Going Long: How Procore’s Founder Tooey Courtemanche Built a Billon-Dollar SaaS Empire Over 23 Years

Tooey Courtemanche built Procore over 23 years into a $1.2B revenue company by starting with custom home builders at $195/month and surviving the 2008 crisis when competitors died. A $300K rescue check from investor Kevin O'Connor kept it alive through the lean years, and transient project managers who switched jobs carried the product between employers.
Questions this video answers
2002
23 years ("23 years and counting")
Full version $195/month; truncated version $95/month
$5 million (first nine years)
$300,000
Chapters
So we're all of a sudden, wait a minute, this. These businesses are surviving, so we're going to go focus on them. And then once everything came out of the great financial Crisis, like around 2011, 12 in our industry, it was really interesting. I actually found a document the other day in my archives from 2007 of all of our competitors and there were like 20 names I don't even remember. And I always, I don't know if you surf, Jason, but if you duck dive under a wave on a surfboard, go underwater, you come up the other side. I always think of that as the great financial crisis because when we duck dove that way with 30 other surfers, we're the only ones who came up the other side. Everybody did.
It was extinction level event in the category.
Yeah, it was an extinction level event, which gave us this huge advantage too, of buying us more time to capture the market share.
Everyone's saster, watching, listening, running with your podcast, however you're going to consume this content. We have one of the great SaaS founders who I'm excited, tried to get them to SaaS Renewal in person before. Things have changed. But we've got Tui Courtermansh, who is the CEO and founder of Procore, the leading SaaS for construction management. We'll dig into what that means in a minute, but it's great if there's probably there's two or three great vertical SaaS players we can talk about and Procore might be one of the ones that folks know the least about, although you should know a lot more about, especially because we've got a founder CEO has been running it for a few years. How I want to. How long have you been doing it, Julie?
23 years and counting.
So, yeah.
Yeah, quite some time.
So I want to talk next about a little bit about the past and mostly about the future, but how it's the platforms evolved but you don't look tired. How have you done this for 23 years?
I've done a pretty good job of keeping the drama and the concerns and the chaos of the business out of my personal life. And I think that was really critical. And my wife has been very good about this for the last 23 years. When I get home from work at night, I am not the CEO of Procore. I am Tuohy, the husband who, you know, we talk about everything other than Procore. So it's been a. I've been trying to balance this for a long balance.
Yeah.
But of course she falls asleep and then all I do is Procore until. Until I can't keep my eyes open any longer. So I. I fake it a lot when I'm at home, too.
So it never turned for a great founder. It never turned. Your brain never turns off, even after 23 years? It never turns off. No.
It always gets me wondering, Jason, like, someday when they put me out to pasture, like, what am I gonna do? Because I think pretty much everything I think about has to do with some permutation to procore. So. Yeah. Yeah, you're gonna have to get a hobby or something.
I wanted to get some quantitative data. My rough sense from the folks that I've interacted with over the years that have gone big and then moved on is 40 to 50% somehow are happy. They're fishing. They're often. A lot of folks go into clean tech and other areas because they think that's more rewarding than business software. I used to think that. I don't anymore. And maybe half are unsettled. They're unsettled. But no. And then I want to talk more, but no. Not even a moment of honest. Of doing it for 30 years. Right. If you. If you're doing it for 30 years or more.
Right.
Yeah.
It's just who I am. So it's just.
Yeah. Yeah. I don't think in the earlier days, maybe when procore started, I don't think we could imagine folks would be running a standalone software company for 30 years doing billions of revenue. There were examples, but it seemed crazy to think about three decades, didn't it?
Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. If I had known I was going to be running this long, I don't know. I don't know what decisions I would have made differently. But.
Yeah.
And actually, people come up to me a lot that are like, I can't believe you're still running procore. When are they going to bring in the professionals? And I'm like, I don't know. I guess it's up to the board.
I don't know. We. I actually. And there's exceptions. I did this. This analysis a little while ago, that of the SaaS companies that IPO, 90% have a founder, CEO. And so I just. I don't know. My one bias out there, my one where I'm just is thinking anyone could do better than a founder, CEO. That's all in. It's just so much we underestimate. They know so much.
I. I will say this to all of the founders out there, too, which is you really want to make sure that you, as much as you want to be the face of the business. You don't want to be the. You don't want to be the totality of the business. And that's why you can't scale to a billion dollars in revenue without having an amazing team under you that are doing just phenomenal work. But some founders conflate themselves as being the business and Procore has gotten so much bigger than me over the years.
