A Simple Intra-day Trading Strategy For 50%++ Gains Per Month
In this instructional video, The Art of Crypto presents a concise three‑step framework for high‑probability intra‑day crypto trades. The method centers on identifying liquidity sweeps—moments when market makers clear opposing‑side liquidity (sell‑side in an uptrend, buy‑side in a downtrend)—which often precede rapid price expansions. Step 1 involves analyzing a higher timeframe to locate key levels and form a bias narrative about the market’s likely direction. Step 2 moves to a lower timeframe (typically a 4‑6× lower resolution) to pinpoint precise execution levels that align with the higher‑timeframe bias. Step 3 focuses on execution: waiting for a liquidity sweep followed by a displacement candle, then entering with a stop placed under the sweep wick and targeting 3‑10 R. The presenter explains active versus passive entry styles, risk management (1 % account risk, stop‑loss placement, R‑multiple targets), and the importance of probabilistic, scenario‑based thinking. He also stresses trading psychology, highlighting the preservation of “mental capital” by avoiding stagnant positions and managing confidence. Practical examples using Bitcoin on 1‑hour and 15‑minute charts illustrate each step, including how to filter irrelevant levels, use session timing (e.g., London Open), and set limit orders for passive trading.
Chapters
What's up everyone, welcome back to another video. In this video, I'm going to be teaching you my simple 3-step framework that I use to get high probability trades on a day-to-day basis. This is very simple, very high probability, and going to benefit you immensely if you were to watch this video. So the overarching theme of this strategy is that we're looking for counterparty liquidity sweeps in the trend, and how that looks like is exactly, let's say, within this trade here that I took yesterday. I got a 2.8R in a matter of a couple of hours, and even though the market was going higher at the time, if you Were to zoom out for a bit, I actually waited for sell-side liquidity to get taken out, which is a liquidity sweep over here, before entering, which led to this up move. The reason why this works is because usually if the market is in a buy program, sell-side liquidity sweeps, meaning swing lows, when they get swept, it usually leads to an explosive expansion in price towards the upside. The reason why this happens is twofold. Number one, in order to bring the markets higher, the market makers, which are the people that move the markets, and also they don't necessarily have to be people, could also be algorithms. But these algorithms and people, or let's just call them market makers for short, they need fuel in order to drive the markets higher. And where do they get fuel? Well, I want you to think of it this way. The market is a zero-sum game, meaning for every dollar that you do make, you're not actually making that money out of thin air. It's not like business. When you win any money, you are actually taking it from somebody else. For every dollar that you make, somebody else is losing a dollar. And most of the time, that somebody else tends to be the market makers. So it's in the market makers' best interest to cause as many people to lose as possible. And in the process, when other people lose And I'm giving it to the market makers who use it to continue moving the markets in the direction that they've set already. So in this case, let's say that you're in an uptrend. In order for the markets to continue going higher, you actually need to stop out anybody that went long here at any point here who are in deep profits. You have to stop them out before the markets can continue another expansion. This is the reason why you get these liquidity sweeps within a trend and also retracements before the market pumps. In this video specifically, this framework's gonna focus on the liquidity sweep that leads to an expansion in price and a very high-level overview The setup of this system includes 3 steps. Step 1, you wanna look for your higher timeframe. Now within the higher timeframe segment, there are 2 things that we wanna look for in particular. First of which is to determine your higher timeframe key levels, and then using those key levels to determine the higher timeframe bias. Then we move on to step number 2, which is doing our work on the lower timeframe. In this case, we want to look for some kind of liquidity level slash execution level that matches with the trend that we're trading in, and it also matches with the higher timeframe bias. This is a very key word. And then step 3, we move on to execution, which is specifically we want to look for some kind of a liquidity sweep into a displacement. Now as for what this actually means, you will find out throughout this video. Just to give you a practical example, let's use Bitcoin right now where it is. So for the purpose of this video, going to be using the 15-minute chart as well as the 1-hour timeframe as my higher timeframe, lower timeframe combo. The reason why it's the 15-minute and the 1-hourly, well, other than the fact that the 15-minute chart and the 1-hour combo is one of my favorite timeframes to trade, this also happens to fall within the rules that I've set when it comes to picking timeframes. Because it doesn't matter what timeframe you're using this on, As long as your lower timeframe and your higher timeframe is separated by a factor of 4 to 6, then it's going to be a perfect timeframe combo. For example, if you prefer longer trades and you prefer trading on the 1-hourly chart, zero problem. Just use the 4-hourly chart as your higher timeframe and you're good to go. So going back into the video, let's start with step number 1. Step number 1 is to determine your higher timeframe key levels. It's the first thing that you do. And to do