Light As Medicine, Metabolic Typing, COVID Controversies, Polar Bear Fitness, Healing Yourself With Laughter & More With Life Network Expert Dr. Leland Stillman

Today's podcast replay features Life Network expert Dr. Leland Stillman as we dive deep into light, air, water, EMFs, and why your environment and nutrition matter more than you think. From cold thermogenesis and circadian lighting to breathwork and nutrition, there's a big wide-ranging practical discussion for anyone serious about their long-term health. Full show notes are at bengreenfieldlife.com/LN, Leland as in Life Network Leland, L-E-L-A-N-D. AND for more about all of our Life Network experts, you can also visit joinlifenetwork.com. Let's jump in. Leland, that's an interesting name. What's the background of that name, by the way?

Funny you should ask. So my great-great-grandfather was named Jacob Davis Babcock Stillman Jr., and he was a physician in California. He was the physician to Governor Leland Stanford Senior governor of California in the 1800s, drove the Golden Spike in at Promontory Point in Utah, which united the East and West Coast by railroad. Anyway, he had a son who unfortunately died in his teenage years of a spontaneous bacterial infection while he was traveling the world. My great-great-grandfather, J.D.B. S., as we call him, named his son Leland in honor of Governor Stanford, and so that's how the name got passed down through the family.

Okay, interesting. Wow, that's quite the genealogy. And where do you actually practice right now?

99% virtually. My practice is in Richmond, Virginia, but last September, RFK Jr. posted a video of me talking about lockdowns and COVID-19, and that went viral, and then that gave me a lot of people coming in looking for help virtually, and since then, I've been very busy taking care of people all over the country, and I also collaborate with a physician, Dr. Roxana Namovar in New York City. She has a practice called Pretty Healthy, and right now we're collaborating to come up with some pretty exciting stuff. And my clinical mentor, Dr. Anthony Beck, you've interviewed in the past.

So Anthony Beck, that's super interesting. And you said, you said somebody actually announced that you had some kind of like video go viral on COVID.

Right. So I was at a, a protest in Richmond, Virginia against mandatory vaccination. And so the background, for people who don't know, is that in Virginia, the executive order governing COVID restrictions includes a clause that allows the governor to force vaccinate everyone in the state or give them a Class 1 misdemeanor. And they're floating the idea repeatedly of mandatory vaccination, which really upsets a lot of people for obvious reasons. As your listeners may be aware, there's, you know, links to aborted fetal stem cells in the vaccine. There's a lot of people who are concerned about safety, et cetera, et cetera. I said, I don't think this is ethical and I don't think we should do this. And what I said there went viral through a website called LifeSite News.

And so, so that kind of blew you into the limelight. Do you get a lot of phone calls from people then if you're operating virtually who— because I get asked this all the time— are saying, and we might be opening up a can of worms here early on in our podcast, don't get me canceled, dude, by the way, who are saying, well, like, Leland, are you going to get vaccinated?

I'm not going to get vaccinated.

Okay. And, and is that because you just don't believe vaccinations in general are, are the right way to trigger immunity, or is it because this particular vaccine is problematic for you?

Wow, we could talk about this all the whole episode.

Oh gosh, I just opened up a can of worms. I didn't even— well, you opened up the can of worms by bringing up the RFK issue and getting this video going live. But you know, we might as well talk about it, uh, since we can talk about anything on this show. And just to really give you background on that, I personally am not 100% opposed to the idea of vaccination, but as you just alluded to, everything from aborted stem cell lines to a lot of the adjuvants to the fact that I don't think this is technically even a vaccine, it's more like an mRNA modification. Dictate me being pretty nervous about this particular vaccination, but I'm just curious what you kind of, you know, are doing for yourself personally.

Doing for myself as far as why I am not interested in getting vaccinated or doing for myself to maintain optimal health and fitness to resist the virus?

Both. We got time.

Okay, cool. So as far as the science behind the vaccine, you know, we've— the history of medical science is so fraught with people getting burned. By ideas they thought were good and were sure were safe, right? I mean, how many times has the FDA approved drugs that later got taken off the market completely because they were too dangerous? And every time the same thing happens. The experts in the white coats get up on TV and say, "This thing is awesome. It's going to make your lives better. It's totally worth the risks and benefits." And then it rolls out and it kills a bunch of people. Finally, the safety data piles up that it's not safe and it gets pulled from the market. I haven't studied the detail on adverse reactions to this vaccine in the detail I would like to come out and say, "I'm sure this thing is not worth the risk or benefit," but there's always been a fundamental ethical principle of medicine where we don't force people to do things because we don't always know what the risks and benefits are. And so people say— like to say that vaccines are safe and effective, and I like to say that my car is safe and effective, but I can still die in a car crash., and people will still die of vaccines. There is no medical therapy or intervention on planet Earth in the history of the world that has been completely without risk, and if you don't have a clear explanation of what the risk is, you have no business forcing people to accept it. And the whole premise of we have to vaccinate to protect people, well, who are we protecting? Most of the people, the overwhelming majority in fact, who've died have made choices that made them susceptible to illness that led to organ dysfunction that predisposed them to not have really the physiologic reserve to survive a viral illness.