That.
I'm just the conductor.
So I want to dig in on some details. But just give us a landscape of talk about maybe Procore five years in, six years in as a platform, like how much you were able to what it, who your ICP was, what your sweet spot and compare how much that's evolved. Now you've got like a $5 million customer I think that you talked about. How has that evolved today as a platform? Not day one, but maybe X years in.
Yes. When Procore started we were a. By the way, for those of you who don't know, Procore is a construction management software platform. But when we started we were a single code based multi tenant. And this is 2002. This is before the word SaaS even came out. You couldn't even had your podcast back then because there was no such word.
I misspelled it the first time I wrote it around 2002, I. I wrote SES.
That's actually a really funny, funny anecdote. I like that. So yeah, so at the time we got lucky that we actually started off as a single code based multi platform architecture. But we were primarily serving the residential custom home builder in high net worth areas. So think like Aspen, San Diego, Santa.
Barbara where we are seven figure homes or commercial back.
Yeah, and in fact mostly on the west side of la. So like Eddie Murphy's house and Barbra Streisand's house and well, Ben Stiller's house and these folks that are high net work that are building these kind of mega mansions. And so what we found was, is that you had the combination of a, of an owner who was probably on the road, who was absent. You had. So you had a distributed team, you had complexity because most of these homes are built like commercial buildings. And so you needed a solution like Pro4. So anyway, in the beginning we were very narrowly focused and so that was our ideal customer profile was a custom home builder serving high net worth individuals.
And what could they pay you back then? What were they paying?
This project we had two versions of our product. We had a full version for $195 a month and a truncated version for $95 a month. And then the business model made no sense at all.
And there were enough Eddie Murphy homes to. To get you there at $195 a month.
We weren't making a lot of money, but we also were very capital efficient. Right. So we, I think in the first nine years of Procore's existence, we raised $5 million.
Right.
We were always very cognizant of being capital efficient.
But yeah.
It was not anything that was like gonna. We were not gonna change the world by any way, shape or form. But what it did do was it allowed us to really focus on the needs of one particular customer profile that turned out to really matter, which is the project manager. So if you zoom out in the construction world, if you're a project manager on a Eddie Murphy's house or a nuclear power plant or a, whatever, a waste treatment plant or a wind farm, you basically are dealing with the same set of problems. They just are different scales and they might have different terminology. So what we have that, that allowed us to, over the years, so like year five, like you mentioned, to start thinking about how do we become a multi product, multi stakeholder, multi geo company. But honestly, we didn't even start doing that until 2016 or 17. So we were like 14, 15 years into it before we even started embarking on all of that. And by the way, that's one of the advantages that we had, Jason, was things. First of all, it was an industry nobody cared about. So we had this. We were one of very few that were in there. And things evolved so slowly that it gave us time to really nail the solutions that we were bringing to market. The iPhone came out in 2007. IPad came out in 2011. We'd already been in business for five and seven years at that point before the real catalyst came that drove. Drove the demand for what we did. So privileged by moving in a slow tan, that was, that was huge, lots of opportunities for us.
And so 10, 12 years in, you're still really an SMB solution. Primarily.
It sounds like pretty much. By the way, during the great financial crisis, which is when everything changed to Procore, was all of our custom home builders went out of business. Like literally every customer we had in.
The world stopped for eight months. It literally stopped.
Yeah, it was tough.
It was tough.
But the only customers that maintained that were, that were stayed around with us were folks that did both residential and commercial. So mostly mixed multi use.
So you moved over facilities.
So we're all of a sudden, wait a minute, these businesses are surviving so we're going to go focus on them. And then once everything came out of the great financial Crisis, like around 2011, 12 in our industry, it was really interesting. I actually found a document the other day in my archives from 2007 of all of our competitors and there was like 20 names I don't even remember. And I always. I don't know if you surf, Jason, but if you duck dive under a wave on a surfboard and you go underwater, you come up the other side. I always think of that as the great financial crisis because when we duck dove that wave with 30 other surfers, we're the only ones who came up the other side. Everybody did.
It was extinction level event in the category.
Yeah, it was an extinction level event, which gave us this huge advantage too of buying us more time to. To capture the market share.