that, it's very simple. So it's as simple as going out, zooming out, and then looking at which range is price trading in at the moment. You can argue that price at the moment is trading between these 2 levels, right? Being the range high, this being a range low. So basically what I'm doing here, I'm just taking some kind of extreme level and then see if it matches up with some kind of range. In this case, it does look like it does match up with some kind of range. So this is my higher timeframe key level number 1, and that's my higher timeframe key level number 2. And at this point, some of you might be wondering, why am I not using, for example, this high here or this low here, given that, you know, this is a much more zoomed out version of, you know, what price is currently doing at the moment? And the answer to that question is very simple. It comes back down to one word: relevance. Is this level relevant to you right now? And the simple way to answer this The next question is to look at what is your execution timeframe. I'm taking trades in this case on the 15-minute chart where I'm mostly expecting to close out my trades within a couple of days, at most a few days, but most of the time it's going to be closed within either the same day, within a couple of days. And if we look at these further out levels on Bitcoin, what do we see? This is $73K and that's $57K. This is currently at $66K right now. There is at least a $7K gap to the higher level. There's at least a $10K gap to the lower level. For Bitcoin to make a $10K move usually takes at least up to a few weeks and up to even This is not relevant at all to what we're trying to do on the 15-minute chart. So just like that, you have managed to filter out a couple of levels that are completely irrelevant to you just by using your execution timeframe. So now that we have the higher timeframe key levels, the second part to this equation is we want to determine a higher timeframe bias. And all a higher timeframe bias is, is some kind of higher timeframe direction that you think the market is going to move towards next. And before I get into how to do this, you have to understand that when it comes to a higher timeframe bias, most of it is guesswork. All you're doing is taking an educated guess on where you think the markets are going to go next. There is an art and science to this, yes, of course, but you are not going to get a 100% win rate doing this. In fact, the goal in the first place when it comes to trading should never be to get a 100% win rate. We're simply— the correct mindset that we want to have when it comes to this is to use whatever resources that we have to make the best analysis or the best judgment on what we think the market's going to do next. Whether or not we're right or wrong doesn't really matter. And as you progress in your trading journey, realize that whether you're right or wrong doesn't really affect your profitability. So don't worry about having a 100% win rate with this stuff. I'm obviously quite good at it because I've been doing this for literally years. And the more experience that you rack up in higher timeframe bias and just doing higher timeframe analyses, obviously this goes without saying, you're gonna get better at this. So going back to what we were talking about before, the way that you determine the higher timeframe bias usually is to build a narrative. This is the best way that I know how to explain this. What is some narratives or what are some stories that you can tell about what price action is doing? So let me give you an example in this case. So we can see here that let's look at the sell side first. Sell side meaning, you know, your swing lows, right? Let's look at the lower side first. When we start looking at the sell side, we can see that, okay, price seems to be, you know, at least in recent times, showing a very strong movement towards the upside. And then we can also see that this pump was started after sell side liquidity, in this case over here, was taken out, right? After this level got taken out, price actually started pumping. And you can see throughout this whole period of here that every time the market does form a new expansion, sell side liquidity does get swept for pumping. And then over here once more, sell side liquidity does get swept before pumping. And then once again over here, sell side does get swept before pumping. And this, by the way, is exactly what we're looking for when it comes to this framework. We're looking for these liquidity sweeps that match up with our higher timeframe. And this is how we're gonna be able to catch all of these high probability explosive movements, which is a very key word here because rarely do we wanna be stuck holding onto trades that are doing nothing, especially when the market is doing this. It's not a good time to be a trader and it's not a good time to be holding onto trades because you're gonna be wondering about it all the time. You're gonna be seeing other coins pump and you're gonna be like, why am I even holding onto this? Is this ever gonna go up? Is this gonna stop me out? And all in all, your capital is better allocated The trades that have explosive movements and high probability movements. Plus the fact that when you're stuck in a trade that's doing nothing, the moment you start constantly wondering about it is when you are expending a lot of mental capital, meaning mental energy, and that exhausts you for the next day or your next trading decision. If you've ever noticed that you tend to make pretty poor trading decisions after you have went through some very emotional period in your trading, maybe you've went through a very large loss or something happened in your personal life, you tend to not make as good decisions when it comes to trading. It's because you have expanded your mental capital and you're not in the