Or they lived in an environmental situation that could aggravate it as well, you know, which I actually talked with Dr. Zach Bush about, you know, areas that are rife with, you know, whatever, glyphosate, herbicide, pesticide, poor air quality. And I guess if you want to get into a book like The Invisible Rainbow, even high, high amounts of EMF all could produce or at least aggravate the inflammatory firestorm brought on by COVID or the susceptibility for it to become more problematic.

Exactly. And I put out a video on exactly that theory that non-native EMF could drive inflammatory cascades yielding cytokine storms last spring. It got the most views of any video I've ever gotten. It went very far on social media. It got, it got taken down.

Yeah, I was gonna say, how can you even still be on YouTube with videos like that?

So what I did just last week, there's a paper that's in preprint, hasn't been accepted, hasn't completed the peer review process, by a PhD biophysicist named Beverly Rubik and an MD who's a radiologist named Robert Brown, and it's called, you know, I'm going to paraphrase here, but COVID-19 and exposure to wireless radiation. And the question they're really asking in this paper is, given the temporal and geographic association between the 5G rollout and the severity of deaths that are attributed to COVID-19, is there a relationship to increasing density of non-native EMF driving morbidity and mortality. And we went for an hour, an hour or more, talking about the ins and outs of the science here and really what people need to know about whether or not this is a clear and present danger to their health and if there's truly a link to COVID-19. Again, not implying causation. I don't think COVID-19 is created by non-native EMF, but, you know, you can't tell me that people who are being baked by microwave radiation at a level you usually only find inside your microwave are not going to be negatively affected by it in some way.

Yeah. Well, I mean, and even if COVID didn't even exist, we could be having this conversation about the general health of high exposure to those type of things anyways. I know you're in your office right now recording with me, but do you use a lot of EMF mitigation tactics in your own office, or is that something you encourage your patients to do?

The whole house is hardwired, aluminum siding, concrete foundation, Very low EMF levels here.

Nice. Have you looked into biogeometry or anything along those lines as far as some of these more fringe methods of quelling EMF? And I ask this because I just had a 2-hour discussion with Paul Chek that I released about these Egyptian biogeometry concepts and have a team coming to my house in June to kind of implement a few of those tactics.

I am going to fall down that rabbit hole at a future date.

Okay, got it. What about Faraday? You sleeping in a Faraday cage right now, Faraday canopy?

Right now, the levels in my bedroom are not bad enough for me to bother with it, but it's a canopy that's underneath my bed and I'm ready to set it up whenever I feel like it.

Okay, got it. Yeah, we literally just got done tearing the fan down from our ceiling and we have our canopy coming in a couple of weeks. It took me a long time to convince my wife and she had to design the whole canopy herself and didn't want to ruin the feng shui of the bedroom, but we're going to be sleeping in an extremely protected environment now. And even though we don't have a ton of cell phone towers and radio waves bombarding bottling our house 24/7. I had a guy named Brian Hoyer from Shielded Healing come through and do an analysis, and there was enough going on during the night of sleep to where I'm like, you know what, those 8 hours for every 24-hour cycle that I want my nervous system to repair, get recovery, be disconnected from anything whatsoever, kind of makes sense to just sleep in a, in a cage.

So amen to that.

So anyways, back, back to COVID. Um, you know, we, we could, as you alluded to, um, talk about a lot of the controversial aspects of it until we're blue in the face, which I think many, many others are already doing. It almost becomes a bit of an echo chamber, it seems, to a certain extent. But what I like to focus on are solutions. And so obviously, if, if you're not going to get vaccinated, or that's not something you're encouraging your patients to do, with your background in, uh, immunology and the immune system— and correct me if I'm wrong, you actually have a particular interest in that, right?

I do.

Yeah. What, what, what are some of the, the key things that you're doing when it comes to either people who, who get COVID or COVID prevention, or even, you know, like addressing something like long-haul COVID, which seems to be an issue these days?

Right. So number one, I— and let's start with just some basics of virology that I think are forgotten and that I think are really informative for how we look at how to prevent and mitigate the effects of these diseases. So when they had the 1918 flu going around in 1918, they tried to get people with the virus to infect people who didn't have the virus, and what they were shocked to find is they couldn't infect everybody. And everybody's experienced this, like one person gets flu in the family, somebody else comes down a couple days later, but a bunch of family members don't get the flu. So what's that about? And when you talk to people who get the flu routinely, who are constantly sick, who have some diagnosis like chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia or whatever, they'll tell you that they get sick periodically and have these kind of windows of, "Well, I feel a little bit better in between these episodes." When it's really bad, they're just chronically sick. They're just always that— feel that poorly. I can't tell you the last time that I got sick. And when you talk to people who really get their diet, lifestyle, environment, mindset, which is the whole Balance Protocol framework that that I use now that I'm training with Dr. Beck, you dial in everything so that people are as close to bulletproof as possible. I'm a little bit jealous of Dave Asprey for seizing on that in his marketing materials because it's basically what I wanna do with my patients.

