Successful Scaling Across Markets, From a Founder Turned VC | OMERS Ventures MP Harry Briggs

Harry Briggs (founder of drinks brand Firefly; now a VC at OMERS Ventures) gives a conference talk on scaling across markets, drawing on his founder experience, colleague Jambu’s Uber playbook, and portfolio company cases. Core messages: avoid premature/geographic sprawl ("don't do it/keep it simple"); confirm product-market fit and repeatable acquisition/unit economics before expanding; understand what must be adapted per market (regulation, customer behaviour, labels/ingredients); hire strong local leaders and build an executable, iterated playbook for launches; consider alternatives (deepen home market or vertical expansion). Case studies include Firefly, Uber, Revolut, Paddle, GoCardless, Plum Guide and Gusto; practical metrics discussed include NPS, retention/cohorts, CAC/LTV and contribution margin.
Questions this video answers
2003
2012
September 15, 2022
Chapters
Morning, everyone. Hope everyone's feeling reasonably recovered from all the parties last night and lovely to be here in Barcelona. My name is Harry Briggs. I'm going to be talking about scaling across markets and I think originally, by the way, I should confess, this talk was going to be given by my colleague Jamboo, who scaled Uber across multiple markets. I'll talk a bit more about him in a session, in a second. But. But I am his obviously partner and. And had my own much more modest story. So a little bit about me. So I started my career. Sorry, some of these haven't quite come through McKinsey. Then I started a drinks company called Firefly, which you may have seen, it's still around. We started it way back. I'll talk a bit more about it and. And scaled it across 30 markets and eventually sold it to private equity around 2012. Then I became a VC at Bulletin and now I'm a VC at Omer's Ventures, Global Canadian venture investor, early stage investor. And I should probably mention as it's kind of Pride Month, I've done quite a bit for the sort of pushing diversity in the venture world. Obviously limited success, but a little perhaps. And this is our team today, as you can see, we like hanging out in Woodlands in Buckinghamshire and we seem to have a propensity for wearing yellow. And the guy in the middle there is Jamboo, who, as I say, might have been on stage, but his wife gave birth to a baby girl on Friday, which is why he is. You've got me instead. So over the course of now, nearly 12 years in venture, I've been lucky enough to work with some pretty amazing founders. And sorry, some of these logos seem to have got a little bit corrupted in the transfer just now. But yes, companies like Revolut, the Hat Group, Gusto Paddle, and as you can see, a lot of these companies have scaled to multiple markets and built global businesses. And I've been lucky enough to see something of their journeys along the way. But I thought I'd start a little bit. I realized that my company was not a SaaS company, but the company that I founded mainly because I think it taught me a few lessons about some of the things not to do when scaling internationally. So Firefly was, as you can see, we started it in 2003. We launched and the idea was it was a healthy natural energy drink, a sort of healthier alternative to the Red Bulls that were huge at the time. Still are pretty huge. And then a weird thing happened, which is that within about three months of us Launching. We launched in Harvey Nichols and Selfridges and some very upmarket London stores. We got a call from this very cool shop in Paris called Colette, and they said, hey, we've seen your drink in Selfridges. Can we order some for Paris? And we had this weird dilemma of, like, you know, we were thinking our plan was stay in the UK for two or three years, figure out, you know, what we're doing, and then scale internationally, maybe next market after that. But before we knew it, you know, we couldn't really say no to Colette. They were a very trendy store. They said, look, we'll handle all the customs, don't worry. Then we got a call from Denmark and then a call from Japan, and before we knew it, we were in 20 countries. And that seemed great at the time. We were like, well, look, our sales are growing. We're selling pallets and pallets of drinks and containers of drinks to across the world. It's very exciting. We feel cool. But then you start to realize some of the downsides of that, like the distraction, like the fact that, you know, some of our labels had to be in multiple languages, which meant that when we changed a product, we had to sort of change a whole lot of different labels, meant that our inventory became more complicated. All the sort of stuff that you would expect as a former management consultant, to have thought about, but, you know, can easily overlook. Anyway, I'm going to skip forward because clearly this was not a SaaS company and you want to focus on some of the bigger learnings here. But we hit the global financial crisis in 2009, 2008, we needed to scale back. That gave me an opportunity to move into VC at Bulletin, which was great. And in 2012, we sold the business to private