optimal state for good trading decisions. So going back to what we were talking about before, if we just look at the sell side, we can see that there is probably not a very high probability that price is going to come all the way back down here, especially considering the fact that there's about a $6K gap between where price currently is and where, you know, this sell side liquidity based on our higher time frame analysis is. So now before we start being certain that this is the higher time frame bias, let's look at the buy side. We look at the buy side, obviously price is about to hit this level, so we're going to have to zoom a little bit further out. So over And if we look at price at this current level here, we can see that, okay, we have a previous high that hasn't been swept yet. So as well as the fact that there are relatively equal highs over here, which usually acts as a very strong draw on liquidity. Then we zoom further out. We can also see that there is even more buy side liquidity above. And obviously this is a bit too irrelevant to us at the moment. So for now, at least based on current state of price, the fact that we're already so close to the liquidity level, plus the liquidity level hasn't been swept yet, plus all of here like is bullish market structure leading me to believe that the higher timeframe bias is very likely towards Again, notice what I'm doing here. I'm building layers upon layers, telling a story. I'm building a narrative. And that's the best way that I can explain on how to build a higher timeframe bias. The more you do this, the better you're gonna get at it. So give this exercise a try. And the best way to practice this is to actually do this exercise on 5 to 10 different charts and then making a mental note on where you think the bias is going to be. Now, I do not mean to take any trades. Make a mental note on where you think the bias is going to go and check back in after a few days, or depending on whatever timeframe it is that you're trading on, see if you were right. Did the market go up? Did the market go down? And over time, you're gonna get a feel for how to build this narrative. One thing to keep in mind is that when you're building a narrative, it's very important that you consider both sides of the equation. You never just jump right away to a conclusion. You always, you know, look at the characters, look at the setting, storyline, whatever, before you actually, you know, build that narrative, right? Multiple ingredients need to be present when you're building a narrative. Same thing here. You need to look at both sides of the equation before you come up with that narrative. And now that you understand step 1, it's time to move into step 2. This is where we come into the lower timeframe. If you remember what we talked about before, Step two involves looking for key levels on the lower time frame for us to execute from. Because if we don't do step two, then we're not going to have a clear idea of where to even execute from in the first place, or where are the high probability areas that we can execute from. The problem with looking at the higher time frame and directly making a trade from the higher time frame is the fact that you're not going to be able to get entries that are really tight. Just to give you an example, let's assume that this was a trade that I took yesterday that gave me about three R in the span of about two hours or just under two hours. This trade, by the way, was taken using the exact framework. framework that I'm giving you right now. But let's say, for example, I did not jump into the lower timeframe, completely skipped step 2 and moved on to step 3, which is execution. Now, in the first place, I would not have seen this liquidity level over here, at least not until I zoomed into the lower timeframe. Mind you, the higher timeframe bias that we marked out beforehand was— gave us this level, this level. It did not give us that. It was only when I jumped into the lower timeframe where I actually saw it in the first place. And secondly, let's say even if hypothetically speaking, I would have seen this on the higher timeframe, there was no way that I would've placed my stop here. Like, if anything, I would've at least Considered, I don't know, like some stop that's lower, maybe this swing low, maybe at the bottom of this fair value gap or something. And just by virtue of doing that, it goes from a 2.8R trade to a 0.58R trade. That is 5 times less potential reward than you would've gotten just by not going onto the lower timeframe and executing from the smaller picture view. And this is something that a lot of people tend to struggle with. Either they go way too high to the point where it's completely irrelevant to them, or they stay way too much in the small picture without looking at the higher timeframe at all, which is why they end up getting chopped up by all these little moves, like going long, going short on all these little moves and getting chopped up. Or they just do one timeframe and just go from there. And then they struggle with their trades not being very consistent in the sense that profit targets are always gonna be different. You're probably not gonna have very high risk-to-reward trades just because you're not zooming in, getting a more refined entry. But yeah, these are all very common problems. And the way to overcome this is simply to have 2 timeframes, higher timeframe and a lower timeframe. One to determine your environment, which is what the higher timeframe was for, and one for execution. Very simple, 2 E's. You have an environment An experimental timeframe and an executional timeframe. If you have both of these, you are in the perfect sweet spot to make a lot of money trading. Now, going back to what I was talking about before, it's time to now hop into the 15-minute chart. And this is a lower