Bitcoin - Secret Distribution Code Meant To Fire -Btc less wallets than Btcmyk?

Hey you, welcome back to the channel. And guys, today I want to talk a little bit about Bitcoin NYK and why I think it will end up surpassing Bitcoin in wallets. And so we're going to take a look at some of these stats, statistics that come over from the World Bank, come from dosomething.org that reports that 80% of the world population lives on less than $10 a day. And so 80% of our global market is living on less than $10 a day. Oxfam estimates that it would take $60 billion annually to end extreme global, global poverty. That's less than one-fourth the income of the top richest billionaires. So only $60 billion annually would reduce this significantly. It would end this extreme global poverty. And so in the cryptocurrency space, numbers like that we've seen move around the cryptocurrency space, no problem. And when we think about a global marketplace and this many people who would have a demand for getting more value or getting more distribution over to them and around the world, then what we get out of this is a great demand. Now, where I think there's a a big mistake that's being made with BitcoinNYK is that people tend to think, well, okay, uh, you're basically giving money, giving away money to people, um, and, uh, because you're doing that, uh, what that means is that, uh, it's some kind of, um, you know, social program, a universal basic income program. And what we do, we do have a a portion of our tokens that go to supply that. But I think it's incorrect to say that we're just that, or to kind of look at us and our value as being that. And the reason I say that is because the only tokens that fund the Universal Basic Income program are lost tokens that are excluded from the economy anyway, uh, tokens that haven't been claimed and they go back and circulate amongst, uh, the, um, the market value of our tokens. Now, the way we view that is that those tokens could at any time be sold at any particular, um, uh, place in the market at any particular time in the market. And so we don't— I wouldn't really see that as affecting, um, the value of BitcoinNYK, uh, other than any other valuable token out there. But getting back to the demand, we have to really dissect why people feel they even need to use cryptocurrency in the first place. Now, in addressing a problem like this, at the same time simultaneously conducting a cryptocurrency used as a money used to distribute value across the globe. Um, I think it's important to dissect demand, understand how you get demand, right? Uh, now I was, um, looking at a poll that talked about people in the United States specifically that over 84% of them didn't feel they needed to use crypto and had no future plans to ever use cryptocurrency. Over 84% of the American population doesn't feel they need crypto and don't ever plan to use it. Um, so that shows me that there isn't enough demand to adopt cryptocurrency as we know it, right? However, These statistics suggest to me that there is a way to mass adopt cryptocurrency. And the reason being is that in dealing with distribution in situations like this, where over 80% of our global marketplace is living on less than $10 a day, but I'm sure they have skills that are more valuable than $10 a day. In these particular situations, um, it's clear to me, and many statistics suggest this, many, a lot of research suggests this, that cryptocurrency and the blockchain is the best way to have this global distribution, right? To, that makes the economy better, makes tokens more valuable, and improves, uh, the state of our global economy. Now, for people who feel like BitcoinMYK, uh, won't have value because it's giving away these tokens, or doesn't have value because it's just another cryptocurrency, I would have to disagree with you and point you to the, the idea and the concept that the people who receive a portion of these tokens that many people say, oh, it's being given away, or it's just money being thrown away, or it's money being given to people who haven't earned it. I would try to remind, um, you all that again, many of the skills that these people have are going to be more valuable than $10 a day. Um, And, um, what Bitcoin NYK is implementing is a task workers economy, which will allow these people to be paid in Bitcoin NYK and trade those skills from east to west. Now what they've done is they've altered their value. They've moved their value from one place to another, right? And so now what that's doing is it's putting the value back that people are suggesting that it's being taken out of Bitcoin NYK. Um, so with 80% of the global marketplace in a demand this huge, I would have to move to say that Bitcoin NYK has a great chance of gaining these people as Bitcoin NYK holders, whereas Bitcoin the Bitcoin does not. And the reason Bitcoin does not have that ability, because right now and in the future to come probably as well, Bitcoin itself just simply doesn't have that demand. It probably will never have that demand. And I know Bitcoin maximalists, you know, kind of might, you know, feel a little bit upset about this comment. But looking at the statistics and looking at demand and who seeks for that demand to be remedied, it would just logically move me to go to— it makes more sense for people to adopt a Bitcoin fork that grants universal basic income that implements a way for them to trade their global skills on the marketplace, as well as BitcoinNYK solves the issues of helping people to, in a very easy way, set up a wallet to use online exchanges to redeem that value. And it's very user-friendly in that way. It resembles social media sites they've used before, and, you know, it— so that makes it the adoption process very easy for them. And it answers the demand which most of our global marketplace has at this time. Now, where— what we're doing, I think, is going to be unique and a lot more different than many other tokens that maybe attempt this, or even Bitcoin itself, is that we follow the Bitcoin ledger to the T, which means this isn't about giving people