Three speakers debate using AI to create personalized layoff videos. One claims to generate a custom video in five minutes using OpenArt and GPT-2, calling it a "human touch." Another points out the absurdity: if AI was supposed to cut costs, why spend money on expensive AI just to fire people?
Chapters
We should send a personalized AI-generated video to every single person we're laying off.
Marcus, I've been sitting with this for a while. This is genuinely one of the hardest things I've had to do. But Marcus, I have to be honest with you because I respect you too much not to be. The delta between you and the model is no longer something I can justify to the board. Marcus Chan, effective immediately, you are being laid off. Your position has been eliminated and replaced by AI.
That was my AI.
What? The words weren't even synced to your mouth and I couldn't even understand what you were saying.
I prompted this myself, so that's actually offensive to the prompt. You're missing the point. This is a personalized way to do layoffs. I generated this video in less than 5 minutes on OpenArt. I uploaded one photo of myself to the Smart Shot. It locks my character in and I can create any AI video I want. GPT-2 acts as a director and creates the entire production plan, environment, set design, lighting, moods, and then Seedance 2.0 renders it. We're adding a human touch with AI.
I thought we were laying people off because AI was too expensive, and now we're using the AI to lay more people off? I didn't think about it that way.