timeframe. Now, specifically what you want to look for is key levels where you want to execute from. And the process is going to be roughly similar to what we did on the higher timeframe. In this case, we can see that price is trading between this high and this low, right? This low to this high, this also happens to be a range high. Price is currently just trading between these 2 levels. And so the process for marking out these key Levels super straightforward. Now here already is a mistake that I've already made, or most people would make, which is actually treating this range high here as a potential key level. Now here's the thing: I don't know if you remember during step one when we were planning out our higher time frame bias and our higher time frame levels, we've already predetermined that we think the market is going to go in that direction, which is up. Why in the world then am I marking out potential quote unquote resistance levels? Doesn't make sense. I'm not looking to short the markets. I'm not looking to take profit here. So this level doesn't really matter. And just to give you another example. Example of why marking this out is a mistake and why considering this as a potential key level is a mistake is the fact that when the market is in a buy program, these buy-side liquidity levels tend to not mean much. Now, just to give you an example, let's look at when price was over here. You can see that you have a lot of swing highs, a lot of buy-side liquidity that just get absolutely blown through without any sort of retracement. Now, in a bearish market environment, sure, this is exactly what you want to look for, which is buy-side liquidity to get swept before the market moves lower. For example, when the market was in a sell Every instant that the market took out a buy side liquidity, it went to form new lows. Again, over here, took out this buy side and that buy side, and it continued to form new lows. Similarly, over here, buy side, boom, new lows. So this is when we determine the bias. Do we— it's the downside? Only then do we consider these levels. This is honestly the easiest hack that I can give you to be trading with the trend, which is determine your bias and then completely ignore the other side of the equation. Because truth be told, it's just not going to give you any sort of good risk to reward, and it's not gonna give you a really good win rate either. Like, imagine if you tried to short every single one of these highs here. Like, sure, you might have won something by chance, but you're not gonna be very consistent with it. And more importantly, you're going to be losing much more trades than you are going to be winning, which means it's an overall losing strategy. So back to what I was talking about here before, the fact that we've already identified the higher timeframe bias to be towards the upside means we're not trying to catch all these tiny little moves down. It's one other thing you need to remember about the markets. And this is a rule, by the way. When you're in a buy program, the up moves tend to be way stronger than the down moves. You can just observe it from this recent move. move that took Bitcoin from $60K all the way up to $67K. When the market is in a buy program, the up moves tend to be a lot quicker. They tend to be a lot bigger. And the keyword here is bigger, quicker. Remember what I talked about before about not wanting to hold onto trades that are doing absolutely nothing because it saps your mental capital. It makes you wonder, it makes you doubt, and it saps off a lot of your emotional energy, which is, well, otherwise called mental capital. And you wanna preserve that mental capital. It's not something people tend to think about. Like when we think about trading, oh, you know, we wanna preserve our capital. But nobody really thinks about preserving the mental capital so that they can continue to make good quality trading decisions day after day. And this is how you do it, by taking trades that are not only high probability, but also happen quick and hit your profit target fast with certainty. That's, for those of you who have taken trades like that before, you know exactly how it feels. It feels like you're on the top of the world, that you have conquered the market and you're some kind of genius. You wanna be ideally feeling like that a lot of the time because then that feeds into your mental capital. Of course, you don't wanna take it too far and go into overconfidence and get into euphoric territory. Because that can also be a double-edged sword. But that's not something I'm going to get into in this video. Drop a comment though if you'd be interested to see any psychology-based content. That's a question that I'm genuinely curious about because it tends to not be a topic that gets a lot of views when it comes to YouTube. So anyways, now that we've discussed why you want to be trading with the trend, boom, this level goes away. We only want to look for areas to buy from. We're not looking for areas to sell from. It's buy. At least until this level is taken out, we're just looking to buy. And there are 2 ways that we can do that. One is by using a retracement, and secondly, it's going to be the liquidity sweeps. Now for the purpose of this video, I'm We're just going to focus on liquidity sweeps, but it doesn't mean that we cannot implement some retracement style strategies. Now assuming that price moved from here to here, and let's say that this is the top, right? And I'm not looking to short this down. This is another like big mistake that tends to hold a lot of beginners back. It's trying to trade retracements. I'm sure there are some of you here that might think, oh, you know, price seems to be going down at the moment, blah blah blah, let's take a short all the way down to here, right? Because that's where think the market is going to