Andrew Yang Too Nice?/ UBI Good Economy/Joe Biden #YangGang

In this YouTube commentary, the host examines whether Andrew Yang is "too nice" to confront Donald Trump, arguing that Yang's analytical, mathematically‑oriented style does not equate to weakness. The video promotes the BitcoinNYK.com platform, which offers a universal basic income (UBI) system and a "Market Predictor" tool that lets users wager on political and market outcomes for prizes tied to UBI credits. The host then critiques the narrative that the current strong U.S. economy (high GDP, low unemployment) is solely the result of recent policies, warning that aggregate data can mask everyday struggles. Polling data and its reliability are discussed, with a focus on Joe Biden’s surge in the Democratic primary, his campaign tactics, and the perceived continuity of the Obama‑Clinton establishment. The speaker predicts that Yang could gain momentum if given more media exposure, especially through longer interview formats, and urges viewers to join the BitcoinNYK.com UBI platform and participate in a poll on Yang’s perceived niceness.
Chapters
Hey you, welcome back to the channel. And today we want to talk Andrew Yang. Is Andrew Yang too nice? In particular, specifically, and going up against Donald Trump. So we're going to delve into that a little bit today. Also, uh, We have a cool new feature on our website, BitcoinNYK.com. What is BitcoinNYK.com? It is a website that gives universal basic income to the entire globe. So if you're into a universal basic income, join our website. And so you can start earning credits that go to establishing universal basic income for the entire world. Now, interesting enough, we have Andrew Yang up here, which is part of our new feature of the site, and that's called the Market Predictor. And what is the Market Predictor? Well, it helps us to establish outcomes of upcoming events. It could be anything from elections to the stock market to sentiment on particular incidents that's happened in the world. And, uh, the market sentiment is gathered. And, uh, if you're part of the group that, uh, predicts the outcome, or you have the most, um, uh, uh, people that support the idea, you win prizes. You win prizes that go along with your universal basic income into the platform. So pretty cool stuff. Make sure you join today. But interesting enough, uh, testing out the market predictor, we have that very question posed. Andrew Yang, is he too nice to face up against Donald Trump? So let's talk about that a little bit today. So it wasn't very long ago, um, during Andrew Yang's campaign that people were saying, well, you know, Andrew Yang is, uh, not very emotional. He's almost like a robot. Right? He just kind of cites these figures and all this math and stuff. And so I think how I look at it, when I think of people that are deep into mathematics and logic and a variety of things like that, uh, many things come to mind. Maybe not always, uh, nice is the idea. And not saying that nice is, is, is a bad thing, you know, nice, you know, the idea nice guys finish last, that may not always be true. And, uh, you know, being polite is sometimes the best way to go about things, but there's also a time and a period where you need to be assertive and you need to, uh, be stern and get things done. And being the president of the United States, there are going to be many situations like that where you have to answer to situations and conditions that aren't the very best, right? That aren't the, uh, situations that, uh, would be something that would be desirable for you. Uh, so Andrew, Andrew Yang, mathematician, kind of falls somewhat, or to some kind of fell under that umbrella of the logic, not very emotional candidate. So how does he go from that to being too nice? Has, um, come up in several articles, uh, that I've run across? Well, I think for me, I don't think nice is the right category for what Andrew Yang's, his, how he presents himself. I see him as quite jovial at times, right? He's kind of humorous and funny and that's cool. But I don't think he really falls in that category. You know, also interesting enough, when people made the comparison between Andrew Yang and Donald Trump, how he would fare in a direct debate between Donald Trump, I think the real question though is everybody's kind of going to be under that umbrella of on the receiving end of Donald Trump. Uh, you know, many people know that Donald Trump, he, you know, he goes for the for the kill shots and the blows, maybe even the low blows. And so a lot of politicians who are accustomed to doing things certain ways are going to probably find themselves much out of their element with Donald Trump. So I think kind of singling Andrew Yang out in this, I don't think it's, you know, anything that is pointed specifically to him being too nice. There are several other candidates I can think of that will probably fall under the many similar claims to Andrew Yang. If we go back to when Donald Trump won his election, maybe some might think Jeb Bush was too nice, right? How he kind of just, mopped the floor with Jeb Bush. So many candidates are going to face this, but I don't think nice is the right word. I, you know, I think it's a, I think I look at Andrew Yang as a mix between a mathematical person and a jovial person. But I've seen, he has shown several times where he could be quite serious about things and how to deal with stuff. And, You know, I could see where he can be very, uh, be a person who doesn't really fit the category so much. Definitely not the category of too nice. Nice is fine, but too nice is generally going to be too much for, for people. So anyway, uh, we got that poll set up. We'd love for you guys to participate. And, um, if you're in the— if you're in agreement with the, with the largest to Andrew Yang, uh, being either too nice or not falling