Lessons Redefining a Really Big Category with Coupa's CEO Rob Bernshteyn

Rob Bernshteyn, CEO of Coupa, discusses how the company uses community intelligence from $300B in aggregated spend data to give customers prescriptive recommendations. With 600 customers and 95% renewal rates, Coupa focuses on measurable success and disciplined growth rather than competing directly with giants like SAP and Oracle.
Chapters
Please welcome Rob Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer and Koopa value orchestrator of Koopa Software. And Jason Lemkin, founder of Saster. Did everyone get lunch? Rob, thanks for joining us. This is great. I want to welcome Rob Bernstein from Coupa. And I actually hadn't met Rob until today, but I was a fan of the company on a bunch of levels and I learned a little bit about procurement and buy side stuff back when I ran my last startup and it was a space with fewer vendors. That was huge and very interesting. And then when I became briefly an SVP in a Fortune 500 company, I had to use these products like Ariba and Concur and I would just bang my head across the table and I kind of watched the Coupa story in general. I was fascinated. And then I wrote a post about a year ago and Coupa IPO'd, what, maybe 13 months ago about that. Okay. And then Koopa and Twilio both IPO'd around the same time. Very different companies, but the growth rates were kind of jaw dropping. And I think you were growing 70%, something like that, when you IPO'd. You might not remember, but it was pretty good. Right. So there's a lot of things I wanted to talk about, about how old categories turn over, why companies are growing more. And let's dig into that. But first because we were chatting a little bit backstage. Tell us even before we talk about Koopa. Well, first tell us about Koopa and then I want to go a little bit about time about how you got into enterprise software. Right. So tell us how many employees, how many customers and what you're doing today.
In the space, roughly 600 or so customers. We've got nearly a thousand employees around the world and we attacked a very interesting market opportunity. You know, I had a chance to walk around here over the last hour or so and I see a lot of companies that are focused on revenue generation and pushing market share and helping companies sell more, capture more revenue.
So many sell side vendors, right? Thousands, right?
Yes. And in my mind for the last couple of decades, I've been thinking about information technology and how you could apply that to helping companies actually spend more effectively, more efficiently, better price points with the right suppliers. It just seemed to me that when information becoming more and more readily available, you're able to understand whom you could be purchasing from. Companies really could do a much better job in terms of managing their own internal operations, getting the best price points, working with the best suppliers over time. So we wanted to build something that helped them with that and, you know, we're on our way.
Got it. And when was the company founded?
Well, roughly a decade ago.
Decade ago. And what was. So the competition today is still big guys, right? Is the biggest competition in deals today still Ariba, SAP, Oracle? Is that the big guys that you can be with today in 2018?
You know, I'll tell you, I honestly believe the ultimate competition we have at our company is ourselves. It's not so much the large enterprise software companies. In many ways, we stand on the shoulders of these companies. You know, they came in, they had a sort of first generation move into some of these areas, but we're doing things that in my view, go above and beyond what they've been able to do in that first pass. And that's where the excitement really is. So we talk about internally our number one competitors, ourselves, our ability to execute day in and day out, drive value for our customers. That's how we're thinking about it. Jason.
Got it. And you were. We'll come back to this next. Your first enterprise job was at Siebel, right? And we all like as founders, everyone likes to take shots at the last generation. But. But the old competitors that you compete with today, those companies are around. They're huge. They're worth probably a trillion dollars collectively. What did Coupa really get right? What was. What was really 10x better? And how has that changed over time?
That's evolved over time. I think if there's one thing I would point to, and I think it's hopefully near and dear to everyone's heart, here is it's the company and the culture and the spirit of execution and the passion and energy to do things for customers that drive quantifiable measurable value unlike anybody else. The spirit of the company. So there are many things we've done over the years that I think have given us a competitive edge. They've given us differentiation that continues to evolve, without a doubt. But underneath all of that is the spirit of my colleagues at the company. Without any doubt, Jason.
