The friction between vision and execution is gone #AI #future #transformation

I kind of wanted to stress test that idea or see if that idea was corroborated by data. Had anyone else been kind of thinking along these lines? Was established an established concept or was I genuinely doing any sort of original thinking here? And it just would've been so helpful to have some sort of a companion with the smartest AI has absolutely compressed the distance between something that's going, that's rattling around in your head and its creation, its existence in the world. And I think that is so valuable to us. To be able to have technology that can, you know, help us. It's like taking a block of raw marble and instead of having to chisel it, you have, you know, a bunch of robotic arms that come in and are like working together to hone this piece of marble into something that you had in your head that would've, you know, if you were manually chipping away at it, it would take you weeks to create your final work when instead, you know, it can be completed in minutes. I think that's what we gain is a lot of efficiency and a lot of a much quicker path between between our thoughts and the execution of those thoughts. I think there is an inherent danger, particularly for people for whom critical thinking isn't necessarily a strong suit to begin with. People talk all the time about how a lot of these models tend to have sycophantic tendencies where they're just kind of reaffirming the mental framework that you have in place. A lot of people, metacognitive type of thinking where you're constantly evaluating your own thoughts, like justified in believing this? Is this something that's real, or is it just a perception that I'm having that isn't based on facts or data? I don't like making assumptions about things. If I don't know something, and I don't know a lot, I'm very comfortable with saying, I don't know. I don't know.