in that category too nice, uh, we got some prizes for you all to, to win. So make sure you join and participate. Let's talk next about, um, universal basic income in a good economy. Uh, you know, the idea is out that Trump has, you know, based on GDP numbers, you know, he's produced this better economy. Now we know how politics works. So I hope we— many of us understand by now that the economy doesn't change overnight, and the economy is generally a process that could be, uh, a result of many policies from years back, administrations past, and a variety of things. And so, you know, of course, what generally we get is administrations who take credit, of course, for good administrations— I mean, I'm sorry, good economic conditions, right? Whether it's their doing or somebody else's. But when they're bad, um, economic situations, they're very quick to say, well, it's the fault of somebody else's. And they don't— they won't own that, that present economy. But they will own that present economy when it's, uh, you know, when it's favorable for them to do so. Then they will say, I did it, right? So that's, that's pretty interesting. Um, so universal basic income in, in a good economy. So many more articles I found, uh, have said things like Andrew Yang is the apocalyptic president, right? He's the person who should become president when the world's coming to an end. Because, you know, the, the narrow short-sightedness that we have as human beings Um, it's just something I think is kind of inherent right now to being human because, you know, we can very much see, uh, a serious set of circumstances coming and we can so easily go, well, we got a few more years for this, and kind of wait to the last minute and try to put something together. And, uh, instead of addressing the problem now, we're it can be fine-tuned and efficient enough to deal with what's going to be a major problem. But we'll wait to the last year and then say, okay, well now it's time to look for that person who's addressing what's the serious problem that's on the horizon. Uh, so some people go there with it and say, well, UBI should be used for these apocalyptic futuristic dystopian-like conditions, right? And then you have, uh, uh, uh, just looking at the GDP numbers themselves, and then you come to the conclusion of, uh, are these numbers real or is it more polling data? And, and let me say this about polling data. Polling data in many cases is all we have to go on. That is very true. And we should use polling data and we need to do that to get some indicator But it's also very important to note that with all that said, that doesn't necessarily mean polling data is accurate, right? It doesn't mean that it is true. For instance, Joe Biden's, uh, polling numbers right now, uh, how many people believe that's true? Uh, maybe it is, and, and, you know, okay. But anyway, let's get back to that. So You know, many times when we're dealing with GDP numbers or unemployment numbers, we get a lot of, uh, the story left out of those numbers, right? Like with unemployment, we get people who just gave up on going to work, right? And they just, you know, they couldn't find a job, so they kind of just went outside of those numbers. And now people think that, uh, oh, well, they're unemployed now, or things are better. Well, not necessarily so. And with these supposedly great GDP numbers and a variety of things that's supposed to be creating all these positive effects, why don't we just take a test with that, right? You look at yourself, is your life, are you seeing the improvements? Are you reaping the rewards and benefits of what's being suggested in the data? When you talk to your friends and family, are they in a better position than they were? Because I, I think many will find that maybe it doesn't sound as good as they seem to make it sound, right? Like we're in this booming, great economy, but where people still struggling to make ends meet, they're struggling to get bills paid. They still gotta work 2, 3 jobs. And that's the reality of a lot of people's lives, right? With that, right? Like Andrew Yang brings out, a lot of the mom-and-pop establishments and businesses and local— in their local economies are still disappearing. And, um, you know, all these negative effects are still abound. Uh, so we got to be careful when we try to go in in that mindset like everything's all right just because the data suggests that. And so we got to be Careful with that. Um, you know, next, uh, Joe Biden. So we've been looking at Joe Biden's polls and, and he's just leading. He's flew past Bernie Sanders. And again, to me, this is another Democrat, some kind of problem in the Democrat camp that I don't understand. Uh, so Joe Biden just comes in and he flies past Bernie Sanders and He passed everybody. And I think his, the main idea behind his, I think one of his first campaign, his big campaign ads had to do something about what happened with Donald Trump in Charlottesville, right? And I just found that interesting that he went there with that. And I imagine he went there on Donald Trump with the Charlottesville thing and made his campaign the big thing about that was because, you know, maybe he was buying as well, buying into the GDP data and all that as well and saying, We're in a booming, great economy. So it's not, I can't hit Trump there. So let's try to hit him back on this racism thing happened in Charlottesville. And my take on that is, yeah, they're using that to try to turn voters. I don't know exactly who they're turning away from Trump because I think in that whole particular ad, I think with Trump, the people either accepted him as a racist already and are gonna vote for him anyway, or didn't. I don't think there's any new revelation, you know, about what happened in Charlottesville that points to Trump being a racist or not to the point it's