It's funny updating myself, but I remember I've written that time up and now it's getting to be a while ago. Yeah. But actually for. Because I had all the data from Adobe Sign, Echo Sign and our peers and all that really happened to us and this program is so different. All that really happened to us is our churn went up. But actually this is really interesting. Even in 08 and 09, our gross growth was there. But like the S and P churn was like. Because everyone thought the world was over. But for Procore, man, you must have two years where it was awful. Like literally awful.
I. Steve's on my co founder and I, we went for two years without taking a salary. I sold everything I own. My wife, thank goodness, didn't divorce me. And, and, but, and I will tell you this, if we didn't have a. An amazing investor, Kevin O', Connor, who was the founder of DoubleClick, the Internet.
Oh yeah. He knew he could go long. Yeah.
And so he basically wrote us a check for 300,000 bucks and basically to keep us alive. And that check alone saved Procore and. Wow. Yeah. In fact, he's been on our board for 20 years. He's an amazing individual.
It's funny, I look back at that time and just as a case that I'm like, things weren't as bad as they seemed, but I wasn't. But I wasn't selling to an impacted industry. I just. Disaster. I remember, I think December 2008, I didn't want to spend. The problem is no one wanted to spend any money. It was like massive deflation. And so we. I took all the points I had saved up and flew to Hawaii and stayed at The St. Regis on Kauai. And everything was points, including food. And we. I went to the front desk, I'm like, can I pay for the buffet with points or like no one's ever asked.
I'm like, our.
Our global currency has ended, so I'd love to pay for points. Yeah, for 8 million points, you could pay for the buffet. And we went. I went out to the St. Regis in December 2008. We were the only people there. Wow. I went to the bartender, right? And I'm like, where is everybody's? I mean, it was. The people just stopped spending money. They're certainly not going to buy a $5 million custom home in Beverly Hills, are they?
No. And by the way, try raising capital in a market where the real estate is the poster child for the collapse of the economy. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So I should know. So 2018, you start to go. So two, like the GFC brings you into the commercial side from residential, and then. But you're 14 years in before you really go big. I'm all in on what we would call enterprise. And what was that? Accelerant?
What was that?
What created that big change?
So we were being pulled into bigger and bigger companies. So the interesting thing about construction is very transient. So project manager, one company goes to work at another one. They bring Procore with them. And so we were getting pulled into bigger and bigger customers and we decided we were going to focus on one particular market. So we chose the Boston metropolitan market, which actually had some of the largest contractors there. And so we, myself and one of our salespeople, we just went knocking on doors and we finally found somebody who would let us in. And. And we basically were able to show them the value, what we were able to provide. We clearly were not enterprise grade at the time. They knew that, but they basically worked with us. And then the thing about the construction industry is because it's so hyperlocal, if you think about it, if you're a construction company and you have a DA bulldozer, you're not going to work 400 miles away because how are you going to get that 25 ton equipment over there? Because it's so local, every there's a FOMO factor there. So the minute we got one, everyone else wanted to take a meeting with us. And so we just leveraged that to get into all of the other ones. And we would get a pilot project and, man, they would rake us over the coals and they would put us up in front of these committees of 50 people that were like judging Our software. And we, we opened up a whole enterprise market that way.
And you brute forced it almost. You almost brute forced it then.
Yeah. But the reason we were successful was because we, we just made it about the customer. The whole time it was about the customer. They felt as if they were our. Their development shop, the product organization for Procore.
That transient nature of the project manager where a real estate project will wind up and they'll go to another potential customer and bring you in. That is the secret sauce. Right. Word of mouth is the secret sauce, I think of all software growth. But I feel like today we're putting so much pressure on renewal, so much pressure on customers not to leave, so much drama. We're almost doing the opposite. Are there things that you did to specially incent that to create some sort of. It's probably not financial, but to create any sort of community, any sort of positive loop so that when they went to the next gig, they'd be even more excited to bring Procore in.
Yeah. So one of the things that. Because the incumbent software for our entire history, whenever we go into an account has always been pen and paper or really Microsoft Office. So what happens is when somebody adopts Procore, there's some pride that they're bringing a technology platform into a underdeveloped company.
Right.
And people feel as if they're in the Procore club.
Right.
And we make them feel that way. We bring them to. They go to Groundbreak, our annual user conference, and they feel like they're on the inside of something that's special and, and that really goes a long way to building that, that, that loyalty and trust with, with those folks. And our best salespeople always had been our customers. They're out there constantly. And also the customers that recognize that if Procore is successful, they're de. Risking their investment in Procore. So they're not. They want our success is actually going to lead to their success. And that's worked really well for us.