So when you go back in time, you have a network that's underpinning the company. How do you compete with big guys that have a network? What was the wedge that got Koopa off the ground? How did you. Even if Ariba drove me nuts, Ariba worked, right? Ariba was how we paid vendors, People got paid and mountains were moved using this. So what was not everything can be 10x better in the beginning. What was the wet. What was the secret sauce of the wedge?
I love Jason giving me an opportunity to really pitch the differentiated value proposition of Koopa. So you gotta give me a chance.
That's how we learn, right?
You gotta give me a chance to do that.
No, no, please do it. If I interrupt it, I evolve.
No, no. So it evolved, right? So the letters within Koopa all stand for a set of differentiation. The U that's at the very stands for user centricity, which obviously we know is a big, big trend in all of enterprise software. We have to make these applications simple, intuitive, easy to use. That was the starting point. And then we built off of that to the O, which is open, able to integrate to any ERP system, sit on top of existing investments that companies have made to the C, which is comprehensive. So managing every area of spend from procurement expenses, invoicing, sourcing, supplier information management, inventory management, all the way to a accelerated, so getting these deployments to stick quickly driving measurable value to the customer within months and not years. And one of the most exciting areas for me is the P in coupa today, which stands for prescriptive and that's leveraging artificial intelligence and approaches around community intelligence. That's helping every one of our customers get smarter and smarter about the way their company spends money. So we've evolved the value proposition around the vision that gives us a chance to continually differentiate against the sort of non decision when customers stick with baseline investments.
Yeah, and let's just. I don't want to jump around, but since you brought up intelligence, you're sitting on a huge amount of data, right? And unlike some vendors, you have a chance to really do things with this data. But what is big data and ML and AI? What are these things? You're thinking about these things for real? What do these things really mean in the real world and for customers these days? Are these just buzzwords or has the world changed?
I think in 90 something percent of the cases it is buzzwords. And people are adding that into their pitch to get funding and whatnot. And God help you. I mean, listen, if it helps you raise the money, do it right. I'm not going to stand against that. But I think if you could find really interesting use cases where you could apply machine learning, you could really get an accelerator on your business. We have a host of these around our offering, right? Everything from straight through processing of invoices, no one has to do the data entry is an example of that. Or spend analysis where we can help companies understand all the different categories of spend that they have and help them fine tune which areas to optimize. But for Me the most exciting is this element of community intelligence. And to your point, we have a lot of data now, right? Over the last year or so we've transactionally collected nearly $300 billion in spend data and the entire lifetime of the company before that, nine plus years is also a total of about 300 billion spend data. So it's accelerating. What we're doing is we're taking the community concept to this data and looking at ways we can help each individual customer get smarter about a supplier that they should stay away from because there's a lot of disputes with that supplier or they're over invoicing or they're not shipping goods on time or there's a lot of breakage or this is a category where you might consider these suppliers because they're really good at these areas and their price points are better and they can accommodate your needs better. So we're really getting into that place where you know as salesforce is to sales and helping drive revenue. Our vision is to be on the other side of that handshake on the customer to help companies get smarter about the way they spend and applying that community intelligence concept, all of that data normalized prescriptively so that each individual customer gets smarter and smarter and smarter. And that's really, really exciting for us. And I think we're public companies. So forward looking statements of things I can't make. But I can tell you it's one of the things that I'm probably most.
Passionate about and I'm sure that's been a part of the vision in the space for a long time. From a pure technology perspective though, is it different in 2018? Do you feel like however you think about it, a couple from machine learning AI, is the stack really different or are we just accelerating a little bit of compute to hit those goals that you've always had here? You've always wanted to provide intelligence to the customers. That's in the nature of the platform, right?
