A short monologue by Molly McPherson analyzing the public fallout around Prince Andrew’s continued denials of involvement with Jeffrey Epstein. McPherson contrasts an institutional, victim‑centric statement from Buckingham Palace with Andrew’s individual denials and argues that his persistent refusal to accept responsibility is worsening his reputation and leading to an effective separation from the institution.
So now I also feel that. So you have Andrew versus Buckingham Palace. Palace. So it's Buckingham Palace. It's not a statement from Prince Charles. It's a statement from the institution. So it's an institutional statement versus an individual statement. Institution v. Andrew. Also, the institution statement shows sympathy, empathy for the victim. Or. Or it's like victim centric grants. The last line. Andrew is continuing to deny any action with Epstein or anything that could imply liability. It doesn't matter if you are in the public eye or if it's personal. Anyone who deflects from responsibility, from reflect, deflects from any participation in or doing anything wrong. It never goes well. It just doesn't. It never does. And that's what's happening to him. He is digging his heels in so deep that he is creating the biggest hole that he cannot come out of. So he wants to preserve the denial, but by doing that, it's gonna kill him. It is. It's gonna just bring him right on down, which is what's happening right now. So now he has a whole identity reset. The institution separated themselves from Andrew and Andrew is on his own.