Yeah. When people. Sometimes folks don't realize when you're doing a big process change like Prokor is, it might be someone's only app they deploy for a couple of years and do it right they're a hero do it right, they're a hero right do it wrong their one big initiative is a miss. Right.
It's so funny. Back in the 2016, 17 and 18 timeframe, we walked into a firm, they wouldn't have an IT department. The last software that they bought, their ERP solution, it was like 15 years ago. They didn't know how to buy software. And so we had to teach them how to buy software and then have them buy, buy software. Now it's a completely different world today.
Like they're.
It's. The industry is really misunderstood. It is a highly complex industry that is very data intensive and people think of construction as guys sitting on the I beam whistling at people walking by. That is not the construction industry. Construction industry is extremely complicated with these complex workflows and lots of liability and low margins and lots of stakeholders.
Right? You have a lot of stakeholders. I think I was reading your analyst day or your. It's 10 stakeholders per deal, wasn't it?
Yeah. So there's so. Well, if you think about it this way, an average construction project, a commercial project, probably had 30 trades on it. And all of those folks, so you have an owner, you have gcs, you have the subcontractors and some other folks. All of those folks are people that we sell to. There's an opportunity for us to be selling to all of these folks we call the triple tam because on one project we can have three different cohorts of stakeholders that are customers. Which is really good for Procore because of the nature of construction is very collaborative and all teams. All of these stakeholders, they work for different companies, but they all share the same workflows. And so to be able to tie all that together and to de risk it for everybody is really advantageous.
Do you have any in any of the functional areas, do you have any pods that service the different stakeholders or is it the same teams or how do you get smart with each of those different groups?
So we do.
We.
Several years ago, we basically changed our go to market motion to be very focused on and a hyperscaler. Building a data center is really different than a subcontractor that is, you know, operating tobacco. So we had to make sure the very people that could talk the talk. The good news was, is that we. One of our secrets was we would. Because the industry's so big and we have millions of users on our platform, we were able to pull the best users into the organization. And then when you go into a sales opportunity and you bring with you a sales engineer who's actually an ex project manager from the field. And as much as our sales reps can represent Procore really well, the moment that the sales engineer who's hey, I used to sit in your job in your chair and I used to do Procore and I used it this way and it saved me that all of a sudden the game changed. For us is that bringing in the resident experts into the deal really made a big difference.
Yeah, I wanted to ask about that. Wyatt, your chief product officer came to annual last year and I forget what he said his background was. He might have been a carpenter too or something like that. He was straight out of the industry, wasn't he?
His dad was a, he was a contractor in, in Colorado. So he worked for him for years. But why is the fame is he's a dj? He's, he traveled the world as like a very famous DJs or we. Yeah, he's got an interesting background.
So let's just spend a minute, then we can move on. But the domain expertise topic for vertical SaaS in general is a nuanced one. And so to go enterprise, you're actually going out, you're doing the sales with your sales lead. Right. You're going in the office convincing them that super domain experts, you're bringing in SEs and solution experts. Now how does that, what have you learned and how has it changed over time? Is Procore a big enough brand now? You can get away with hiring some kids out of college and then not really understanding what construction software is?
Not really. It, it actually has nothing to do with the scale. It's just the complexity of the problem space that we're solving for.
Yeah.
What's really interesting is, and if I was a, if I was one of your listeners and I was building a business brand is one of those things that is highly misunderstood by founders. But our brand in the United States is ubiquitous in construction. Everybody knows Procore. We, we specifically are the, are the market leader. But when we enter into a new market, like when we go into uk, Ireland, we go into the UAE or whatever, you have to remember and as a founder, you cannot forget that no one has a clue who you are. Right. So you or the life of the party and then you go to another party and no one knows who you are. You got to remember that the playbook is completely different for entering new markets because you really do have to build your brand intentionally. And in the vertical market like Procore is, you have one chance to make a good impression with your brand. And if you make a bad impression, you're essentially doomed in that market. So we are very intentional about how we go to market in new geos. And what's really interesting is that, so we sell into 11 markets today in particular, but we actually have people using Procore in 160 countries. So because of the fact that this SaaS solution. So what we're doing is we're building brand in all of these different areas because building stakeholders that are really. They love Procore. So by the time we actually go to market in one of these new areas, we have a foundation, a brand. But we. But building brand has to be very intentional. Takes a lot of boots on the ground and there's no shortcuts.