First of all, you'd want to set up your data in a way that it's more easy to normalize. That's on one. Secondly, you'd want to have contracts with your customers where you have the right to use aggregated, sanitized data from the collective for the benefit of individual customers. So that's definitely changed the speed of computing. A lot of processing has obviously changed. That's helping all of us, you know, without a doubt. So all of these things are happening. We have the chance now to actually provide insights in a way that we never could. So I think it's exceptionally exciting time. I do think 90 plus percent of it is buzz. But the 10 that isn't is going to really impact things in the years to come in a huge way. Yeah.
So let's go back a little bit in time. So your B2B career was Siebel successfactors coupa. Am I missing a gig that you want to describe or is that good enough for the LinkedIn?
I started actually implementing SAP at Accenture. Oh, you did SAP R2 in your.
Early teens or something like that?
21, I think. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The early SAP mainframe stuff. So I've seen the mainframe to the client server, to what we're doing now. It's. I love this industry. I feel like every day is a.
New day and what. But let's go to the last. So you came from SuccessFactors, which is an early, early SaaS leader almost before we knew to call it SaaS. What did you take from that? That you wanted to do better at Koopa? What were the. I mean, SuccessFactors was a great, great exit. In the end, it IPO'd. But what did you want to do even better in the next generation cloud? What were the big learnings as CEO?
Probably the biggest learning for me. And look, every company faces different challenges at different points. So this is not a judgment on what we did at SuccessFactors and what the team did there collectively, but I wanted to take it one customer at a time. I think this change to a SaaS, or what I like to call value as a service model, is once in a lifetime, right? I mean, you wanna try to keep your customers forever, and if you're able to deliver value for them, you should be able to keep them forever. So I wanna make sure that with everything we do, with all the desires to go from 1 to 10 to 10 to 50, and all the things that we talk terms of scaling SaaS to not lose sight of each individual customer and the value that we could deliver for them. And I think that's one of the things we don't talk about enough, to be honest with you, because once you get to a certain run rate, it's not so much about the incremental, it's also about making sure that the core of what you have not only is getting value, but is passionate about what you're doing for them, is recognizing measurable value that's indisputable. So if people leave and they go to other companies, someone else comes in, they can see it. I think that's One of the areas that's very important to me, and we're trying to do it that way, from customers that are few hundred employees to huge multinationals with tens and tens of thousands of users.
Let's dig into customers for life, because it can sound trite, but it's so important. Right? At all scale. But quick question for you first. How much time are you able to spend with customers? You got a lot on your plate, right? How much time are you able to spend with customers?
It depends on the point of time that we're discussing, whether it's a day, a week, a month or whatnot. But I look at my job as managing or supporting three constituencies. So one is customers and prospects. And any one point, I could be spending anywhere from 10% to 90% with that group. Another is my Cooper colleagues. We're nearly a thousand people working with them, operations, making strategic decisions, execution decisions. They still approve every individual that comes into the company in terms of reviewing resumes and approving that, as well as departures. And then a third of it is investors, board members, the public investors and whatnot. So at any given point, you're always navigating some percentage of time into any of those three. And frankly, I love all of them. So I just wish I had more hours a day to do it, quite honestly.
Eddie Gut just to help folks here. And then let's talk about customer life. Better to spend your time with prospects or customers?
Both. Both. Both. Absolutely both. No, no, no. You spend too much time with.
How do you load Balance the two. Because the sales team always wants to bring the CEO into the big deal, right? They all want to bring you into every caterpillar, don't they?
If you spend too much time with customers.
Yes.
They could become the only group that influences what you develop. And you're never going to have the iPhone, right? I mean, that's the example, right? You spend too much time with prospects, you're going to forget about what actually matters on the ground. So you have to balance that. And I think it's really nice to have that interplay because you're interacting with the customer. You're hearing about challenges as well as successes, and you're taking that to the conversation with the prospect also sharing the challenges as well as the successes that you're having. And then it's a real conversation. It's not the 1990s PowerPoint and demo and then good luck and we'll see in three years. It's. We're actually going to make this work together, join our community of like minded folks that want to drive value on the platform we're developing. So you have to be throttling back and forth and that's again, that's what makes it so exciting, so interesting. Yeah.
