How Uber addressed "BLOCKED" and "COPING" demand

In this brief dialogue, the speakers critique early Uber valuations that estimated the company’s total addressable market (TAM) by simply equating it to the existing taxi market—what they call “coping” demand, i.e., people already using taxis despite a sub‑par experience. They argue that this approach ignored a much larger “blocked” demand: individuals who avoided travel because taxis were impractical or unavailable, especially in rural or small‑town settings where full‑time taxi services are not viable. When Uber entered these markets, it not only captured the existing taxi users but also unlocked latent travel demand, expanding the TAM beyond the traditional taxi revenue base. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between coping and blocked demand when sizing platform markets and notes the specific opportunity Uber created for rides in previously underserved rural areas.