going to affect his voters in that area. So I just thought that was a weird campaign ad to go in. But again, maybe he did that because he didn't have much more else to go with. But Joe Biden is also— isn't he kind of this throwback to this strange union with the Obama administration and the Clinton administration. And what I'm saying about this, I'm not necessarily demonizing the Obama administration because, you know, as we know, Obamacare came out of that and Obama did some great things. But him choosing Joe Biden, uh, just some kind of some strange things as we go back into history and look at Joe Biden. Uh, I'm not sure why he chose him either, really, But it's just some strange ideas with Joe Biden and the disentanglement of the Obama administration with the Clintons. And the reason I make that statement that way is because it just brings the question home. Is it that the Democrats didn't want just the same? You know, it doesn't seem like the Democrats really want to change anything, right? You're going back to, those, those ideas and concepts of these type of, uh, a liberal base that caters to the establishment politics. Still, nothing really changes with that. Um, and it just seems like just more of an extension of that, right? And so that's where I'm confused about how he jumps in. Everybody goes, oh yeah, we'll vote for Joe Biden. Now another thing is It's the idea— I remember watching a political movie, uh, years ago with the comic Eddie Murphy called Distinguished Gentleman, where he wins a Congress seat just based on picking a name that was well known. It was something like Thomas Jefferson, uh, something like that. Maybe kind of play on Bill Clinton too. And, uh, the people were just voting on him because they liked his name. They recognized his name. Is that what's happening with Joe Biden? I think people are just latching on to just to know— they know who Joe Biden is, and that's what generally happens, right? You know, it's sad to say, but Americans are a lot smarter now. Technology, the internet— we are a lot smarter than we used to be, right? But in politics, a lot of American base, we're still not that political savvy to the point where we'll just go to places people were familiar with without even really looking at the policies, looking at the past of the policies, or looking at the conditions that we were under with these people. And so you take somebody like Joe Biden, who he does this slogan about the racism and trying to link it to Donald Trump, but then we find out when we go back to the mid-'90s, he was a big advocate for the crime bill that actually has affected minority groups 1, uh, and, uh, you know, so he was involved with a lot of that as well. But yet at the same time, you know, and he had some little different little statements he made about Obama that some kind of seen as, you know, not real cool. Uh, and so some people trying to understand why Joe Biden was selected by, by Obama, you know, to begin with. But, uh, it's the familiarity, right? It's just the people latching on to what they know. Uh, and just saying it's Joe Biden. We remember him from the Obama administration. He was the vice president, right? Um, and I, and to me that just signals that the Democratic Party wants no change whatsoever whatsoever. The polls and the data are showing us that. What are we, what are, what is the Democratic Party doing? Right. It is showing us that now, you know, again, you start off leading in the polls. That doesn't mean you're going to finish off like that, you know, but the way Joe Biden just came in and flew past Bernie Sanders without even like a fight or tussle, that's quite concerning, isn't it? Um, I think Andrew Yang's in a good position now. I think we're going to, Andrew's going to come up, come up out of the, out of nowhere where it's going to appear that way to to a lot of candidates when he comes up. And I think he's gonna shoot up real high over these debates because I think a lot of people are gonna realize that, hey, we hear something better in this Andrew Yang guy. We don't want any more of that past Biden, Clinton, Obama administration stuff. You know, we want something new now, all right? And I think it's gonna probably hit them when those debates and Andrew Yang starts to, 'cause it only takes a few minutes to listen to Andrew Yang. A lot of people haven't listened to Andrew Yang yet, to convince, and he can convince a lot of people once they give him 10, 15 minutes. So the problem is a lot of time they don't give him a lot of time. You know, he's got to try to sell you on universal basic income, a concept that's scary to people they've never heard before, in like 5 minutes on these shows, right? The media coverage, like 5 minutes for him to do that. Uh, I've been hearing something about he's going to be on the, this, the, um, the, uh, the— was it Tonight Show? I think Stephen Colbert Show or something like that. So that'll give him a little bit more press as well. So the more he can get out in the media and, and, uh, getting their eye and getting on. I think that that's gonna, uh, you know, be a good thing. Um, but, uh, I think that's all I want to say in this video, guys. But, uh, get over to the website, uh, our Universal Basic Income website. I think it's gonna be good for you all who, who watch the channel. Don't delay, do it today. Get those advantages that you so much deserve and participate. Let us know If you think Andrew Yang is too nice to be the president of the United States, he's too nice to go up against Donald Trump. Let us know what you think in the polls. We'll leave a link in the description. That's all I want to say in this video. If you like content like this, don't forget to like, subscribe, and until next time, take care.
More from Michael

UBI - CIA Agent Explains Why Americans Will Never Get Universal Basic Income?