I was gonna say, aren't you supposed to say TM now when you say that word?

I hope not, right? So I look at the environment in totality and that's where my background in environmental health, and I'm glad you brought that up, is so important because what I found when I was going through my undergraduate training was I was looking at the environment as a whole. Well, what are all the different factors that determine whether or not somebody gets sick? And the more I studied this, the more I became convinced that there was no element of the environment, no matter how microscopic or undetectable or small, that didn't have some effect on human health. And the rest of the story is really dialing in, well, how big of a deal is that, right? I have patients who can barely use a cell phone because they're so electrosensitive. I have other patients who have no sensitivity to it. They've all got different biochemistry underlying that. One of the things I've found, since we're on the topic, in people who are electrochemically— or electro— electrosensitive, or who perceive a lot— have a lot of issues with sensitivity to things like smells in their environment, is they have nutritional imbalances underlying that.

Or if I could throw in there, it's something I've noticed is high metal accumulation, like high levels of mercury, lead, aluminum, which sounds silly, but it actually seems to turn people into a little bit more of an antenna for this electrohypersensitivity. And the other one that I've noticed is a lot of people who have poor genetic methylation patterns also seem to be somewhat susceptible to this as well. And I, I've, I've seen a lot of people who will have like either some stealth infection like, you know, Lyme or mold or mycotoxin, some type of metal accumulation, uh, poor methylation status. And it seems like electrohypersensitivity kind of like is the fourth leg of that stool over and over again. I tend to see it on a lot of folks.

That is a very astute observation that is totally lost on most people in the health and wellness space, which is one reason why people listen to you. And the reality— and I became convinced of this after seeing so many patients. And my first job out of training was with this doctor named Rick Spinogel in Tampa, Florida who ran a Lyme mold clinic where we did a lot of IV therapy. And this is far more intensive than anything that people are getting from their average neighborhood wellness doctor. And I've never spoken about this publicly. And he's very, let's just say, secretive about what he does. I won't give away any of his trade secrets on this show, but the bottom line is this. He hit people with amazing amounts of IV nutrition based on very sophisticated lab testing. I saw people go from unable to function, get out of bed, and he's documented all this. People who doubt me, go to his testimonials page. You'll see photos and videos of people before and after, basically unable to function beforehand and then in the pink of health after. And I was, I was, I was amazed by what he was doing and I was obsessed with figuring out, well, why does this work? But then when I got down there, I started to see that a lot of patients didn't respond and didn't improve. And it doesn't matter if you're talking about Dr. Spinalgal or Dietrich Klinghardt or, you know, the St. George Clinic in Germany. And as a result of taking care of these patients, I met people who'd been to all these clinics and done all these incredibly extreme things in order to try and reclaim their health. And what I became convinced of is when they were failing, they weren't addressing all aspects of the environment. And that's when I became fascinated by light because one of these patients turned me on to the work of Dr. Jack Kruse, another very controversial figure. And then I got into his work and got obsessed with light and then I started to see that it wasn't everything to my patients and that's when I found Dr. Beck and he showed me really where the rubber meets the road of light meeting biochemistry and now I have a very integrated approach which is— approach is— which is what Balance Protocol is and I'm very happy with with the results. Your observation of heavy metals as basically getting out of control in people who have electrochemical sensitivity, definitely have seen that.

So, for you, if I could paint with a broad brush, a big part of what you do comes down to optimizing a patient's not just their internal environment but something that a lot of doctors don't do, their external environment.

Exactly.

Okay. All right. With phototherapy or photobiomodulation or light exposure being one component of that. Right.

Okay.

Exactly. Yeah. All right. So, so, you know, when it comes to COVID, obviously, you know, cleaning up air pollution, you know, not consuming a high amount of herbicides, pesticides, glyphosate, shopping organic, choosing food correctly, positive emotions, you know, cleaning up metals or other stealth infections, you know, all those things that might relate to both internal and external environment are what would all be important, I would imagine, in your approach. But I'd like to, to hone in on, on light for a little bit since you, you really seem to prioritize that as one of the main things that you mentioned. What does that look like exactly in terms of when a patient comes to you, what type of questions you're asking, or what you're doing to optimize specifically the lighting environment or the use of light to optimize one's biology?

