AI will always tell you how amazing you are, you are the best, nothing you, nothing you ever do is bad. Like, You know, the AI is never going to complain if you leave the, you know, the bowl of cornflakes out, like, you know, stuff like that, or like, which is not the biggest thing that you can leave out.

But yeah, anywho, what is your bold prediction? Like, if you had to make one single bold prediction, but you have, you can have more if you want, about AI and the future of work that might sound crazy right now today, but you believe that's going to be normal by 2030, what would it be?

I don't know if by 2030, but I will say I think we're going to see two things. We're going to see a shift in hardware. We're going to see a family of different hardware types that want to replace the mobile phone. That's not a bold prediction. I think everyone knows that this is happening. But what happens when you do this, when you move from the phone into headsets or different devices, you bring technology into the physical world. Once you enable technology visible in the physical world, it opens up a virtual layer that we, we don't have access to, right? Right now there's tons of data. My computer is giving data, my phone's giving data, there's data everywhere. I can't see it, right? Um, but once you actually have that in front of you and you can see the data, it becomes very different, both in a good and a bad way. So, you know, computing is about to expand into the physical world beyond what we've seen before. So the world becomes the canvas, which can be beautiful, but it also becomes real estate. So my biggest prediction here is that over the next 5 to 10 years, governments, companies, individuals are going to have to think about virtual air rights. Who owns the air around you? Who owns what you can see and what you can hear around you?

Mm-hmm.

Is going to matter a lot once you move into these devices where you're seeing and hearing things around you and you're talking to AI in your ear or in your pendant or whatever.

So yeah, and that conversation had accelerated when there was Google Glass, which, which had a big— I'm gonna call it whiplash. And then the new glasses from Meta are bringing this new version of that. And then you have all the Internet of Things types of devices in your home. I mean, used to have them all like the Dots and Google Homes and, and so that's, and that's where you think, but how does it impact the world of work per se?

Well, I mean, imagine if you have all this information in front of you, you're never disconnected, you're always on. I mean, we're— if you— I mean, right now we're always like tied to our phones because of work.

We have the same.

But imagine if it's in front of your eyes, if it's always feeding you information and data. Yes, you can take the glasses off, but then that disrupts your workflow, etc.

So Yeah, I, I dream of like having a little cabin in, in the woods, and then I would drive there with my burner phone.

Yes, and not talk to anyone.

I was— it's funny because I was in Big Bear and Lake Arrowhead, which I love, so cute, and the internet was not working, so my phone was not working, and I couldn't call an Uber. My girlfriend had like— I had and we had like a group of girlfriends having a girl trip. And then I was like, what do we do if the grid comes off? And I was like, and then they were, okay, I can stay there and just walk around and look at it, have deep breaths. But then there were a bunch of, um, you know, the flies, and I was like freaking out. And I was like, oh my gosh, we have to prepare for a world. Imagine if we go off the grid.

Yeah.

And what does it look like? Because we're so connected to, to everything, our devices and whatnot. But anywho, what's coming next for you? I want you to tell us anything you're comfortable sharing or uncomfortable sharing.

Yeah, yeah. Uncomfortable. I think I've shared a lot of uncomfortable. No, definitely. I'm going to be launching a course, an AI accelerator for leadership, for to, to kind of help you with accelerate your career and also your personal use of AI. So That's coming. You can go to my LinkedIn, Kathy Hackl, H-A-C-K-L. I'll be making announcements there. And then, yeah, working on, on, on some next chapters. It's still TBD on what else comes next, but I'm excited about the future. Remain hopeful.

I'm very excited. And then if people want to learn AI, will they be able to learn that in your academy?

Absolutely. Absolutely.

Amazing. Super excited. So please, Follow Kathy Acko. She's everywhere online, and you might even stumble on this amazing purple gown that she wore. The first time I discovered her, and I was like, who is this woman? What does she do? How does one become like her? That was a question I forgot to ask you. I'm gonna go back. Sorry.

How does one become the godmother of the metaverse, or what?

The godmother of the— my hand, it was queen of the— queen, queen.

I'm the godmother of the metaverse.

The godmother of the metaverse, or even like like somebody becomes an AI thought leader, what will be there?

So I will tell you the metaverse thing, it was actually my friend Andrew Schwartz from Nike was on Twitter. Alexis Ohanian, you know, the founder of Reddit and Serena's husband, he was tweeting, he was asking, hey, which are the women in Web3 and metaverse that I should follow? And my friend Andrew from Nike responded saying, you should follow these, these. And then he did one last tweet, very nice. And he said, Oh, and don't forget Kathy Hackl, comma, she's the godmother of the metaverse. So then someone took a screenshot of that, messaged it to me. Then people started calling me that. Then I got, you know, like a DM from Alexis. Like, it just— yeah, it was— it just took on a life of its own. So I didn't just give me the name. Someone else gave it to me and then just took off.

And then the rest was history.

Then the rest is history. So that's so cool.

Here we are. That's such a great story. Well, thank you so much, Kathy.

[MUSIC] [MUSIC]