Do you on if you don't, I should know the metric, but I don't. Do you talk about net negative, net revenue retention or anything publicly? Do you have any numbers? I just want to tee off the conversation. Doesn't matter. It's obviously positive. No question. Right.
You know, historically our renewal rate has been in the 95% without add ons and whatnot.
And without by account.
That's right.
By revenue it's much higher. Right.
And by revenue when you include add ons and users and modules, it's well over 100%. So.
Absolutely. So what is. So what do you what Whether it's at a customer success level or other levels, what's changed in customers for life? And because we are kind of at a. We're all figuring out how important this is. It's hard to learn to go long. It takes time to think in decades. So what any innovative things you're doing, organizationally or otherwise, or doing more in customer marketing vs demand gen marketing or any changes in customer for life.
I think there's one thing that we're doing that's very near and dear to me. It's actually what brought me to got me to get my MBA and come out to Silicon Valley. I'd been doing implementations of large scale enterprise software for a number of years and I felt very frustrated that the customer had paid millions of dollars for a product. They were paying $400 an hour for my services to implement that product. Even though I was getting maybe $30 of that from Mana C Consulting and the projects were really long and it didn't seem like anybody was incented to deliver value for the customer. So what I think we're doing very innovative. I wrote about in a book Value as a service that I wrote, which is for every customer we define measurable success criteria for the deployment and we do that at the pre sales level. We do that all the way through to the handoff for the kickoff of the deployment. And then we get everyone at that kickoff. It's not a new team. They look at the same measurable success criteria. It could be savings generated. They need to generate this much savings within a year, this much usage, this much spend under management, whatever the metric is. And then everybody on the collective team, our professional services partners, the client team themselves, our own internal team is oriented toward Delivering on that success criteria. We track that transactionally in our system. We feed that into Salesforce at the count record. I can see exactly what's happening with every customer. We give them all mouse pads with those measurable success criteria on them for the project team. So that when someone says this is a showstopper. Showstopper, showstopper. When they're really trying to kind of be seen for finding the needle in the haystack, we reorient them back to, does this matter to this company? Is this going to drive value or not? And that's helped us with the A in coupa, which is accelerated. Get to value quicker, quantify the value and build off of that value for a lifetime. And it's one of the things I'm very proud of. We need to continue to refine it. But customer success is not an afterthought for us. It's not glorified tech support where I just kind of be happy and renew. It's how do we continue to grow and evolve the value journey that we're on together. That's what we're doing.
So just so that we can copy, I mean, emulate what you've done, you take the five core KPIs for that customer or the goals for the year, put it on a mouse pad and everyone sees it for each quarter after deployment, through deployment.
No, no, it's given to the implementation team. Oh, the implementation team. And that's just a little hokey thing. But funny enough, it works. The real measure is when we track it transactionally in Salesforce and all these systems. So if a customer actually wants to. We've had situations where a customer, new a leader came in, they've had experience with an incumbent solution and they say, well, I've built my career off that. We're going to switch. I get on the phone with the person and we review the metrics. And they themselves didn't realize that in all the times they've tried it with another solution, they've never delivered that type of value. Now they could go through the hurdle of switching us out because it's an ego thing for them, or they could actually continue on this journey with us and take it to heights they've never done in the past. And so that's the reason for tracking it. Yeah.
So talk a little bit. That's a fun topic about what you've learned on migrations from legacy vendors. It can be scary sometimes for founders. You'll give up on a deal, right? They've got a five year contract With a competitor, we'll never rip it out, we'll never be able to do it. What are the nuances on migrating from old platforms? How do you transition in a new vendor that's a fairly sophisticated product like Koopa? What's the learnings? How do you get in there and make it work?
