Xen Crypto 100% Better Than Hex! - Btcmyk 1000% Better Than Xen
In this opinionated video the host argues that XEN (also referred to as XIN) is a fundamentally better cryptocurrency than HEX. The core of the argument is XEN’s free‑minting model, which creates a strong network effect and aligns with Metcalfe’s Law, leading to higher liquidity, broader exchange support and decentralisation. The host contrasts this with HEX’s history of being labelled a scam, its reliance on a central figure (Richard Heart), high fees, and a concentration of token ownership that creates security and liquidity concerns, especially on PulseChain. The speaker also critiques PulseChain’s low liquidity and the lack of truly innovative projects beyond Heart’s ecosystem. After establishing XEN’s advantages, the video pivots to promote the creator’s own project, BitcoinMYK, claiming it surpasses both XEN and HEX. BitcoinMYK is presented as the first “proof‑of‑participation” token, deployed on multiple blockchains (Bitcoin Cash, Polygon, Hive, Waves), offering near‑free transactions, a deflationary supply, an easy‑to‑use social‑media‑driven interface, and a “Citizen’s Dividend” aimed at mitigating future job loss from automation. The host frames BitcoinMYK as a socially responsible, economically sound solution that will outlast XEN and HEX, tying its value proposition to broader societal challenges such as automation, nuclear risk, and longevity.
Chapters
Welcome back to the channel. I hope you all are having a great day. So today, guys, we're going to talk about what's going to be the trillion-dollar question, right? What it's going to all boil down to, and that is, is XEN better than HEX, or is HEX still better than XEN? These comparisons seem to be made because these projects are so similar, right, in idea. But we're going to take it up. But as you can see by the title of the video, we've already concluded that XIN is better than HEX, and we're going to get into why that is. And then we're going to talk about, but why Bitcoin MYK is better than XIN, right? So I think by the end of this video, you may or may not agree with me, but we welcome, uh, any, uh, comments, um, to get inside your understanding of, or help us understand you all as well as hopefully we all are understandable to you all. So first, let's get into why we're saying XEN is better than HEX, right? Let's talk about it. What's happened the last week or so, right, is we've seen basically XEN come on the scene. now available on several chains. I think about 5 different blockchains now doing, uh, the minting of the cryptocurrency. Well over a million mentors, um, so far, uh, probably I think about 1.5 million mentors so far, uh, um, uh, and, uh, prices have, uh, I think performed kind of ideally like what we thought they would with the 90% drop-off and so on. And that's nothing, uh, you know, out of the ordinary. Uh, HEX, uh, went through one of the most disastrous, um, situations, um, in cryptocurrency, right? The people were pretty much well assured HEX was a scam and that the price performance of HEX was agreeable with reinforcing that, right? And that went on for like years before HEX started to take off and do the returns that people know it for today, right? So people think it was just like this smooth thing where Richard Heart was just a genius and let you— oh no, if you're from the very beginning like me, probably the first crypto influencer to talk about HEX. I start talking about HEX in late 2018, so I don't think anybody can get quite near there like I, my understanding of HEX, right? And I certainly welcome a debate with them if they disagree with that. But it was a very terrible set of circumstances before HEX had its glory days, right? Everybody was calling it a scam and everybody was believing it was a scam and people thought it was dead, never to return. And that was the reality of HEX, right? It was a complete disaster, right? So, you know, how people put HEX today, that's after the fact, right? That's after everybody went through the worst of times. XEN in comparison, I think, has been much better because, simply because, XEN's whole stick is it's a free cryptocurrency, right? And mentally, once people get over the fee structure that is not put on, placed on them by XEN, you know, unlike with HEX where you actually have to buy it, right? You have to actually go buy Richard Heart's coin. Then, you know, Jack Levine doesn't get that money directly, right? So it benefits the miners and the system validators. Now a lot of people would say, oh, that's a waste of economic energy, but wait a minute. Think about that again, right? You're basically putting money in miners' pockets, validators' pockets, right? You're making a lot of friends. You're making friends with all exchanges. So guess what? They're going to want to list you. right? The Binance, as it were, right? You're gonna— you're not gonna have any problem there, which means you're gonna have a great deal of liquidity. You're gonna have the exchanges putting up money, right? They're saying the exchange is gonna be dumping, but I don't think the exchanges are gonna be dumping like they think. I think what's happened is Jack Levine has made a lot of friends, right? It's a very genius idea, and in doing that, he's building up something called network effect, right? This is a cryptocurrency that at this point in cryptocurrency is the premier cryptocurrency as far as excitement and activity and