retrace to. I just want to give you an example here of taking a retracement style trade versus taking an expansion style trade. Now, what is the difference between an expansion and a retracement? The simplest way that you can differentiate the both, expansions follow the trend. Expansions would tend to be much larger in price, like magnitude of movement tends to be much larger compared to retracements. It also happens quicker than retracements. And the key thing here is retracements is retracing into some kind of area before the market expands again in the direction of the trend. And that's a very key distinction here. The fact that we've already We've already determined that the higher timeframe bias is towards the upside, means that expansions will likely happen towards the upside, means retracements will tend to take longer to happen, probably not gonna be as strong, and they're definitely not gonna be moving as much. So why trade this kind of a movement, for example, when you could, for example, trade this kind of a movement? It's twice the potential reward, right? 1.55 versus 3.14. It's probably gonna take half the time so that you don't have to expend that much mental capital, and it's gonna be way higher probability as well because it's following your bias. Makes sense? This is a very key distinction here. If you can solve this problem, it's not an exaggeration to say that you will double your profits overnight. So in this case here, we're not trying to trade this retracement. We are waiting for the markets to potentially come into this retracement zone so that we can start executing. So I want you to pay attention specifically to this 0.618 to 0.705 area. Ideally, what we want is some kind of untapped liquidity within the area to serve as an entry criteria for our liquidity sweep. Because again, following this framework, we're only looking for liquidity sweeps within the trend. And right away I can see 2 right there that lines up close to the 0.618 and directly at the 0.705. So at this point, I've already determined my key levels. So there are 3 scenarios basically. And this is a concept that I like to call thinking in bets or thinking in probabilities. See, the thing about trading is that the only thing that's certain is that the markets are never certain. So you never want to jump to a concrete conclusion and like just, okay, price will come here and then it will go up. Rarely that is the case and rarely will you be correct. Not even I'm correct on a lot of these analyses. But the thing that will truly set good traders apart from great traders is their ability to think in terms of probabilities or thinking in bets. And the key to doing that is to create multiple scenarios. Think if then statements. For the programmers who are watching this video right now, you will know exactly what I mean. But even if you're not a programmer, not a problem. I'm not a programmer either. It's basically creating scenarios of if then statements. If price were to come here, then what do you do? If price were to come here, what do you do? If price were to come here, blow through here, then what would you do? Or if price were to blow through both of these levels, then what would you do? Right? It's coming up with a plan for each one of these scenarios so that whatever happens, you are simply in a state where you are. Reading and reacting. And that is a very good place to be when it comes to trading. You're not trying to make a prediction, you're taking what the market is going to give you. Sometimes it can be really high probability setups where whatever analysis that you came up with, the market follows to a T. It just happens like boom. Sometimes it could also be more ambiguous where this type of probabilistic thinking is going to serve you a lot more compared to just having one scenario and like do or die, all in or bust. That's going to help you out way more. So in this scenario here, what I would be looking And to answer that question, if, you know, price were to come to any of these levels, then what do we do? This is where we start getting into step 3. Now that we've identified the levels that we potentially want to execute from, these are areas that might give us really high probability entries. Now, now it's time to actually define what are the execution steps. And for that, it's really simple. All you want to look for is one of these liquidity levels to get swept and then wait for some kind of displacement to happen on the 15-minute chart. To illustrate this example, I'm gonna use this trade right here that I took and was successful. Once the liquidity level has been swept, I want to see some kind of a displacement. Now displacement, all this means is that the candle, the candle, the up candle basically engulfs the candle before it. So you can see in this case that this is a down candle and you have an aggressive move, right? This is called a displacement. And the reason why this is called a displacement, back to the idea that smart money or the market makers are the ones that truly move the markets. They're the only ones who have enough capital to be able to make a splash in the markets that moves it straight up or straight down. And displacement is basically us trying to catch onto the footprints of what the smart money is doing. In fact, everything that we've done before hand, it's in line with what a market maker would look for. And all we want to see— and before we start executing, we want the market makers to tell us or to give us a clue that our analysis is indeed correct, that our bias is indeed correct, and that our liquidity level over here is indeed the correct one. The way we see that is through displacement. We want to see some kind of an aggressive move, right? Could be within a candle, it could be within a couple of candles, just some kind of aggressive move. Just, it's like a