Your staff meeting sounds like a sabotage manual

16 Sept 2026 · 1 min

Watch on YouTube

1:01

In this YouTube commentary, the speaker draws a direct line between the 1944 OSS Simple Sabotage Field Manual—originally designed to covertly disrupt enemy organizations—and common dysfunctional behaviors observed in modern corporate meetings. By listing specific sabotage tactics such as introducing irrelevant issues, reopening settled decisions, insisting on rigid procedural channels, and obsessively haggling over wording, the speaker argues that these practices unintentionally mirror deliberate sabotage, making it hard for groups to reach decisions. The talk concludes with a call to recognize these patterns, even when participants are not intentionally sabotaging, as a way to improve meeting effectiveness.

Chapters

The CIA wrote a sabotage manual that sounds exactly like your staff meeting. In 1944, the Office of Strategic Services, the predecessor to the CIA, published the Simple Sabotage Field Manual. It taught people how to quietly disrupt enemy organizations. Now, some of its tactics for meetings: bring up irrelevant issues, reopen decisions that were already settled, insist everything go through proper channels so nobody can take shortcuts, Haggle over the exact wording of minutes and communications. Does that sound familiar? I've sat in corporate meetings where people do every one of those things without being recruited as enemy agents. There's a reason these tactics were in a sabotage manual. They make it painfully difficult for a group to decide and move. So when somebody reopens last Tuesday's decision or starts a 15-minute argument over one sentence, recognize what's happening. They may not mean to sabotage the meeting, but they're doing a pretty good impression.