equity. Made some money for our investors, sadly, not a lot for ourselves, but as I say, learned quite a few things along the way. So I'm going to talk a bit about some lessons learned from that experience, some lessons learned from Jamboo's Uber experience, and some lessons learned from some of the companies I've been lucky enough to work with over the last decade. So the first rule of international expansion. Anybody want to guess? That's a very good one, but mine was don't do it. But, yeah, that's kind of the same. Keep it simple. So why do I say that? Well, first look at Uber. I'm sorry if you can't read all the names here, but look at how big they were able to get just scaling across more cities in the US and how much simpler it is to scale to another US City versus scaling to Bangalore or Lyon or Melbourne, for example. And so I think the question that you should be asking when you're thinking about going international is are you expanding to escape your problems, or do you actually have something worth scaling? And look, I confession Firefly. You know, we had a really good launch. Sales were growing really fast, and then they were beginning to kind of plateau a little bit. And so when these international sales came through, it was like, great. We can hit our targets by selling pallets to the Middle east and obscure Caribbean islands, but it didn't necessarily solve our problems, and it probably was distracting us from figuring out how to scale properly. So let's look back at this Uber expansion again. You know, the Jambu part of the story. So they were only in San Francisco for more than a year when they started. They didn't go international. You can't quite see the bottom here, but that's 2010, 2012, Paris. But look at what happens here in 2013. Incidentally. A few months after Jambu joins the business to run international expansion in Emea, they're suddenly able to scale to multiple cities in a very short space of time. At one point, they were opening a new city every three days. And that's because they finally, you know, figured out a playbook that figured out how to scale properly. And I'll come back to some of the, some of the ways that they did that. So assuming that we're going to ignore the don't do it, what questions should we be asking before expanding? First question. Have we got it right? And I'm going to go into these in a bit more detail, but, you know, have we got the business right? Is this working? Have we got it repeatable? So it might be working in this market, but have we just been lucky? Have we had great pr? Have we had something that isn't necessarily easy to replicate in new markets? Do we understand what is different about the next market? Again, I'll come back to more of this. Do we have the team for expansion and for Uber, that was probably the most important thing. And is it worth it? Is it going to give us a good roi? So here are some questions to perhaps assess. Have we got it right? That first question. So do customers love our product? In Firefly's case, we actually had very good NPS score. You know, we were, we were, we were pretty, pretty confident on that front. Are the customers staying now? In Uber's case, as you probably know, they built their business a lot around Referrals and giving people free rides. And then they found that once people had had a couple of free rides, they tended to stay. And you know, in Firefly's case, we had very little data. We knew how much the stores were selling, but we didn't know whether it was the same people buying multiple times or lots of people trying it once and never coming back. So the joy of software businesses clearly. Do we have a scalable acquisition model? I'll give you some measures on this as well. And do we feel good about the unit economics? So there's a lot on the slide now, sorry, but obviously measures for this Net promoter score, are they staying? We can look at the retention, we can look at the cohort. Ideally, particularly in marketplace businesses, cohorts should be improving as you scale. So Uber, as you probably know, they would start in a very small part of the city, they'd get really good supply in that small area so that the customer got a great first experience. And then once they had evidence that people were coming back and ordering more Ubers, then they could gradually expand the area that Uber covered until they covered the whole city. And that should improve because obviously that product experience is improving as you have more drivers and so you should see an improvement. Do we have a scalable acquisition model? So you know, you can look at what percentage of your customers are coming through organic. You can look at how many customers are referring more customers obviously CAC, LTV we all know about in the SaaS world and gross margin and contribution margin. Clearly you only want to be scaling if you've got at least visibility of positive contribution margins. You don't want to be scaling and losing more money with every extra customer, which there are a few examples of recently again, my, my learnings at Firefly here, you know, we, we, we had the NPS but we didn't necessarily have