So first of all, I try to quantify what their light environment is to the best of my ability. Most people have never bothered to do this, and one of the things I like to tell my patients to do is get on your smartphone, download an app that measures the light in your environment, and just see how much light you're exposed to. People are shocked to realize that outside in the sun, even in the dark, even on a cloudy winter day, there's thousands, sometimes more light in the external environment outside their home than there is in their home office. And so we've got these diagnoses of seasonal affective disorder. Well, what is that except sunlight deficiency? And I start to ask them about, well, what kind of glasses are you wearing? Are you wearing contacts? Do you wear sunglasses? Because people don't realize, right, if seasonal affective disorder is a disease in which your mood and energy levels decline because you have low levels of neurotransmitters and hormones because of a lack of a light stimulus, then what are sunglasses but a great way to induce seasonal affective disorder?

Yeah, it's a good, it's a good point. You know, I've, I've always— well, not always, but for the longest time— just kind of eschewed sunglasses based on the idea that the lack of exposure of the retina to adequate amounts of UVA, UVB, and infrared could downregulate some of the melanin production in the skin and render one more susceptible to sunburn or less able to harness vitamin D from sunlight. But what you're saying is it goes even beyond that and could even affect emotions and induce seasonal affective disorder, et cetera, if one is constantly in a low-light environment or wearing sunglasses regularly.

Exactly. And there's a really wonderful paper on this that we should post in the show notes called "Melatonin and the Optics of the Human Body" that basically blow this whole paradigm up for people so they really understand how melatonin is working in their bodies, melatonin being, of course, the hormone of light. Because, you know, when you're— what people don't realize about light and biology is that you need bright light during the day. This is the stimulus for your hormones and neurotransmitters to be produced, including melatonin. And melatonin controls all those other hormones and neurotransmitters because of its interactions as the main timekeeper of the, uh, of your circadian, uh, rhythms, right? And so if you don't get bright light during the day, you're not going to have optimal melatonin levels, you're not going to have high neurotransmitter and hormone levels, and this is associated with premature aging. Then at night, if you've got excess blue and green light in the environment, you delay the melatonin release from your tissues. What it's supposed to do in nature is come out into your bloodstream and run around the body turning on rest, regeneration, repair programs. And when when you're constantly bombarded with artificial light as we are in our artificially lit world and you already have deficient melatonin because you don't have the right frequencies in your life, i.e., infrared, red, and to a certain extent visible light, you're setting yourself up for a total body lifelong deficiency of melatonin, which explained to me finally when I put all those pieces of that puzzle together. And that right there in less than a minute is like 3 or 4 years of reading in the photobiomodulation and circadian biology literature. When I put that together, it finally made sense why I had these patients who could take bottle after bottle of glutathione and B vitamins and whatever and do ozone and sauna and blah, blah, blah and still not get better.

Yeah. And it's interesting too. I think a lot of people don't realize that despite the fact that a lot of these light boxes that you'll put on your desk for seasonal affective disorder or the one for the ears, the Human Charger, or there's a pair of glasses I have called the Re-Timers, that also work well for this. Those are useful for, I think, some of the seasonal affective disorder and also some of the circadian rhythm alignment, uh, advantages you can get from blasting yourself with light during the day if you're in a low-light environment. But many of them do not emit any near-infrared photons, and the near-infrared photons are what stimulate antioxidant production. Like, like, that's, that's what causes the production of subcellular melatonin. Which is going to act as one of your body's primary antioxidants, supplying you with this antioxidant reservoir that will enhance your ability to be able to quench free radicals and things along those lines. And so, even if you're using these light boxes or surrounding yourself with these type of biohacks, so to speak, in your internal environment, say like in your home or in your office, if you're not also introducing either sunlight or some form of near-infrared into that scenario, you're actually missing out on a lot of the antioxidant benefits of light.

You are exactly correct. And your understanding of light is far more sophisticated than pretty much any clinician that I speak to on a regular basis. When I explain to people how melatonin works in the human body, it's— and this is what you only get this when you start to read the papers on how melatonin is produced, why it's produced, where it's produced, when it's produced, all this stuff, right? I now look at melatonin, you know, in the body and its role the same way I look at water in your house. You could live with very little water consumption, but you would be miserable. You would smell bad. Let's not even go there. But when you use water in your home, you don't turn on the kitchen sink to take a shower in your bathroom. Just like you don't turn on the sink in your bathroom at the same time of day maybe that you use the— You use water in discrete finite quantities in different parts of your home in different quantities at different times of day, and melatonin is the exact same way. So when people come to me and say, "Oh, my melatonin level's high," and I see sky-high melatonin levels levels all the time and people who are quite ill. And what they're trying to do is basically say, all right, I'm going to turn on my garden hose and shoot it through the front door to do the dishes.

Yeah, that makes sense. Now, now, in terms of melatonin, do you also encourage supplementation of melatonin, like in the evening especially? You know, I— it's a recommendation I made in the past to aging individuals who produce a little less melatonin as they age anyways. You know, people who are like, I'm getting older, my sleep seems to be declining, their sleep habits haven't changed. Small doses of melatonin seem effective, but I'm curious your take on that as a physician.