clear indication, like, okay, liquidity has been swept already. All right, it's, it's go time. And the moment that happens, you can enter anywhere along That displacement. For example, moment when this was happening, I just went in at a random point. I wasn't trying to nitpick, like try to catch a fair value gap entry. I don't have to catch the bottom. You just have to get in at some point during that displacement, all you need. And then you place your stop loss underneath the wick of the liquidity sweep, or in the event that you are trading a short, place your stop loss above the wick of the liquidity sweep. As simple as that. Now the ideal target for this would be somewhere between 5 to 10R. Honestly, a 3R trade will also work just as fine. And all of this is happening on the 15-minute chart. Just to illustrate this example, let's say price comes down over the weekend. Like, as of the, as of the time that I'm recording this, it is Friday, and the weekends are usually a time where the markets tend to retrace or just do nothing at all. And so it wouldn't be a surprise if the market were to retrace all the way back down to this level over the weekend. And if that happens, all I want to see the moment this kind of displacement happens, let's say during Monday, I can enter anywhere during the displacement. Or if you're familiar with the concept of order blocks, or if you're familiar with the concept of fair value gaps, then that is also a potential entry. You want to place your Stop loss beneath the wick low, the liquidity sweep. You want to target at least three R. That would look something like this. Ideally, should be five to ten. Three R again works perfectly fine. And this strategy, once you master this, you will have a really high win rate plus a very high level of profitability and a very high level of risk reward. Meaning this is going to become an ATM machine as long as you master this. Now, if that first trade does get taken out, for example, if we come back to that previous example here, you can see that this low, once it got swept, it actually failed, right? It actually came lower. What do you do in this point? Well. My system indicates that if the first trade does get stopped out, and as long as the trade idea is still valid, and as long as all the entry criteria still happening, meaning I'm still seeing some kind of liquidity sweep plus displacement, plus this is going to be a bit more of an advanced concept, but timing, meaning this was actually the London Open, which gave me a very strong indication that this was actually the true move compared to this one, which was during the Asia session, which tends to be a little bit less probability compared to the London Open. Again, this is more of an Balance concept, not something that I can cover in this video, but you do not need to worry about that because fact of the matter is most crypto outside of Bitcoin does not really follow these, you know, traditional finance market open timings. So once that happened, boom, second trade, same style of risk management, which is 1% of the account. I didn't take this trade by the way, but if I did, I would've more than recovered that loss over there and in very quick action. And there's that 3-step framework that you can start practicing and using. Just a little note on execution style. Earlier on when I was talking about waiting for displacement to happen before entering. That is not a— well, there are 2 ways that you can look at this. Even within the context of the notion itself, there is the active approach where we wait for the displacement to happen, but the passive approach works almost just as well when it comes to framework number 2 because you can literally just set a limit. So the way that works is you literally just place an order at the 705 and then stop loss, you know, wherever the wick began, and then the TP is, you know, Either the high 0.5 or further. This will pretty much always guarantee you, like always, at least almost 3R if you were to do this right. So at the low, and then if we expand this to the negative 0.5, sorry, my mistake. This will almost all— this will always guarantee you a 4R trade. And even if you were to take it at the high, it would at least be a 2.3. So depending on how you take profit, then you know you can do the math. But guys, half the time if I happen to be looking at the chart, then yeah, I'll use the active approach. But if I'm not. Guys, this framework number 2, the magic in framework number 2 is that this is the best way for you to trade passively because as long as you get the higher timeframe bias right, and as long as the target hasn't been hit yet, it's pretty much automatic when you just place an order at the 705 and like just let it run. You know, stop loss usually is pretty safe. Now you can play around with the stop loss, meaning you don't have to set it at the low. Sometimes, for example, within the context here, you can see that the price comes nowhere close to— it just hits the 705 and, you know, like it goes nowhere close to the take, for example. So in cases like this, you can definitely play around with the stop loss, maybe do something like this, and automatically this will increase your profitability by almost double, right? It went from 4R up to 7R. And feel free to play around with this. I felt like I needed to make this because otherwise you may get confused into thinking that the only approach to do framework number 2 is the active approach, when in reality the passive approach works really, really well, and it allows you to literally just hop on to the chart, set your alerts, set your orders, and like move on with your day. And you might come back overnight or at the end of your day and realize like, wow, you just made 3x, for example. So yeah, hope this video was helpful. And yeah, I'll see you guys in the next one. Cheers.