the data. I just wanted to highlight a couple of one other example. So Paddle did how many people saw Christian present here yesterday? Brilliant. And I can't see him here, but. But no, I was lucky enough to be one of his first backers as a VC and I think for Paddle they had amazing retention and fantastic unit economics. But I would say they took a while to find their expansion playbook and it wasn't really until they hired a dedicated US team. So they were UK based and selling globally from the UK for a long time. It wasn't until they had a team completely dedicated to the US that the US really, really started to take off. And I suppose one other learning there in Terms of the repeatable was, you know, they, they had one huge whale customer called MacPaw and MacPaw kept growing themselves. So it was flattering their growth numbers. But it's easy to, to sort of convince yourself, hey, it's great, we're growing, everything's good. But actually you still might not have a scalable acquisition model because you might just be growing the customers you already have, which is obviously a great thing in SaaS, but may not be enough. Second, big question, is our success repeatable? So do we know what levers to pull? So if you're Uber and you're scaling, what are your levers? You can try and have more drivers on the platform, you can change the referral bonuses, you can obviously, you know, do more marketing, can do more pr. Secondly, do we know how to be more efficient now than we were back then? So ideally, every new country you go into, you know, every country is going to have issues. We'll talk about that in a second. But you want to be, you want to know that there's, that you're learning something, you're improving the playbook each time. And lastly back to that scalable acquisition model. So some of the measures here from the Playbook, you can obviously look at, you know, what's the cac, which is obviously going to vary by market and therefore how much are you prepared to invest in each new market depending on how those first few months go. As I say, you should be improving the playbook and a lot of the same referral rate organic acquisition that we mentioned in the previous one. I'm going to skip over this because I think I've covered it, but a couple of more relevant examples to you perhaps go cardless. I was fortunate enough to also invest when I was at Balderton. I think in that kind of company where you have a regulated entity, you've got some additional questions around. The key thing for them was they needed to get a sort of pan European license that allowed them to scale across Europe rapidly. But they were also waiting for a lot of European countries to implement the sort of direct debit, the common, it's called CEPA direct debit platform, before they could really scale. And so they were kind of dependent on external forces. Plumguide actually just. Sorry, one, one other thing on GoCardless was they were scaling nicely in the UK, but perhaps they were going after the wrong customer initially. So they were, they were particularly going after companies that sold a lot of consumer direct debits. But shortly after I stepped off the board there, they figured out that actually the biggest market they could go after was B2B invoice payments. And the moment that they figured that out, that was suddenly a much, much more scalable business that they could roll out way faster. And again, perhaps if they had been trying to manage too many markets too soon, they wouldn't have figured that out. And the Plum Guide is a kind of premium Airbnb that I've been close to for a few years. And I think for them, this is a different proposition because obviously travelers don't want to only go to one city, so you can launch in London, but it's very, very hard to market only to people coming to London. So it was very key for them that they rolled out to a lot of cities quite quickly. The trouble was that they had, because they're a very premium proposition where they were testing every home and making sure it lived up to their standard and they were only approving 10% of homes. That's hard to scale. But the pandemic actually helped them because it forced them to be way more efficient, it forced them to conserve cash, and they managed to automate a lot of those tests and they changed the model slightly so that I hope I'm not betraying confidences here, but they don't actually do the test until the first booking comes in. And then obviously, if that isn't up to scratch, they find an alternative home. But their biggest problem was they were having to test all these homes before they knew whether they were actually going to be profitable. Good homes that people wanted to book. And once they figured that out, they were way more able to scale. Thirdly, do we understand what is different? This is a very, very old article. Carrefour exiting Japan and Mexico. And another one, this is from 10 years ago. Tesco's American dream over. Do you remember? The Brits in the room may know, or the Americans in obscure parts of California might know that they launched a new retail concept in California. They invested well over a billion