So number one, I want to always copy nature. And, you know, Hippocrates said the greatest medicine of all is teaching people how not to need it. And over and over in my career, I've seen people go down this road of let's circumvent what the body is supposed to do and do it a different way. That always ends with people figuring out why nature did it the way nature did it. And so it's not necessarily the wrong answer, and I do use melatonin therapeutically in certain contexts, but the number one thing I want to do with my patients is get them into a light environment where I know they're getting adequate red and infrared light, usually from a photobiomodulation device or light panel or sunlight if they're in the right— at the right latitude and they can withstand strong UV light that may obviously give them sunburn. People should not sunburn. That is true. And then, I want them to be in a naturally lit environment at night. And when I say naturally lit, I mean warmly lit with minimal blue and green light so that it won't shut down their melatonin rhythms. And then I want to make sure that they're not being exposed to anything that's going to really suck up that melatonin in an unnatural way. I see abnormal labs in people who are vaping, who are using ozone generators for air purification that will create drag on their melatonin system in an abnormal demand. And so you got to really go through everything. I mean, I'm asking patients, "What's your air handler like? What's in there? How does it work?" Oh, you've got an ozone— generator in your HVAC unit. Well, maybe this is why your lipid peroxides are high and that's linked to heart disease and neurodegeneration and metabolic syndrome and whatever. And I get people to unplug these things and stop using things that make them sick and they just get better on their own. Once I've optimized the environment, that's when we can start to talk about supplementing. But then you gotta get into, well, wait a minute, why is your melatonin low? Do you have enough tryptophan? Have you got enough B6? Is there enough magnesium? Because you need all these cofactors and raw materials in order to make the melatonin in the first place.

Well, hello. I want to interrupt today's show to tell you about what I would consider to be the funnest, most helpful water, kind of like water biohacking website that exists. It's called Water and Wellness. I've interviewed the guy who runs the website, Robert Slovak, who I consider to be one of the world's leading experts on water. And he's got everything from hydrogen water tablets to the best water filters to ways that you can take purified water and optimally remineralize it to to the, um, the, the Quinton formula, which is basically very much like human plasma when you drink it, you know, like coconut water on steroids. They've got everything over there. And what they have is their AquaTru bundle, which gives you their AquaTru countertop reverse osmosis water filter, uh, gets you $100 off an AquaTru and a 30-day supply of their Quinton minerals, the same ones I use. That's a savings of $144 if you go to waterandwellness.com/Greenfield. And you use code GREENFIELD. If you just want the Keenton and not the water filter, they'll give you a 3-month supply for the cost of only 2 months, which saves you almost $50. For that same code, code GREENFIELD at waterandwellness.com/Greenfield. So if you're looking for some cool stuff to upgrade your hydration experience, Water and Wellness is the place to go. And then finally, I also want to give you a discount on something I've been using almost every day, and that's bee pollen. Now, this company Beekeepers Naturals, they harvest a ton of different things from the bees, from their honey to their royal jelly to their propolis. But the bee pollen, I love it. I put it on smoothies, I put it on salads, I put it on casseroles. I use it almost the same way I use salt, but it's just chock-full of not only all these free-formed amino acids but a ton of stuff that boosts your immune system and gives you clean energy with not many calories at all. You've probably had bee pollen before, like maybe on smoothies at a juice bar, but man, just having a few bottles of this stuff in your fridge is amazing. I I put on everything. And I'll even like put a little spoonful in my mouth before I go to bed at night if I've still got the munchies. And it just— it craves your appetite as well. So 15% off of any of the products, including that bee pollen I just told you about, at beekeepersnaturals.com/Ben. That's B-E-E-K-E-E-P-E-R-S naturals, N-A-T-U-R-A-L-S.com/Ben. beekeepersnaturals.com/Ben will get you 15% off of any of the Fine Bee products. From Beekeepers Naturals. All right, let's go talk to Leland again. Yeah, and, and melatonin is interesting. I mean, just because a lot of people don't realize that it can, with regular high dosages, be problematic in some people. Like, I've seen some evidence that it might increase light-induced damage to retinal photoreceptors. It can actually be something that can downregulate fertility in women, etc. Yet, at the same time, it's a pretty potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory. It's something that I'll use in higher dosages when I'm traveling, for example, or like I mentioned, recommend to aging people to use in smaller like 0.3 to 3-milligram dosages just for regular sleep enhancement. But, I've also, and I have zero— well, I shouldn't say zero data, but I've talked quite a bit with a physician in Sarasota named Dr. John Laurence about this. So-called melatonin reset, meaning using high-dose melatonin in people who have severe sleep architecture issues and insomnia to almost like reboot the system and retrain the body how to, how to sleep. And in that case, like, it's 100 to 300 mgs of melatonin, usually suppository or liposomal base, for about a month. And then, and then you, you bleed off those dosages, you lower the dosages back down, get a person down to like 0.3 to 3 or even none But this idea of a short-term, high-dosage melatonin use actually seems to do a really good job, at least in the people I've recommended it to, with almost like resetting sleep architecture, getting them to the point where they can get a solid 7 to 8 hours again. And then they kind of wean themselves off those higher dosages. Have you ever experimented much with like super high-dose melatonin as almost like a circadian reset?