But. So when you go into these deals today, you have a big brand, but it's only in the US and it's only. It's. It has its limits. As your point, you're bringing in. It's okay to have a sales rep that has come out of Salesforce or B2B environment because you've got the SE that is the industry expert and does the salesperson. Because these are sophisticated problems with sophisticated workflows. I don't want to talk to a sales rep that knows nothing other than price, do I? What value does the sales rep add at Procore if in these sophisticated conversations?
So we spend a considerable amount of time enabling our sellers as to how to understand not only the technology but the problem space that we're solving for. I actually just went through our. Our new enablement boot camp. I'm like, if I'm gonna do anybody else, do it well. By the way, lots of pressure on the founder because everyone saw it. I got. I nailed it. But I was very. I was a little nervous on that front. But the thing that we find interesting in our world is we definitely could bring people. Sellers in who've sold elsewhere because we really do think that selling is the skill that's needed in order to build the foundation of how we're. We've tried bringing in people from the industry and teach them how to be sellers. It doesn't work that well.
Even in the early days. Didn't work well.
It worked well enough. We probably couldn't have done better. Yeah. By the way, you have to bring the right seller profile into the right account. Like we used to hire. We would occasionally hire people from one of the big tech companies and put them into a small opportunity. And they would railroad the conversation. And the prospect would be like, get out of my office. I don't. This. I don't buy. I don't. I don't want to be bullied by you, Mr. Name. That big name.
Yep.
Sales rep. So there's a lot of nuances to all of this, but we do find you got to hire salespeople that understand sales and teach them construction. The thing that I tell all of our new hires is that as, as insecure as you are walking into your first meeting with the prospect, you have to remember from their vantage point, they're insecure because they don't understand technology. So it's not going to be a one sided conversation. You're going to bring the expertise around the solution space that we provide for and the products that we deliver and they're going to be experts around their problem space and how they can use our technology. It demystifies the whole thing, but it takes a lot of effort. One of the things I wish we had done better earlier is to really invest and enable. It became a cottage industry in this business where people grew their own knowledge base based on their experiences and all, which is great, but we didn't have a standardized process until several years ago and I wish we had done that earlier.
Much earlier probably.
Right?
Much earlier. Yeah. I see too many, I see too many folks in specialized spaces thinking that they can shoot from the hip because they came out of selling sales tools. If you're a sales rep and you sold sales tools, you have a sense what the buyers. I want the irr and it's just I do believe the best in sales can sell anything, but I'm not sure the mid pack in sales can sell anything without training. I think they need a lot of help. Right? Yeah.
And I think the problem was is that our best sellers were. Had been grown up in the business. They really understood the space. So we bring on somebody else expecting that they would just do it and that would not work. So yes, it requires some thought and, and investment.
Can we talk about a topic that's super interesting to me? When you're, when you are a vertical like procore, which is market share. Yeah, you called out. It was pretty fun. I don't know a lot of public companies do this. It was fun. You called out, I think in your analyst or whatever presentation, your win rates versus your top three competitors. You said you had 63% win rate and then 86% into Greenfield. I want to unpack that, but at a meta level. Took me a little while to have a to. To be smart here. How much market share do you think you can get if you really own a whole vertical like Pro? You've got like 10 products. Right. You're automating 10 stakeholders up and down the stack in terms of functionality. Right. From invoicing to management to everything. You are the ERP for the industry. Right. Can you get 80%, 90%? What should the goal? What are you quietly telling the team behind you? Should can you get 100% market share versus Mark Benioff for years has been claiming he has 18% market share. Right?
Yeah. So our industry is really unique. And by the way, one of the biggest things when we're raising capital back in the early days was everyone was very concerned about tam. And I'm like, look, the back then it was like the global construction TAM was 11 to 15 trillion. So let's say it's 13 trillion. Look, we believe the vertical software is a winner take most opportunity.
Yeah.
This is such a big vertical that it's almost an irrelevant conversation. Right. So if I was serving a vertical that had a very limited tam, I would be talking a lot about is it a winner take most and how much, what percentage can we get? Procore doesn't need to get to 80% in order to be the most successful company on the planet. Right. We have visions and goals to get there, but for us it always comes back to the customer. And I think one of the reasons when you ask like how do I sustain this Is because every day for me is centered on our customers. If you just focus on your customers, you will get the market share that you deserve. But don't focus on the market share to try to get the customers, if that makes sense. It's. And so we've always focused on the customers. And then we wake up and we look around, we're like, oh, we have a certain percentage of the market but we don't conflate it the other way.