Well, first of all, the mindset has to be remove any barrier to friction possible. Because. Because ultimately these are change management initiatives. They're not about just software. I started a program, we could build stuff. The point is, can I manage you through the change of whatever way you were doing something to a new way of doing something? So prioritizing the removal of those friction points on that journey is key. Absolutely key. It's one of the things I think we've done relatively well as a wedge sort of in and then making sure that you have Vision Lock with the prospect. And that's, that's a very important point. You have to get Vision Lock with the prospect. If they're evaluating you purely because you're a lower cost solution and they only have this much budget or whatnot, that might not be the right customer for us. You have to have the courage to walk away if you can't get Vision Lock. And Vision Lock is very simple. What is the business impact this initiative is going to have in your organization now? Then I'm happy to compete all day long to prove that we're likely the best partner to help deliver that vision for you. And by the way, if we're not, for some reason, we'll tell you that and we'll say we need to mature in certain areas. We'll see in two years. You gotta have the willingness to do that even in times when it's very hard to make quarters and do the things you gotta do. So I think that's had a lot to do with.
Where is that? That's interesting because I think that's advice founders hear, but sometimes they hear it through a very binary filter. When do you know when to walk away from a deal? That's not a good fit for you, right? It's not. And the CEO sometimes doesn't have alignment with sales or sales has disalignment with the CEO. How do you know which. Which one of those to do?
You have to ask the question, if I'm here 200 days from now, 100 days from now, how will we know whether us working together was successful or not? I mean you've. This conference is saster. It's not Enterprise Software Products Expo.
Right.
We're not selling Some stuff, dropping it off and leaving.
Yes.
We are wanting that relationship with that prospective customers so that they stay with us. So you have to have that posture at the outside. By the way, signing with us is just a step toward you achieving that.
Goal at the very beginning of the journey. Right, exactly.
Of course the salesperson will get, the commission will get paid. They're a wonderful person. But this is just a step along the way. And if you don't have that vision lock with the person, it becomes much, much harder. The whole spirit of the engagement becomes finger pointing and stuff that is incondusive to results.
So if they're not going to be happy in 300 days, don't sign them as a customer oversimplifying it.
You know what I've found, Believe it or not, it's not their fault. But when you ask, how will we know 100 days from now, let's say that we were successful together. When you ask that question, they have to scratch their head. They're not sure because what they've done is they've created a long rfp. They think they know what they need, but they don't necessarily know what they need. We may, in working with them in partnership, know better what could be done than them alone. And if you can make that connection point with the prospect, then you can build a real lasting relationship and everything is going to work a lot smoother. That spirit is very, very important. Yeah. For SaaS. Right.
And just at this stage, does Koopa still have to do RFPs? I don't even know this. I should know this.
Of course we do. What are your.
Just because it's so stressful, what are your tricks to RFPs to make it a less stressful process? Right. Because it just drives founders nuts. Like, I'm gonna lose the deal. It's rigged against me. I have to come in low. I have to do this. What are the. How have you gotten Zen about this process?
I haven't gotten Zen about this.
It still drives you as crazy as it does everyone else in the room?
Absolutely. It's horrible. It's horrible, horrible. So do you know early days, do you fill them in? Of course you fill them in. You fill them all in, but you try to break the mindset of it. I'm thinking back to early deals that we did with some meaningful customers. We'd get the whole company around and we'd hold up that product and we'd take a picture and we'd put on the COVID of the RFP. Now when that person looks at that RFP? Yeah. They're going to go through page 109 line. They don't have this thing, whatever. When they come and said they have it all anyway, which you know, they could build. Right. So. But the spirit maybe will shift. Maybe they'll see, whoa. This is a different type of company. They're willing to work harder, they have a different approach. So things like that have served us well.
Do you ever know bid in rfp, you think?
Absolutely, yeah, absolutely. Often?
Often, yeah. What's the. We'll chat about it, but it, just because it's. It confuses founders so much. How do you know when to know bid an rfp?