I've not ever had to do that with a patient. I've always been able to get their sleep back to optimal with what I do with light environment and other things in the environment to help them sleep. But the whole concept makes so much sense and, you know, it goes back to this guiding principle in my practice which is where, you know, I used to look at things as good and bad and so many people end up falling into this myopic way of thinking about things. They're like, "Oh, well, Dr. Stillman said exogenous melatonin is bad." Well, hang on a minute. Dr. Stillman said that you're supposed to get it from light based on the nutrients in your diet and et cetera, et cetera, right? This is a tool just like sunglasses. We jumped on sunglasses earlier, but what's funny is that the use of eyewear for humanity has always been a tool to improve our performance, right? Try and survive in the wild if you've got out-of-control astigmatism and terrible nearsightedness. You're not going to be bringing down the elk at like 100 yards with your longbow, are you? And so, we've got to look at everything we've got in our environment, whether it's a supplement coming off of a shelf or it's a light that you're flipping a switch on as a tool to achieve optimal. And, that is what I love doing in my practice with my patients.

It's interesting. It's also interesting how it's kind of yoked to temperature to a certain extent. Um, one of my friends, Dr. Andrew Huberman at Stanford, he actually has this concept of the temperature minimum that occurs about 2 hours before you tend to wake up. You know, like let's say you're a 7 AM riser, your temperature minimum usually— and you could measure this even with like a, uh, you know, wearable like a, like an Oura Ring or something, kind of see what your body temp is doing during your night of sleep. But if you can identify where that temperature minimum occurs, you can actually expose yourself to low levels of temperature like cold, for example, and it shifts that temperature minimum forward. If you— if say you're someone who wants to begin staying up later and getting up slightly later because it annoys you that you keep waking up at 4 AM, you can actually get exposed to cold, uh, or I'm sorry, I'm, uh, I'm reversing that. You get exposed to light during some point at that temperature minimum and it somehow shifts the circadian clock forward because it's telling your, your temperature minimum to occur at a later point in the morning. And so he's got some interesting theories on using temperature minimum combined with light to actually reset the circadian rhythm.

That is fascinating. Yeah, and all— it's all, it's all tools in the toolbox. And what do you really want therapeutically for the patient? But it all goes back to, you know, don't try to reinvent nature, because if, you know, it can become a tool, but it can also become a liability.

Yeah, and what's the light meter, by the way, that you mentioned that you'll recommend to people to analyze light in their personal environment? Is that like an app?

Yeah, I'm using, I can't remember what it's called, but if you just put in light meter on the App Store or the Play Store if you're using Android like me, it'll come up. I'm using an app called Lux on my Android.

Okay, these are the same type of apps that like a photographer would use to analyze light prior to photography, right? Yes. Okay.

And of course I have the sophisticated light meter that actually gives me the actual readout and spectral analysis, which is a lot more money that usually only photographers have. And like you said before, I mean, it's amazing to measure LED lights and see that they're not producing hardly any red, let alone any infrared. And this whole visible-only light, as it's called, VOL lighting, is I think a disaster. It's why I wrote this blog post called "Indoor Lighting Causes More Skin Cancer Than the Sun," because when you look at this data, it's very concerning that we're irradiating ourselves constantly with visible light only without the balance of near-infrared light that stimulates melatonin production that is an anti-cancer agent.

Yeah, yeah. And, and the, um, the other interesting thing about this is you could pair it with something like a— I think it's called a D-Minder app. You could also see when sunlight exposure is going to get you adequate amounts of vitamin D, which I also think is kind of a handy little tool. And obviously we're talking about the use of, you know, some of these photobiomodulation devices, you know, like you mentioned, light panels, you know. And I certainly use one called a a juve, and I also have a sauna, you know, like a full-spectrum sauna. But I, I still believe that, you know, getting that balance of UVA and UVB during the day along with the full spectrum from sunlight is important. And you just alluded to something interesting, this idea of LED or modern fluorescent lighting, which so many people's homes are actually lit with. Um, I, I'm curious what you use in your home. I'm, I personally am a fan of the full-spectrum incandescent and then actually I'm using red incandescent in all the bedrooms and the master bathroom. But do you have a particular light bulb that you, that you tend to, uh, recommend people switch to when it comes to getting off of LED and fluorescent lighting in the home?

