A case for BitcoinMYK over Twitter. Elon Musk paid $44 billion for Twitter, took out loans, laid people off, and called it a bad investment. BitcoinMYK lets users vote on who stays on the platform and distributes rewards based on participation instead of shareholders.
Welcome back to the channel, and I am quite convinced that BitcoinMYK is better than Twitter, right? So Twitter sold for something like $44 billion, right? Elon Musk had to take out some loans. He had to get— as rich as he is, he, you know, this tremendous amount of money to get access to, even for him. So he had to, you know, take out loans, partners and such. And, you know, his confession was that it was a bad investment, right? In one of his latest interviews, podcasts he was on, you know, he was saying it was a bad investment and that a lot of the Twitter accounts were bots. And to me, the worst part of the entire ordeal was that, you know, he ends up laying off a lot of workers, right? The best part about Twitter was probably that it was supplying jobs to people who needed them, right? So, you know, but, you know, the law says shareholders have to make money. And so Elon Musk going in, uh, was trimming the fat. Uh, maybe it was that, or maybe he just didn't like the liberal ideas, uh, that, you know, goes around Twitter. You know, whatever the case may be, it seemingly was a disaster. Now BitcoinMYK is 100 times better, um, than Twitter. Number one, you don't have to deal with a board of directors, right, as the owners and the shareholders as such, right? That's because all of you the network is pretty much controlled by you all, right? Another problem with these, you know, these big social media, you know, gigantic corporations is that basically you have you know, people on either side. They want some people to stay on the platform, they want some people off, to the point that, uh, President of the United States was kicked off, right? Uh, and you know, as bad as some people think Donald Trump is, he was the president, but he was removed from Twitter. So the thing is, I don't believe you can— it has to be an either-or situation where you throw the baby out with the bathwater. In other words, you know, people are saying things like, oh, the pedophiles are coming for our children and such, right? Uh, and so for people who are gung-ho on censorship resistance and such, what do you do about those people? What do you, what do you do about the dangerous people, right, online? So a lot of times their, their, their solution is, well, you know, uh, you know, you don't remove them, right? You let them stay on and, and so on, right? That's the best thing they come up with. Which is going to be unacceptable to over half the population off time. So that's why Bitcoin and YK is so much better. We have a government governance token, and as a community, as a group, we're allowed to vote on who stays and who goes, right? We don't just go, well, uh, everybody should stay, because that's ridiculous, right? You know, you're putting your children in harm's way, you're putting everybody in harm's way, right, for various things. Right? Laws are being broken as such, you know, hate speech and hate crime organizations of terrorist groups as such. And so what we try to do, those of us who support censorship resistance, is we throw the baby out with the bathwater, which is a problem. We don't have to do that. And so BitcoinMYK gets everything right. It's the best distribution system. You earn the cryptocurrency on attention value, right? You earn attention value on your participation as such. So no whale, no centralized entity, whether it be shareholders or what have you, or just some huge, uh, syndicate of whales that are controlling the network. That won't fly on Bitcoin MYK. Not only does it make it better than Twitter. I think it makes it the best cryptocurrency out there, uh, you know, but maybe that's a conversation for another day.
UBI - CIA Agent Explains Why Americans Will Never Get Universal Basic Income?