in it. And despite the fact that Car 4 had failed in multiple markets, despite the fact that the endless roadkill of retailers going internationally, you know, Tesco did acres and acres of research and focus groups and consumer testing, and they were absolutely convinced that Fresh and Easy was going to solve every consumer's problems in California, but it failed and it's hard. So I guess really, really understanding what's different about the market. Now, these are the questions that Uber tended to ask when they entered new markets. Firstly, what are our non negotiables? And secondly, where do we have to adapt. So, as you know, Uber played a little bit fast and loose when they were expanding. They definitely asked for forgiveness rather than permission. And that worked in some markets in somewhere like Cape Town. It's probably the right strategy, but maybe not in Berlin or Copenhagen, where I think, you know, they've. They've really struggled because they've fallen out with the regulators so much. And then where do we have to adapt? You know, clearly every market, you know, particularly in financial services or fintech, Every market has its nuances and some of those are worth, you know, investing in, solving for. And sometimes it's just not worth it. My learnings from the Firefly days, you know, I mentioned obviously we had to translate all our labels into multiple languages. And I mean, I do remember this sort of hilarious moment when our Japanese distributor was having to stick, manually stick a label on every single one of I think, two and a half thousand bottles. She said she organized a kind of party for her friends to come and help. It doesn't sound much of a party, but we also had some ingredients because we were using various herbal medicinal products. The regulations were different in every market, and they were allowed in some markets and not in others. So then we found ourselves more and more constrained because obviously we didn't want to make a drink that could only be sold in some of our markets. But ultimately that kind of meant the product got a bit watered down. You know, it wasn't quite as powerful as it might have been. It obviously slowed our product development because we had to, you know, verify everything in multiple markets each time we changed the product. And as I say, it took away our focus from having a scalable, repeatable model. And I think if we had really, really focused on, okay, what is our playbook in the UK to, you know, reach true product, market fit and really, really figure that out, I think it would have been better. That black logo was supposed to be Revolut. Sorry, I don't know what happened. And it must be Mac to a PC conversion. But Revolut, as you probably know, is in about the whole of Europe and Australia, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland. I was lucky enough to be part of Revolut's seed round, and they've rolled out rapidly. Obviously, they've had a number of regulatory challenges as they've grown. And one of the key ones has been obviously their crypto trading, which is a big revenue driver for them. They're allowed to do that in some markets, but not in others. Likewise, their share trading regulated differently in different markets. And obviously them being able to Offer full banking services as opposed to just deposit services is something they're still working on in many markets but, but clearly they were, you know, keen to be international from day one. But compare that to seed Legals. I'm an angel investor, that is that allows how many people know Sealed Legals? Cool Sea Legals allows you to do all of your legal setup of your company and, and, and, and raise money in a sort of automated way. They're only in the UK and France because the legal system is so different in every country that to replicate that in every market is possible, but requires huge investment. Then do we have the right team? I'm going to speed up a little here, but clearly this was a massive part of Uber's success. They gave a lot of autonomy to teams in each city. Jambu at one point was, as I say, hiring a team or at least a leader for a new city every week. And then I guess looking at how well they execute compared to other cities and making the changes rapidly when they're not working out. But also do we have the talent centrally, clearly you need a reporting structure. You need someone like Ajambu who's able to motivate the team and you know, check how it's going. And you know, firefly wise, by the way, you know, we operated in a different way, which was that we had a whole lot of distributors come to us and say, hey, can we distribute your product in Denmark or Sweden or wherever it was. And our management, you know, we eventually hired someone who just made sure that everyone was sharing best practice between those markets. So, you know, here are the latest marketing materials, here are the latest things that we're finding are working. You know, this is how to do a sampling. Well, this is the kinds of stores that you should be in. This is the best shelf space to be in, the products you want to be near, all that kind of thing. That was my Firefly