That's helpful. If your TAM is mega, right? You were criticized at first, but now you're accessing so much value. Your TAM is mega. Right. You're tapping into trillions. You don't have to sweat it as much. Right. I asked Andrew Bielecki from of Klaviyo of this. I don't know if Klaviyo, he's one of the best. And they're at a billion growing 30 or 40%. But they have 80% market share on the Shopify ecosystem and that's big. But you got a Shopify ecosystem is big as it is. It's not as big as all of mobile construction. So I asked him this question. It's like, why shouldn't you get all of it? But as big as that's. That is like a mid high tam. But if you really think of that multi trillion, it. It's so big. That's not your issue, is it?
Yeah, actually our issue is focus. Right. It's if you're, if you have a narrow tam, you Basically know what to do. And with us, because there's so many different types of owners out there, so many different types of GCs and so many different types of subs and projects and GEOs in international regulations and everything else, the question for us is always, where do you put your next dollar to work? And that's really my job as the CEO is capital allocation. And how do we actually. How do we actually do that in a disciplined, strategic, focused way? That's the hard part. It's not being limited by a TAM.
It's funny. So Procore is over 1.2 billion in arrangement. I don't know what your gross margins are, but let's call them 80 roughly. So you've got a billion to play with a year. That's your job. But yet it goes so quickly. It goes so cool. Yeah.
It is always funny how no matter how much revenue you make, you're always constrained.
Yeah, yeah.
And I think about the amount that we put into our product each year is. It's just hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars into R and D. Hundreds of millions.
Yeah.
And I just. You think about back in the day when we had million to put into R and D, maybe, but the amount that we actually got done, it's all. Yeah, it's everything. That's the one thing I always tell people that I mentor as founders. I'm like, it never gets any easier. It just gets different.
It's funny, on the 300 engineers or 300 million versus one, I've noticed that no matter how big you get, every release has three to four Lighthouse features. One genius. Like when we were at a mill, we had a million. We could do three, four Lighthouse features a quarter. Now granted, they weren't enterprise grade, they didn't do much and today it's three to four per quarter.
But your point is that. Yes. When you get to scale, enterprise grade adds so much complexity.
So much.
Yeah, it's. Yeah, it's. I have so much respect for the engineers at procore and the product people at Procore that do all that work. It's. By the way, I've re engaged my, my programming chops over the last like couple of months. I've been just writing stuff in Python like crazy, just trying to.
That's why you put, you went Deepsea local, you put it, you saw it locally on your laptop, right? Yep, yep.
Yeah, yeah. So I like to write just a bunch of programs that, that leverage the LLMs, but also look at Procore data and then try to make sense out of the data in our system.
So when was the last time you coded before that?
I probably took almost a decade off.
Yeah.
Yeah, I was busy running Procore and frankly by. It's not my. It's not my best skill. So I wasn't really. There was no demand for it. This is more fun for me. Like I just realized I really enjoy programming.
Yeah, I think it's. I really think it's obviously more important for a CTO, but man, if the CEO's still a little bit of a hacker, that's a good sign.
Yeah, I get this is what I.
From the best VP of N CTO I ever worked with, the best one I ever worked with, my first startup, we got acquired for a billion and the company that bought us made him their VP of Eng. Like they picked him out of the target. And what I learned for him is don't hire anyone where the first line in their bio, whatever, wherever it is, isn't hacker. He said, I don't care how deep they are in there. And I found this like every time I interview engineering leaders and it's strategy or no hacker, I want to see someone that's always hacker.
Isn't that the whole thing with the deep seat company was that founder only will hire people with no experience.
Right.
Because he doesn't want them to bring in their predisposed biases. And I think something really interesting to be said for that.
All right, so maybe let's wrap on AI just for fun. But before we get there, a very tactical topic where I think we're all. We've all learned a lot the last couple years is strategy and timing and going multi product. Right. And I think I read again your average customer now uses three to four products. Right. And the bigger ones are like five to six meta learnings to go earlier there. Did you sequence it properly? Would you do a different. Because I find you have to almost move faster today than when you had one, a handful of competitors that died in the great financial crisis. So what have you learned on how quickly and deep to go here in vertical SaaS?