Yes, but what I always counsel my patients is these are tools, and so we got to figure out what your goal is. If somebody comes to me and is, say, a young, healthy 20-something-year-old who really has sleep problems, I'll say, look, you got good eyesight, you've, you're you've got good dexterity, use a red headlamp when you wake up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom, navigate your house. Make sure you got blackout curtains on. That's the only light you should be using in the hours before bed and then if you wake up in the middle of the night because it's really going to reduce the amount of circadian disruption you see. Because, you know, what's amazing when you go into the literature is you'll find all these weird results. Like, you'll find papers where, you know, 98% of people didn't have a chronodisruption due to exposure to red light at night, but 2 people did. Well, what's wrong with them? I have no idea. I haven't done their genetic analysis. It must be a genetic thing, right? So we have all these interesting, you know, personal factors that come into play. And when I got into this with patients, there became so many other factors that were important, right? Example, my mother is 76 years old. She's not that steady on her feet. She has osteoporosis. I don't want her to break a hip in the middle of the night because her son told her to navigate to the bathroom with a red headlamp. This kind of detail kind of sounds pedantic, but it's important because I do counsel a lot of older patients. And so I said, "Mom, I want you to use the Hyuuga LED lighting. I've tested it. It's very, very low, if any, green emission." And it's also— people got to remember right now we're using recessed lighting, so the light bulb sockets are not always built for the high wattage and heat production of an incandescent. You could easily start a fire in your house if you use the wrong bulb in the— or the right bulb in the wrong socket. So I told her, I tell her and my patients to use those at night if they're worried about obviously their ability to navigate at night. And then it also comes back to, you know, what's your goal? Because the reality is if somebody goes outside at night with their friends and they're out and they're partying and they want to have a good time, but they're wearing their BlueBlockers, they're gonna slow down, fall asleep, and be boring. And if they want to have a good time, well, you know, they can decide to burn that candle at both ends that night to have a good time. And it all becomes what it's worth to them, right? Because you can't go to some high-performing Fortune 500 CEO and say, "Hey, listen. It's time for you to sleep with the rhythms of nature and for you to go to sleep at 7 o'clock at night in the winter because that's what is normal for your circadian biology at your latitude in the winter." They say, "No thanks. I need you to come up with a solution that allows me to still get quality sleep but that still allows me to work into the evening as I have to in order to do my job." Right.

Yeah, I've seen those Hugo lamps before on Amazon. Those are the dimmable LED lamps that don't produce a lot of the blue light.

Right. And then, the other lights that I use are incandescents that are 2,100 to 2,300 Kelvin, very, very warm, very amber.

Yeah, that's very, very similar to what we have in most of the cans in our house. My only concern about even the dimmable LED is that the trade-off is anything dimmable or any of those type of devices, they, they tend to produce a larger amount of EMF. And so having them plugged into like a dirty EMF filter, or at least, you know, making sure that they're unplugged or off, you know, during sleep, etc., is something you should be aware of. Because any light dimmer is going to kick off a little bit more EMF. At least that's, that's what, what we found when we went through and tested my house. And there were a few, a few dimmer-style switches in the house, and those, those were the areas the highest EMF was where those dimmers were located.

That's right. And that's why you've got to test your EMF environment, because if you're just paying attention to your visible light, you can create some really significant hazards with electromagnetic and RF radiation in your home and not even realize it.

Awesome. Well, I want to talk about a few other things. You, uh, for some time when I was, when I was stalking you and preparing for this interview, I noticed that you had a program called like a Polar Bear Fitness or a Polar Bear Program for optimizing health that seems to have since been discontinued, but I would imagine some of the practices within that would still be something that you're using or recommending. And I'm curious what exactly that whole Polar Bear Program was.