focus. Nobody's focused on anything else. They've utterly given up on pretty much every cryptocurrency, including HEX and PulseChain, right? Uh, because they don't know when it's gonna launch. They're just sitting there not really doing anything. Uh, and there are many possibilities with XIN. Right. Of course, the worst part of that being XIN functions exactly like HEX, which makes HEX replaceable to it. Now, don't get me wrong, this isn't something that I want to happen. This is just me reporting what seems to be happening. I don't think that it necessarily has to be a situation where the Hex— the Hexican community doesn't benefit from XIN. Like, for example, if the PulseChain does come out or when it comes out, Um, XEN could be probably one of the best performing assets on the PulseChain. Now, PulseChain is going to need, uh, a great performing cryptocurrency because we got to think the rest of the cryptocurrencies, right, aren't going to be performing on PulseChain, right? All these copies are just kind of like a waste of time in my opinion. People aren't going to be trading those cryptocurrencies on those other blockchains. And I can prove to you why that's true. If it was just a matter, guys, of cheaper fees, right? A cheaper fee structure, then why, why is it that the cryptocurrencies like Shiba Inu and many others didn't just go to the cheaper chains and perform as good, right? Why didn't they just go over to Matic, as it were, and go over to the countless other Binance, the countless other chains that exist that could accommodate them, right? Uh, it didn't work because those aren't the reasons why those projects aren't performing well, right? The reasons that they're performing well is because there's a cabal between Bitcoin and Ethereum where all the investor money, uh, institutional money, developer money are on those particular chains, right? And they mean to keep it that way. All right, the only thing that can break that up is a revolutionary mass adoption event that will bring many people in the cryptocurrency, uh, to a point where it doesn't necessarily have to be that they come through Bitcoin or Ethereum, right? Uh, and that's a great possibility. It all depends on how it's marketed, who market— markets it, and, uh, if it, if it catches that certain virality, right? Which I think It's just a matter of time before that happens, right? But it has to happen, uh, at the right time in the right set of circumstances, and they all have to fall like dominoes, right? Or, you know, that's not gonna happen. So PulseChain, unless it gets that one great project— and right now Richard Heart's just hoping he can do it with, uh, his coins, and then they can create you know, this very, this very, you know, low fee structure where then everybody kind of jumps into HEX or jumps on the PulseX, you know, DEX or whatever. But if we're being realistic, guys, probably what's likely to happen is that the PulseChain, if we look at the low liquidity it has now, amongst all the chains, it going off on its own, right? It could be a very low liquid market, right? It'd be a very low liquid market over there with not a lot of development teams or people going over there. So unless you have at least one project outside of Richard Heart's projects, I don't think, you know, you're gonna have the result that he's thinking. Because if that were the case, I would think HEX performing good amongst the chains would have, would have made more sense and done better with, you know, with the 100,000 stakers with their money locked up. I would think the price performance and liquidity of HEX, uh, would be greater now, uh, in this set of circumstances, not worse. So, uh, I, I think what people are saying is, well, then, um, You know, it's because the fees are too high. But come on, like, there could have been a HEX launched on MATIC that could have solved that problem if it were that simple, right? So my opinion is Richard Heart's just, you know, drumming up more money, just raising more money because he's good at it. And that's what he did with the Pulse and Pulse X sacrifices, right? Because the projects that he's created, whereas HEX was kind of revolutionary for his time when there was no competition At this point in time, uh, now there are better versions and better ideas than HEX, and, uh, HEX seems to be the only thing that's not a copy, right? Think about every other thing that's happening on PulseChain, uh, on the Richard Heart projects. They're all copies of something else, right? You, uh, PulseX is a, a, a copy of, uh, Uniswap. Um, you know, HEX is supposed to be Bitcoin. Uh, uh, was the, was the other one, and then he's, uh, hoping to do the, um, do a wallet off of his own wallet like MetaMask or something, right? And raise money for that, but it's just a wallet. So what, what I'm saying is that there aren't really any revolutionary projects in the Richard Heart sphere, right? As far as I can tell. What was so great about XIN is that it was a free cryptocurrency. Now I know people would think, hey, that's a simple concept, but it works. Right. Free works because free can create what something is called network effect, or it can create something based on Metcalfe's Law. Right. Which in Metcalfe's Law, the most activity you have with machines or people, people get upset about the bots being used, but those are still points of contact. So it really doesn't matter whether you're— whether it's machine, network, personal