team when we were in 30 countries. It wasn't a very big team and I think that was probably part of the problem. But obviously awesome people. Is it worth it? What's the upside of the expansion? Can we reach a large town with our home market as mentioned, and do we have the cash? Clearly we've seen a lot of companies fail because they splash out a lot of money to expand internationally and then find actually the new market just isn't as good as the previous one. And in the current climate where it's a little bit harder to raise money, particularly if the unit economics aren't there, you know, it's a big risk. So do you want to test, you know, that second city a little bit more gradually first and prove yourself and look, you don't have to go international. Gusto again, I've been an investor while I was an investor in a previous fund and Gusto is the sort of more premium, hello fresh in the UK if you like. And they've become the market leader in the UK and by relentlessly focusing on executing in the uk, you know, they've built a really valuable business. They recently got valued at well over a billion and they made the call early on. Look, we just want to be the winner in this market and because they're able to bring a whole lot of automation into their, into their, you know, factories, because they're able to really, really optimized distribution, you know, they're able to build a more profitable business than perhaps if they tried to do multiple markets at once. Oh dear, Sorry, these, these logos didn't come through but this was supposed to be some of the more successful companies I've worked with, like Revolut, like gocardless, that obviously did go international and are all now, you know, billion plus valuation companies. So just to just a reminder that, you know, you don't have to, but obviously it's great if you can and there are alternatives. You can go deeper in your home market, you can go vertically versus horizontally, I guess Firefly wise. You know, we, we, we, we tried to expand in terms of the range, you know, we, we brought out a water range. We, we looked at doing shots, we looked at more occasions for the drinks. But ultimately I think, you know, the right strategy there would probably have been more of the kind of red Bull like strategy which is have one really kind of ownable proposition. Revolut, as I said, you know, they've expanded into crypto trading, share trading, business banking, whereas someone like Stripe has just been very, very horizontal and global. In terms of expansion models. A few things to think about the role of technology, clearly, how centralized are you going to be? Are you going to give autonomy to markets like as Uber did, or are you just going to have the same product everywhere? More like Paddle, for example, are there partners you can work with? That was our strategy at Firefly. How capital intensive are you going to be about it and who can help? Who's done it before who, you know, hopefully your investors have done this. Obviously Omers Ventures has people in Toronto, in New York, in Palo Alto. So we'd like to think we can certainly help with expansion that way. Plug over and then obviously which country first? So where do you have a structural advantage today? If it's a law company and you're in the uk, you've probably got a structural advantage in other companies that use English law or that certainly look to English law. What's the regulatory climate? Clearly some are more similar than others. And when do you take on the most competitive market? This is a big question that often comes up on the boards that I'm on, which is that clearly taking on the most competitive market is going to be really expensive and really risky. But the downside of not taking on the most competitive market is that maybe you don't have to kind of force yourself to get up to the standard of the very best. And what we have seen in Europe quite a bit is companies that became regional winners, but then the global winner came in at some point and kind of steamrolled, not completely, but eroded their market and stopped them from growing. And so look, I think if you do believe that you've got a superior product that can win internationally, I would embrace it. But clearly there's a lot of roadkill of companies that probably could have become regional winners but tried, you know, too hard to compete against someone better funded with perhaps a better product. So just coming back to Uber, back to Jamboo, the guy in the woods in our team, and here are sort of his key lessons from that experience. So they were very good. I'm just going to change hands, sorry. They were very good at building a playbook and constantly iterating it and improving it with every market they went into. And, you know, this playbook came, you know, literally every detail of how to launch a market. It was basically an asana, but it was a full project plan and you could give it to someone and say go. And you know, obviously there were plenty of questions, but they went, clearly you need to understand what's different. And I think Uber would say that, you know, they probably didn't do a good enough job of