A short YouTube discussion (Mark Evans DM) asking whether chasing creative financing deals is good or bad. Speakers note it depends on the buyer's cash-flow needs and purpose for the asset, then discuss a concrete example comparing a creative takeover payment (eight thousand/month) versus market rent (six thousand/month) for an office building.
Chasing creative financing deals Good thing or bad thing? Here's the thing is it depends. Do you have other.
Cash flow streams?
Why are you purchasing the asset? Is it for your business to grow? If I do a creative deal on.
An office building that I have my team in and I'm spending ten grand a month and the seller needs out of it for whatever reason, I can take it over for eight grand a month.
But market rent's.
Only 6,000amonth.
Is that a good deal or bad deal?
For me as the company owner, I'm already in the business paying ten, so now I'm paying eight. I save two grand a month. It comes down to your business accolades. Understanding the Plan with the Asset Every asset is independent and itself. It's like a mini business. Each asset has to have its particular goal and agenda. They don't always work out. Part of the game is understanding how to work things out when it's not working out.
