Molly McPherson comments on the staggered public release (“dripping”) of Jeffrey Epstein’s files and her deep engagement with the released materials (emails, podcasts). She notes Epstein’s informal/poorly punctuated writing in the files, wonders how many people remained engaged with him despite his charges, and signals she will discuss implicated people and the reasons for public blowback.
I think if we have to look at a week, last week was about the Epstein files coming out and dripping, dripping, dripping. Has anyone read some of those files? I've read some of them. When you cannot follow, Jeffrey Epstein could not bother with punctuation, grammar, capital letters, couldn't even bother with it. But how many people still engaged with him, knowing what he was charged with? And then, and then I've been listening to all, all of the Jeffrey Epstein email. Like, I have been going deep into all of the podcasts and everything. And the deeper that you go, you understand, and we'll start talking about some of these people, you understand why the blowback exists.