First of all, you should have access or try to get access in accounts before any RFP comes out. And you should be able to your.
Dad if the first time you meet him is the rfp.
I think you have a much higher likelihood to win because of other things than the spirit of what you're trying to do. You'll win maybe because you're lower price, because the person, the people that pushed the RFP maybe didn't have budget for something higher anyway. Because you're an outsourced IT shop for the CIO who wants the spirit of Silicon Valley infused in an organization. All kinds of things other than maybe what you're attempting to do. So you want to have those dialogues that I was discussing hopefully well before an RFP comes out. And doing rfp, look, it's not a bad process, right. You could distill a couple of things if it's a thoughtful RFP and not just feature level kind of stuff. But you want to be able to influence the thinking of that prospective customer well before RFP time as much as you can.
Yeah. Let me ask you a high level question on growth versus burn. Right. So coupa is high growth and cash flow positive. Right. Unless I missed a quarter. But I think at least last quarter cash flow positive and high growth. Some folks think it's impossible in SaaS, especially if it's sales driven. So any learnings on all on the trade off between growth and cash flow? Because hoopa seems to have threaded a needle. That is in the old days like Siebel, maybe it was easy, but these days it seems almost impossible to do both sometimes.
Well, I would say a couple things. Number one, you know, the investor sentiment on these things changes all the time. So one day it's growth at all costs, the next day it's path to profitability as quick as possible, then it's growth at all cost.
Can you Keep up as CEO.
So you don't react to this at all. I think you said no, you don't. I mean, you don't try to keep up. You basically, at least my experience with it has been you try to set your own sense for what this business is all about. You manage your sales and marketing efficiency very carefully. There's more than enough literature on this. Byron that was up on the stage I saw earlier, wrote a great paper on that years ago around magic number and sales and marketing efficiency. And you use that as your, your gas for testing areas of the market. In areas where you're doing very, very well. Invest in more in areas that are tangential, be careful, grow it organically. And then over time, as the renewal base, renewal recurring revenue begins to build up and build up, then you have a chance to get gross margin expansion, subscription margin expansion, start dropping some cash to the bottom line and over time, of course, you know, get net income positive. Right. So I think every, every CEO has to think about their business and managing those metrics. But the big takeaway is don't be just reactive. Don't. Now the sentiment is this. Now the sentiment, forget about that. Think about your own business, the climate it's working with, the competitive landscape, the threat of substitutes, the threat of new entrants, port of forces model that's been around for so long and build your business that way.
Yeah, I know. So you're 800 employees or something like that today?
A bit more than that.
Okay. So I know sometimes you still feel like the scrappy upstart, but when did you start to feel like you were becoming the go to brand, at least for some customers, Starting to become a hint of an incumbent and change some of your strategy. Have you gone through that? I mean, I know you want to keep the team aligned as we're attacking, but I imagine the vast majority of your new prospects come in through the brand. I mean, people you're not, it's, you're an iconic vendor. When does that switch happen and how does it kind of change the approach to selling and marketing?
I didn't know that switch happened. It's interesting.
Well, you never know.
You never know, right?
You get invited to more deals than you did a few years ago, don't you?
That's right. That's right. Well, we are sensitive.
You get invited to every deal now. That's in your sweet spot. No, no, no, no.
Awareness is massive. I mean, you talked about the advantages of some of the incumbents. I mean, one advantage is massive, massive marketing budget and The. And the first step of marketing is awareness.
And there is 100% account penetration. Right. That's what I learned being in the Fortune. They think about accounts differently.
Right.
So you're still. You still don't have awareness, even at your scale.
That's interesting. Absolutely not. I think we're well past the early adopter phase of this journey. Yes, we think we're in the early majority phase, but we are. Our biggest challenge, I would say, is awareness. Because, look, the platform is secure, it's scaling, the references are exciting, we're doing amazing things that we're really proud of. But awareness Broadleaf is still very.