My experience is probably going to be irrelevant to the new founders out there because we. To your point, we had so much time to figure this out because the industry was moving slow in adoption and there wasn't a lot of technology. I was thinking about this the other day. If I'm a founder today, and especially if I'm doing something in AI, a 24 hour news cycle can change my entire business. Right. It can take it from like a huge opportunity to being completely worthless or vice versa, I didn't have to deal with that. So just to set the stage like I had time to get the multi product and the pricing and packaging stuff done in a way that works. And again it always comes back to we just met our customers with where they were and we never built a product that our customers didn't ask us to build and the preponderance customers didn't ask us to build. It was always very clear as to when you're serving an industry that is completely non digitized, completely analog.
Yeah.
The first, second, third, fourth and fifth problem are all very obvious because it's like a, it's like an, it's like a layer of an onion. Right. There are certain things in project management that you just have to get right before you do. Like drones or something. Like you got to get the fundamentals right. For us it was always very clear.
Yeah.
And then I will tell you that the moving from a single product company to a multi product company was one of the hardest transitions we had to make. You talk about capital allocation challenges. Now you have to figure out like where am I going to put my next dollar to work? Is there something accretive across both. It gets much more difficult but if you listen to your customers you probably will get it right.
I find Today the vertical SaaS companies that I'm closest with, whether it's in restaurants or salon software others, they're all multi product by 10 million or earlier. They all have the suite, they all have workflow and marketing and payroll and invoicing and skit like you've got like the customers just aren't, are too demanding today. They don't want, they don't want a little piece anymore. It's got. Why Procore has it all. Toast has it all. I'm not going to buy one little. Like why would I buy one little piece?
That's. Yeah. The era of point solutions is over. I could, we could do a whole podcast on the evolution of software adoption in by industry.
But yes, it's a good we. It was a different era because we just had more. It was. Markets were smaller but we had more. You could do things sequentially. You could listen to customers for a year and then plan that out. And today the rate of change is.
So high right in, in our world too. People used to download apps and job site trailers like a punch list app or a document app or a photo app. But what's happened to the industry and this is going to tee you up for the AI conversation happened to the industry is that construction is so data intensive that having siloed single point point solutions is not going to help you. What you really need is a corpus of data. Not only your own corpus of data but you need the corpus of data of an entire ecosystem to basically make sense out of. And that's why our business I think is so prime for future success is that we have all the construction data you could ever want. We can help people build better because the patterns are very obvious and it's a complex thing. And right now the industry relies on people that are very, they have a lot of experience in pattern recognition but they're non scalable. Right. And they tend to be in their career. And so we believe that leveraging all this knowledge that's in our platform is really going to change the way people build.
Yes. Let's wrap on AI. I find that when I talk to folks that are in very niches, verticals, they're all fascinated. Right. But they don't necessarily seem see the same customer poll that you do in deep tech. And I see a more measured approach. And now this may have changed. Just in the last week we're talking about Deep Seq which right or wrong opened our eyes to hey, maybe we could do 10 times as much as we could do last week. What? Tell us what, what you're thinking, what you're working on and how do the customers think about it? Are they begging you for more AI? Do they want more automation, more workflows? Do they want some part of Procore just to be easier to use because it's 2025, like how are you thinking? But also how are the customer, what are the customers asking for?
All of what you just said. But by the way, it does start with ease of use. So forget about AI for a second. People need tools that they can actually use. So we invest a lot in our UX kind of investment front. But when it comes to data, what people are asking for is first and foremost our customers tell us that they can run 50% more construction volume on through their business if they're running on the procore platform than if they're not. And why that matters is in the construction industry it's a very low margin business, like 2 to 3% gross margin business. So your talking about 80%. Like imagine running that business like a grocery store. It's very difficult, low margin. And so every, every time you can avoid hiring the next person. Especially in a constrained market like construction, there's not enough people to do the work. You actually have A competitive advantage. So first and foremost, they want to be to increase the productivity of their workforce by leveraging technology. But that's usually starts with just managing workflows and capturing data and stuff like that, which is fine. But what the industry is waking up to realize is that, wait a minute, a lot of money is lost in construction because mistakes are made that shouldn't have been made because somebody didn't have the pattern recognition that they need. So now that they want to leverage the data that's in the platform, not just their data, but the anonymized data of the world, to be able to make these more informed decisions. And now with agents, what they're asking for is they want to take the repetitive work out of their people's hands and put it into the hands of agents so that the people can get outside of the job site trailer, away from the computer, and get back to building. And that does two things that makes the companies more efficient, and it also attracts more people into the industry because instead of being paper pushers, pencil people, they're actually out building and doing what they want to do. So it's an exciting time.