this in some markets, but in Uber's case it might be, you know, how much drivers are paid or how good is the existing taxi competitive infrastructure or how aggressive are the regulators in the city. Build culture carriers. Again, Uber got a lot of bad press as they were growing for some of their cultural errors. I think at the same time though, they did have an incredible culture where a culture of performance where people were incredibly motivated and worked incredibly hard and, and I think you're always going to have things that go wrong in that climate. I think perhaps what they could have done a little More is have a few more examples from senior leadership of making the right call rather than always the most aggressive call. And I think they might have ended up in a better place today if they had. And keeping the hiring bar high. I learn every day from my colleague Jambu on this that we all know that one B player in A team can lead to a lot of C players quite rapidly. And making those calls early and keeping the bar high and only entering a market once you've found that a player I think is probably key to their expansion. A few final thoughts. So clearly, when you're expanding internationally, the second market is usually the hardest because you don't have a playbook yet and you're going to be hit with a whole lot of surprises. Write the playbook once you've done it, because you're going to be busy, you're going to be running around solving issues. Every time one of these things comes up, note it down, put it in the plan for the next one, try and avoid it happening again. Clearly, lesson for me particularly, you know, you're unlikely to find product market fit in country two if you haven't found it in country one. And sustainable scale models, clearly there are, you know, there are the models of let's go to 50 markets and let's raise hundreds of millions and even if we get massively diluted, hopefully we'll win. There are also models where you grow sustainably. I mean, in the uk, Pizza Express, for example, for many years rolled out by taking the cash flow from the successful restaurants they had and deploying that into the next restaurant. It allowed them to open two a year and then maybe three a year and then maybe four year. And they built an amazing business worth hundreds of millions in that approach and retained a lot of the equity. And so, you know, don't, don't rule that out. And just to reiterate, the team, the team, the team, you know, getting the right people to lead this. You probably heard Jason yesterday talking about sales directors. You know, probably the hardest role that I see in the companies I work with is, you know, a European team hiring their first US Sales director. And they always seem to get it wrong and they probably always give that person a bit too long before they realize they've got it wrong. But take advice from the good founders, you know, who've managed to get it right. Do all those referrals, don't fall into that kind of optimistic trap of we found someone, I want them to be right. So that's just, you know, that's confirmation bias. Our way into hiring them. Sadly, we've only got two minutes left, so I might have time for like one question. If anybody had a question, I'll have to probably give you the mic, if so. Oh, there's a mic. A raving mic. Somebody be brave. And if not. Ah, there we go. Hi.
Hi. Thanks for a great talk. So, as a founder who is considering international expansion, you talk a lot about doing research and even big companies like Uber getting it wrong. So how do you. For example, we are a Spanish company. Let's assume, just for the sake of discussion that we want to expand to China. Right, Worst idea in the world. But let's assume that there are so many unknown unknowns that we wouldn't even know how to start. So how to start doing research for a new market when you know nothing about it? And I mean, China is an extreme example, but let's say from France, Italy, the uk, even within Europe, there are many things that you wouldn't know unless you are an expert or you have lived there for many years.
It's a great question. So how do you get into a market that you know nothing about? I mean, look, the only company I've been involved with that has expanded to China successfully was the Hut Group, out of which is an E commerce player. And the reason that they expanded was that they started to get demand there. They happened to be selling, for example, a whole lot of protein that a lot of Chinese consumers were nervous of buying the local protein. And when they saw that start to happen, they started to explore it more. And I, I mean, obviously I don't know what your business is, but, but I think when you start to see organic demand from a market, that's often a good way to start because then you can go to those customers and say, you know, why are you buying this? You know, what are the local alternatives? What's the difference in your market? And certainly we found with my drinks company, you know, we learned more from talking to the people that loved us than anything else really. You know, you're trying to find more of those people.










