Shagility describes a platform failure where automation bypassed a critical design layer, routing data directly from history to consume. The system's validation caught it, but only because missing rules lived in a separate tenancy. Tenancy boundaries created blind spots that nearly broke the safeguard.
Chapters
So it's like that over there, move it over there. I don't, shouldn't have to like bring it up and copy and paste it. And normally it does a really good job. And this time, you know, we run a layered architecture and it's opinionated. So we have to go from history to our design layer, right? And we have to go from our design layer to the consume layer, right? Because the consume layer is automated. And the bloody thing goes and writes me a change rule that goes from history to consume direct. And it won't run, right? We have controls in place that it just won't run. It won't validate. And I saw it there and I'm like, why'd you do that? And it went, oh, because there's no rules for the middle tier, for the design layer in the tenancy you pointed me at. And I'm like, really? And then I went, ah, shit, yeah, we run a data clean room. So for this customer, so actually that logic is sitting in another tenancy for the provider of the data.