But you've got these, like, these iconic deals you closed recently, like Caterpillar and Toyota read about. Were you the upstart in those deals or were you the number one vendor going in and still had to win them?
In a lot of the larger deals we closed over the past couple of years, we walked into situations where the customer, we call it internally, they're a burn victim. In other words, they've used other solutions, big, complex solutions in the past, and they've been burned because they've had limited adoption, limited measurable value they could point to. And so now that we've gotten to a level of credibility and legitimacy as a public company and invisibility financials, they feel like, okay, this is a company that is poised to be the winner of a developing category. And we were open to engaging with them. And when they do and we go through all the permutations, we've been really fortunate enough to get those chances, and we've done right by these customers.
Now, the burn victim's an interesting one, right? How long in the enterprise? It took me a while to figure that out. How long does it take for the burn to happen, be realized, and then have a big company take action? Because that's a whole cycle, isn't it? Are you seeing folks that got burned that you met three to four years ago that you're getting today?
Absolutely.
It doesn't happen in a year in the enterprise, does it?
In some cases, seven years. There were doors we were knocking on seven years ago where they wouldn't take it seriously, where now they are and they have, and they're spending millions of dollars with us. But that's seven years.
Did you know that a lot of those. Did you know when you lost the deal seven years ago you might get them today? Were you able to think that long term? Absolutely.
In Salesforce, I could see them and I know when they come back up, believe Me, there's no. There's no question. I know where they are. And the people might have turned over three, four times, but that's hard, right? Value was not delivered. The value is not the way.
You have dedicated marketing to folks for deals that you lost, but you're going to get back because you know they're burned. Do you approach that any.
It's not at that scale where we've applied marketing to it distinctly. But many of us have been around for a while. We know, we monitor it.
We're aware. But related to that just so when you lose, I know you're winning all the deals today, but when you lose a deal, when you lose a caterpillar, which never happens, but do you get the team aligned on re winning it in three years because you know they lost it to a. They're a burn victim in waiting. Like, do you think through that or do you just revisit it in a year or two?
No, people stay engaged. People stay engaged with these folks and then they monitor. Look, if they become highly successful with another solution, that's fine. I mean, that's the spirit of competition. That's not happening a lot. I'm saying that honestly. Honestly. But if it is happening in certain cases through brute force or through some other approaches, hey, listen, that's the spirit of competition. But we've been fortunate enough to have a chance to do really special things for these customers. And we think we're just starting. So yeah, we keep a list.
Did the. Just interesting in terms of scale because you still think so. Do you think the ipo, especially with more conservative customers, it gave you the legitimacy that you didn't have before? It was a real boost because you always share financials. But being public does help to close these big deals.
So when we did the roadshow, we said we're not doing it for the money. We're doing it largely for that stamp of the day legitimacy and market awareness. After one quarter, I didn't know whether it really worked. Second quarter, it started to become relatively statistically significant to say it did work. By the third quarter, we could sense that it was working. And that stamp of legitimacy did increase the likelihood of early, early majority customers signing with us and getting value. And that's been. That's been great. So.
So IPO is the learning, right? Don't. Don't. For us, that was waiting, waiting 10 years. And the enterprise may have some downsides. Right. All right, we're out of time. Any last advice for the group you want to give that you can think of before we take advantage of this opportunity.
You know, I used to go to a lot of conferences, maybe of this type or like it, and I always thought the answer to a lot of these questions was outside of me. So, in other words, someone else's advice or whatnot, which is always very important to influence your decision. But if you're CEO of a company, you're on a management team of a company, I think a lot of the answers are in internal really trust your instinct, your gut, really feel through what is you're trying to achieve in a marketplace, and then give it all the passion, energy you have, and one way or another, you know, you'll break through. At least that's that's that's my sense.
All right, let's give it up for a founders founder, Rob Bernstein from Koopa. Thank you.