account. These things all make up Metcalfe's Law, and they can all create network effect, which is what you're really after, right? So in that way, uh, free— nothing can trump free, right? You're gonna always have more people in, um, over free. And what you have to understand about free, if you look at something like, uh, social networks— Instagram, Twitter, right? You get accounts with them free, right? You get to use them free. You pay nothing. You look at something like, what's the, what's the other one outside of social media? I was going for another example where you get something free and you don't have to pay anything. But yeah, Wikipedia, right? Wikipedia. Wikipedia was looking for money, right? They needed money because they were functioning as a nonprofit. Right? So what happened with— what could you say in essence that Wikipedia is worth less or valueless, right? Even back then? No, because the network of Wikipedia was so huge by default, it was of value, right? You cannot have— I've never seen in history a large network of something where there's activity with people, whether you're minting cryptocurrencies, creating bots, whatever you're doing. Where it didn't have significant value. Even when Facebook, right, uh, we didn't talk about Twitter and Facebook and all the fake accounts, right? Uh, one time they were saying something like 600 million Facebook accounts were false, right? Elon Musk didn't want to pay top dollar for Twitter because of the false accounts, right? He didn't want to do that, uh, and it's understandably so, but The point is this, uh, whether it was 600 million fake accounts and 2 billion real accounts or 500 million fake accounts and 500 million real accounts, it doesn't really matter because at the end of the day, these are still very huge influential, uh, networks that value comes to them based on Metcalfe's Law. Which means they can't have a value of zero. More likely, as the millions go up, they're going to have significant value. Doesn't matter if you— if people are able to get in free. You don't pay for social media. You don't pay for many things that you are a part of, that you are in. You don't pay for them, but they have value and they move value nonetheless. Right? So I hope that kind of clears up that idea that free means nothing, right? Now, in essence, what we're oftentimes talking about in cryptocurrency is that people who aren't real investors, whether it be in their time or money, right? They want to see these, uh, flash pumps, right? Immediately. Like they want to see these 50x's, 100x's overnight, right? And so if they don't see that immediately, they start to think that, oh, this is not, you know, working or something to that effect, right? That's generally what they do. So that's typically the problem. And generally they think something's wrong when the prices don't do that. But much like HEX and the HEX situation, those things took place over years, right? Um, and, uh, there's no reason to believe that that same thing can't happen to Zen because there's going to be nothing quite like Zen no matter what type of cryptocurrency project launches. When it comes to network effect and mass adoption, uh, there's nothing trumps free. So you're not going to be able to achieve that with any other cryptocurrency where you're taking all the risks and it's just yet another failed cryptocurrency project that's hard for people to get in, right? Or quite risky. Now, uh, I want to show you guys something because this is very important. Because as I've talked up XIN now, uh, why the reasons I believe, uh, that XIN is better than HEX, um, and then, you know, the security concerns, right? That's the next thing I want to get into. The security concerns of of HEX and, uh, the Pulse community is going to keep a lot of institutions out. It's going to keep a lot of big money people out of it, right? Uh, simply because they know that most of that 90% is in the hands of one entity in control, right? Uh, so in a situation like that, real big money is not going to want to enter it, which means you could be looking at low liquidity for a long, long time. I don't think Zen is going to have that problem because Zen's whole thing is that, you know, nobody, anybody could be minting no matter how much they try to control that network, whether it be exchanges or some entity someplace with a billion bots. No matter what happens with Zen, the ratio of community control to, to that level is going to look better than Bitcoin, Ethereum, and most cryptocurrencies out there. It's still going to look better than that, even if there's something like 60/40. Um, it's still going to look better and still be more decentralized in nature than other cryptocurrencies. I don't think people quite understand or get this. Even when you look at something like Bitcoin, 87% of the Bitcoin network is owned and controlled by only about 1%. You hear talk about entities like Grayscale, that just one entity that controls 2 to 3% of Bitcoin. So, you know, let's be for real, guys, uh, and let's really understand what we're talking about here and what we're looking about— looking at here, right? I know that some of you all have been accused of being in the Hex cult, uh, and you meet all the parameters of what it means to be in a cult, where typically a cult is defined as following one charismatic leader, right, which would be Richard Heart. And much of the HESH community falls into that camp over, uh, doing