And is there even a lot of cases when you talk to real customers, one of the reasons they want the AI is they just can't hire anybody to do a lot of this basic work. They can't hire anyone to do the data entry or the input or to sit in the trailer. There's just the turnover is so high. Right. That people don't even exist. The human.
Jason, I should tell you this. This is that our industry, the construction industry, is probably the most chronically understaffed industry on the planet. People just don't want to get into construction. There's a stigma to it, which I really can't stand.
But.
But the reality is there's just not enough people to do the work. So it's not even people are leaving. It's just they're not even there. So, yeah, you. It's a necessity, because here's the thing, like, data centers is a big business right now, obviously, right. Microsoft's going to spend $80 billion on data centers. A lot of our customers are general contractors. As much as they want to spin up a data center business, they don't have. They can't find people to do the work because there's just not enough people on the planet that actually know how to build a data center using, you know, products like Procore, allow them to do more with less, which is really cool.
All right, last question, then. We'll Wrap. So you're getting back into Python. You playing with deep seq. What did you have any epiphany? Did you think, God, if maybe in a year I could do this with Procore, I could just do something in the industry. Any AI. I don't mean to put you on the spot, but any. We're all seeing so much change. Any. Anything you all. Any aha moments you had out of all of this.
You know what I like? Yes. The aha moment is that we're all limited by our ability to prompt engineer. So I think as we get better at prompt engineering, we're going to be able to ask these models much more sophisticated questions. And now that you actually get chain of thought, you can actually ask really deep questions and really deep. And ask for really deep analysis, which is completely different than just predicting the next word that's going to come up for me. Now that you have these models that are reasoning models that can do this chain of thought, I think that everything is going to change. I think the way that I actually think the way construction gets delivered is going to change because a lot of processes in construction are built around trying to do risk mitigation because people know that mistakes are going to happen. If you can prevent those mistakes from happening, you can actually reduce all the risk mitigation and actually increase people's profits. So I think, yeah, I just think there's a lot that's coming and it could not be a more exciting time to be essentially a data company in a industry that's as big as construction is.
When you talk about doing tasks that we don't have humans to do, when you talk about removing errors from mega projects, does AI over the next couple years, does it unlock more budget from the customers, more true Tamil? Or is it a push? Like the customers just deserve this stuff, Right? I'm not going to pay $2 for every resolution or $2 for every. Is it a push? Is it more budget? Do you have a gut where we stand today?
There's two questions in there. One is like, how do we think about monetizing this? And the other question is where? Because what I would say is for now, we're not looking to create a product line around this that's going to be separately monetized. Now that's always open for debate. We really want to get more feedback from our customers before we make any sort of decision on that. But I believe that our industry in particular, once they see the power of AI on their data unlocking opportunities for them to have Higher margin business and whatever else that to me is going to unlock more budget to be able to do more with technology in general. And they may end up buying more products of ours because we have more insights that we can deliver or whatever. But. So I think they're somewhat distinct. But. But yeah, I think. I think every industry is going to start realizing that a dollar invested in some form of AI to deliver significant returns is it. You just have to make sure that dollar goes in the right place.
Yeah. We can wrap on that. That's what I love. Which is that we're getting back to our roots where it's a service like we're providing 10x value. Yeah. We're not trying to rip customers off. Not the Procore does, but other vendors. We're not trying to. We're growing 8%. So we've got to. We've got to get everything out of our base because we've lost net new logos. There's a lot of that going around today. And we're not about providing 10x value. Right. I think I can get us back to our roots where 199 bucks in the old days of Procore or whether it's 1.9 million today I want to provide 19 million of value or 190 million of value. Like that's how you get a customer for life, isn't it? Yeah.
And I'll tell you that's why I really appreciate competition, which is it keeps us on our toes. We have to earn our customers business generally every year. Right. So we couldn't be in that business of ripping people off. We have to deliver more value than they're paying for significantly in order to keep these customers. So it keeps us focused on all the right stuff and. Yeah. And I think that's one of the reasons Procore has been successful is that we've forced ourselves to just be so customer centric.
Cool.
All right.
This was great too. Is there anything we missed that you can think of?
And I know I appreciate you and I always enjoy getting a chance to talk to you. Jason. All right.
This is great.