money they haven't earned. This is about giving Bitcoin holders, giving the crypto, giving everybody value, the same amount of value and the same amount of opportunity in that, in that regard. Now, of course, with a Bitcoin fork, as you hold more and more Bitcoin, we match you with your, against your Bitcoin tokens in BitcoinMYK. The only tokens again that fund the UBI program are the ones that are out of circulation. Again, either down to it just being lost out of the system, due to, you know, people never claiming or never, never planning to claim it for whatever reason. Whatever the case may be, these tokens are out of circulation. Now, interesting enough, I also want to make this point. There is a theory going around, and who knows if it's true or not, that Bitcoin itself was meant to, uh, be this well-distributed, uh, token, and that at a certain stage a code would fire in Bitcoin, um, when it reaches a certain amount of distribution of these tokens, where A lot of these unused tokens that we think aren't, that are sitting in Bitcoin that aren't being used, that we think they're just big whales holding it or something like that. There's a theory that there is a code that will trigger a secret Bitcoin code. And what this code will do is it would distribute to Bitcoin holders with less Bitcoin so that there aren't this pyramid of people controlling all of Bitcoin, that it is well distributed and kind of meets its purposes as being this way of giving money back to the people and not being controlled in this centralized fashion. Now, whether you believe that or not, you know, who knows? If you listen to people like Craig Wright, Craig Wright believes that Bitcoin was always meant to be not only this very capitalist type situation, but that it was never meant to be mined at home by individual people, that it was always meant to be done at these huge mining data centers, these huge conglomerates, which is very reminiscent of what you get in traditional institutions and systems, right? Um, and so a lot of people probably don't agree with Craig Wright, who's, uh, some believe may be Satoshi or may be part of a Satoshi-like group. But whatever the case is, uh, Bitcoin MYK is implementing a very similar system to that in a way, uh, which means that these unused tokens are being put back in the economy but they are available to everyone. Just like if that theory were correct, uh, that's how that would occur. So it's all very interesting to think about, even if it's not true. Personally, I think it's a good idea. Um, and so that's how it works. But this is why I think Bitcoin NYK will surpass Bitcoin in wallets. Uh, now this doesn't diminish the importance of Bitcoin itself. This is why We follow the Bitcoin ledger. Bitcoin is the most secure network out there. Uh, to be completely honest with you all, I know a lot of people like many other altcoins. I myself am guilty of that. I like many other altcoins, but the reality of the situation is that none of these altcoins structural-wise, infrastructure-wise, security-wise are even— can even hold a candle or even remotely close to what Bitcoin security protocol offers. And that's why we follow the Bitcoin ledger to a T. That's why we're a Bitcoin fork, uh, and that's why if you're a Bitcoin holder, you should claim your BitcoinNYK tokens. Be a part of Bitcoin. It is for you, uh, it is meant to help Bitcoin, help the entire cryptocurrency space, and help the entire world. We have a good way forward on how to do that. It is already working, uh, and I believe it will work better in a way than Bitcoin. It's faster than Bitcoin. It's going to be more distributed than Bitcoin. It's going to be more wallets than Bitcoin. If there are any security problems, it's not going to matter because it's going to follow the Bitcoin ledger to the T, meaning that anybody's holding Bitcoin at any point in time, they're going to be able to claim Bitcoin MYK tokens. As they amass more Bitcoin, they're going to be to amass more BitcoinNYK tokens. So that's why BitcoinNYK, we believe, will surpass Bitcoin and wallets. That is for sure. I, I, we don't have a doubt about that. And for people who doubt that and say that won't happen with 80% of our global marketplace in a huge demand for what we're doing, I would remind you that Bitcoin has about, on record now, only about 50 million wallets after a decade. But in addition to that, most of those wallets belong to— aren't, uh, it's not really 50 million wallets. I have about— just think about this for a minute— I have about perhaps 4 to 5 Bitcoin wallets just myself. Now think about everybody who has a Bitcoin wallet, how many Bitcoin wallets they hold. When you factor all that, you're getting a great deal less than 50 million wallets. You might be getting 20 to 30 million wallets, maybe. That is far cry, a far cry from any type of mass adoption, right? Bitcoin MYK as a Bitcoin fork can easily achieve this mass adoption. Not only that, but it can convert these, um, UBI token claimers, uh, their value into an exchangeable product and money, uh, which will be done through our Task Workers Program. And so we have a very clear, uh, plan that can be implemented, that is being implemented at this time. And so again, it's not to defuse Bitcoin or hurt it in any way. In fact, again, we say that you only need to hold Bitcoin to exchange our tokens. You don't even need to buy the token, right? So that's why I say that this is a good complement to Bitcoin and that it can be used quite well and pushing not only Bitcoin forward, but actually solving the problems with the technology we're using for the Waves platform to do this in a very effective way. But that's all I want to say about BitcoinMYK and its nature with Bitcoin, and also talk a little bit about this allegedly secret code in Bitcoin that would fire possibly at some point in time. But however, if it doesn't fire, if it is a myth, we still have a working product now, BitcoinMYK, that does a very similar thing. Thing. Guys, if you like content like this, don't forget to like, subscribe, and until next time, take care.