the actual research and dealing with the, the actual facts of the case in these projects. And what is that? That is very highly likely that Richard Heart controls 90% of the project, however you want to look at that and flip that. It's always going to be a security concern to a lot of people. Now that's not a problem with Zen. This makes Zen better for all, for that and many of the other reasons we spoke of as far as virality and as far as getting people in, right? There is incentive in first giving someone something free and next giving, um, uh, uh, their incentive to, as more people join, it's better for everybody, right? So the more people you get in, the more value you get right under you. So almost like a referral program that works great with every major company that's existed in history or entity or project, right? Uh, last but not least, I'm going to tell you this part, why as great as XIN can be Uh, why is it not going to be better than BitcoinMYK, our project, right? Number one, we were the first proof of participation model, and I think we psychologically understand people a little bit better. Let me tell you why. First, our user interfaces are, are a lot easier, right? So if you're looking here, this is just another, um, front end. You can come in through BitcoinMYK. It's all social media. People post social media things. They earn the cryptocurrency. They earn it based on the participation, not on tipping or something like that. Now, what's significant about being on this Bitcoin Cash blockchain version, whereas we have many, we're also on Polygon, we're on Bitcoin Cash, we're on Hive, we're on Waves, right? And we're going to be on many more in the future, but these are very user interfaces. The transactions are either free or almost free, right? Or so, so minuscule, uh, small that they're almost free. Um, so you've met all those, those conditions. It's deflationary, right? Meaning, um, it's only about 30 million coins right now. In the end, it'll only be about 5 million, right? So that means that as people cram into the network, it's gonna be hard for the value to stay down, right? Very, very hard. Very, very hard. Um, and, uh, what else, what else, what else makes it just better? Uh, um, if that's not enough for you, is giving everybody the Citizens Dividend, right? Which is one of these projects that is making the world better, right? As we move into automation, a time in our future where, um, machines are going to pretty much take every job there is, right? I think it's estimated over the next 5 or 10 years, over 49% of all jobs will be gone, right? Can you imagine how catastrophic that's going to be? If we really were to list this on a list of priorities, do you know that that would be probably the top 3 of priorities as a problem we should be looking at, right? Of course, one we should be looking at is nuclear proliferation, right? Looking at, is somebody going to get a nuke and just blow the whole— blow us to kingdom come, right? Because we're all blown up, we can't do anything else. Uh, and then right around there somewhere, people are worried about how they're going to survive after robots take all their jobs, right? We can see it happening around us now, how many jobs get automated away. Now, unless you are a complete— I don't want to insult my, my viewers, and all my viewers are smart, so this isn't for you anyway. But unless you just aren't using common sense, right, it is not hard to see that the advancement of robots, driverless cars, and so on and so forth will take more and more jobs. Our craniums are only so big, right? This is a scientific The fact that our brain is locked into our craniums, meaning that the capacity of our brains can only grow so, so big, meaning that the computers will eventually outpace us. We're not going to be smarter than them. They're not going to create more jobs that we could do better than a computer. These computers are going to reach a level close to sentience, and which, uh, some people believe they already have, but they're going to be able to perform every task a human can. Why would you need a human to do the labor, right? It is a liability to let a human do it. So point I'm making is the citizen's dividend provided through a project like Bitcoin NYK is going to trump Zencoin, it's going to trump Hexcoin. Now Richard Hart's talking about living longer. How is he going to feed these people with longevity of life, right? The longer you live, the more people on the earth The more access to resources and, uh, the ability and means to distribute money and value to the people. That's what Bitcoin NYK does. Now you get it. Now you see why it is one of the most important human, uh, uh, endeavors we need to be looking at. Anything else you're looking at, you can chuck it out the window. It's never going to match longevity of life like Richard Hart investing in SENS Foundation is never gonna match. Providing a solution for automation, people not having jobs, industrial revolutions, right? So the problem of employment and what we're going to have in the future and people being able to survive and take care of themselves are going to rest on solutions like Bitcoin MYK. That's why it's so much better than XEN, HEX, and all these other projects. That's all I want to say in this video. Until next time, as always, take care of yourselves and each other.
More from Michael
UBI - CIA Agent Explains Why Americans Will Never Get Universal Basic Income?
