This content was created by Scott Perry. This content was uploaded by Scott Perry. This is a YouTube workshop Q&A titled "RATING Scott's Clarity Hierarchy Presentation from 1 to 10! [V.6 of 10]" (created 2024-09-22). The excerpt captures an English discussion led by Scott Perry with Catalyst Club members/attendees (labeled Speaker B, Penny, and Catherine). Participants rate and reflect on Scott's presentation, share "aha" moments, compare his concise 30-minute format to a longer prior workshop, discuss principles vs tactics, clarity of offers, and next steps (including a brief mention of the Close the Gap program). The exchange is a post-workshop implementation/Q&A session with practical feedback and philosophical takeaways.
Chapters
But I have time now for everyone here who is already— since you're already all Catalyst Club members, let's, uh, let's jam on some implementation and Q&A. Just, uh, if you don't mind, start with— start with on a scale of 1 to 10, no 7s allowed, 10 being very useful and 1 being useless. How useful was or helpful was this workshop?
Can I go first?
You can.
Okay, so I have watched the workshop by Rakeshi, and you did it in 30 minutes, but he did it in 3 days. And I really like— right now it's more clear, uh, each step with the type of examples and The examples that you gave, now I really understand their, their, their heritage.
Awesome. My intent is to try to get better at being clearer and more succinct with, with these things so that they're easier for you all to execute. Go ahead, Penny.
No, I just want to say it, you know, I'd give it a 9 or a 10 because I have heard and read this and I have, I have listened loop and some kind of video go through it. But today I thought the way you put it together and I am big, as Emma said, the examples you gave, the comparison between form and function and that, that's just fitting into what I'm trying to do right now. So thank you. Yeah.
Yeah. You're very welcome. I just dropped a link back in the chat, everyone, because I actually accidentally sent it only to Katherine. But if you're looking for where you can access the eventual replay and all that, it'll be in that document, and I'll also send you an email. Any other reflections? And I would love some questions, or if anybody wants to workshop their way through it, happy to do that as well.
Oh, and so for me, uh, sign of a good workshop is how many aha moments I have. So a total of 3 this time. So I'm going to give you a 10, Scott, because that's like extra. There was, there's definitely, well, you know, though you hear it, but it doesn't register until you've heard it enough times that— so today, even though I've have heard this before, there was just something clicked today, especially around when it's not working, go back to my principles, because I tend to not do that. I tend to— the tactic's not working, so I'm going to find another tactic. And I know, like, now I will see that hierarchy in my head, that smallest piece is the tactic, and I stick with my principle even though it's slow going. And, and I think that's maybe my biggest problem is how slow going it is. And I think now that one of my ahas, other ahas, was I don't have a clear enough offer. Then that's why what I'm doing is not getting traction. So something I really need to work on is finding a clear enough offer and then putting it in front of enough people to see if it is actually clear and resonates with a specific audience.
Yeah, I appreciate that. Well, a couple reflections on the reflection. Number one,— it goes back to the— my favorite Heraclitus quote, "No one steps in the same river twice because neither are they the same person nor is it the same river." Right? So, I presented these ideas before, not in the same way that I did, and you were at a different point when you collided with that presentation. So, we're both coming at this at a new time in a new place, a new point in the river's flow. So, that's why it's so important. And I'm sharing this just as a takeaway for everyone, that you return to principles and review them, why you return to really impactful books and reread them, because you will glean additional insight and lessons that you could not have possibly got the previous time because you were not ready or you were not in an environment where they could be applied.— And then just to the whole idea that things are not going as fast as I would like, and that's always true. However, when you approach things in this very system-oriented approach based on philosophy and principles, you have a better chance for increasing velocity over time, and you'll end up where you want to be— slower than you want but faster than anyone else thinks possible. Because actually, very, very few people cross the finish line in terms of doing, getting the result that they actually want and the way, in a way that actually aligns with who they are, what they're good at, and where they belong. And I'll just float it out there, Catherine, that working on your offer in the Close the Gap program would be an excellent way to catalyze your progress. But that, that's as pitchy as I'm going to get right now.