Yeah, so when I first found Dr. Cruz's work on light, I became totally fascinated, dove in, read a lot of his blogs, listened to a lot of his podcasts. And he said something that really struck me, and I like controversial people of really extreme opinions because it's just— it tests your own hypotheses in a in a really powerful way. I think you do too. But anyway, he said, "Eat like a shark, live like a polar bear." And what he's alluding to is there's this really strong literature in longevity science that if you're, that like for example, the longest living mammal on planet Earth is the bowhead whale that lives in the Arctic waters. And the longest living vertebrate is the Greenland shark. These are animals that live at a very low temperature, imbibing a very small amount of oxygen periodically, right? This is why I get into like breath holding and breathwork with patients to optimize oxygen physiology and, and really oxygen delivery around their body. Freediving is actually one of my passions. I love freediving. Therapeutically as well. Yeah, it's a really powerful therapeutic tool. Yeah. And so that's part of it. And then I got into the cold exposure literature, which shows that there's a longevity benefit and potentially all kinds of other benefits like anti-cancer benefits from cold exposure. And so I put together a course called Polar Bear Fitness because in my experience at the time, what people were missing from the health and wellness dialogue was really a robust understanding of circadian physiology, which we've really gone over in a fair amount of detail today. And so I basically used the polar bear as a teaching example because it's the mammal with the— that lives at the highest latitude that's very closely related to us, at least as far as being an omnivorous mammal that lives on land eats a very indiscriminate diet. And so I used it as an example of what happens to human physiology in extreme light environments. When, you know, you put a human being in a very long light cycle artificially, i.e., you use a lot of artificial light at night, what do people do on a population level? They tend to eat a lot of food that's high in carbohydrates and they gain a lot of weight and they don't sleep well and they get diabetes and all this other stuff. When you look at polar bears and other animals at high latitudes and live in cold environments, they have many of the same metabolic abnormalities as humans who eat too much carbohydrate. And those metabolic abnormalities are actually adaptations that allow them to survive cold freezing temperatures in the winter. Because the polar bear has to gain, I think it's like 100% of its body weight every summer in order to then burn that fat off and survive in the Arctic winter. Because if the polar bear doesn't gain that weight, the polar bear freezes to death. So I basically just taught all the principles of circadian biology that I was learning as well as teaching people cold exposure and cold therapy. I discontinued the program when I found out about "Bounce Protocol" and I saw my own labs interpreted through the lens of "Bounce Protocol," shall we say, and I saw that every pathway, and I've never talked about this publicly, but I'm letting people know exactly what I went through, 'cause I always, I always practice what I preach. I had burned out every metabolic pathway that you need to have in order to withstand cold exposure. I had really severe issues burning fat. I didn't have adequate tyrosine levels. I didn't have adequate cofactors to turn that tyrosine into thyroid hormone, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine. I stopped doing cold exposure and I started using the Balance Protocol, supplement protocol. Protocol, really, and I repleted all those levels of nutrients and saw really amazing improvements in my overall level of— of my overall feelings of— in my emotions, my energy levels, my sleep. And it blew me away because I realized, wow, light and cold do not explain— it cannot be used to treat everything. You've got to make sure that the patient has the right biochemical substrates in order to use the electromagnetic energies in their environment in a positive way. And since then, I've found so many examples of people who just didn't realize what they were doing that was creating problems, like people having high mercury levels because they're eating too much tuna, people who have really severe magnesium deficiencies because no one's ever checked their magnesium, people who have, you know, undiagnosed copper, zinc, B6, B12 deficiencies just because people aren't doing the right testing or aren't using the right supplements. And that's where, you know, now my approach is so comprehensive that really things like cold exposure and more advanced phototherapy like UV light, which I, I still use a lot actually, are actually pretty far down the pipe for any of my patients.

Hmm. Now I'm very curious about this protocol that you just referred to with, with the tyrosine, etc. What did you say that protocol was called?

So when I treat patients nutritionally, I use balanced protocol. And so Dr. Beck, my clinical mentor who I've alluded to, he has a protocol based on his interpretation of nutritional labs, uh, to replete people of different nutrients. And it's a full spectrum. There's really no nutrient that we don't address using this protocol.

Okay, got it. And is— did you say that protocol has an actual title if people wanted to look it up, or if I could link to it somewhere? It's just called the Balanced Protocol, and that one's by Anthony Beck?

Yep, Dr. Anthony Beck.

Okay, cool. And so that's basically just like a, uh, lab testing combined with replenishment of certain nutrients?

—right, but also very importantly, a comprehensive approach to the environment. And, you know, I spent my whole career trying to find what I would describe as the holy grail of health and wellness. You know, what absolutely is the protocol that gets people better? And there's so many things out there, and it's— frankly, it's exhausting, right? I mean, I'm 32 years old. I got interested in health and wellness when I was 15, and it's been pretty pedal to the metal. I've been obsessed with this for that long. Wrong. And I was looking all along for a protocol that addressed everything because like I've mentioned before, if you get your nutrition totally right but you're living in the wrong light environment, it's gonna create problems. If you're living in the perfect light environment with a good nutrition but you don't have the right EMF environment, you can still get sick. If you're breathing wrong, if your HVAC system's got an infestation of mold, so if you're not addressing all these different factors, you don't get good results. And it led me to from— from moving away from the time for money model of medicine where you're dealing with people in this way, it's like, "OK, we got an hour here today and we got an hour next month, an hour next month," to this more concierge retainer model where I just say, "Look, if I'm going to get you a good result, I need to have a lot of time with you over a period of months because we're going to get into every aspect of your environment and we're going to turn over every rock under which some problem could be hiding so that we can really get you better." Okay, got it.

Now, you also mentioned breathwork, and I'm curious what that actually looks like. Well, specifically for you, are you doing breathwork on a daily basis, or how are you weaving breathwork into your own life?

Breathwork is something I do on a daily basis, yes. And I've studied this with Patrick McKeown, whose work I got turned on to by Dr. Beck. And I got into the work of a Russian physician named Vladimir Buteyko, whose basic premise was that a lot of disease is caused by chronic hyperventilation. And I immediately seized on his hypothesis and went back to all the patients I'd seen over all the years who were sick, and I realized the sickest patients at the youngest ages were breathing quickly and rapidly. And this goes back to stuff I'd read because of my fascination in traditional Chinese medicine and traditional Chinese martial art. The ancient Taoists and Chinese scholars noted that the animals that lived the shortest took the most shallow and rapid breaths. And the deeper and the longer your breaths and the fewer breaths per minute you take, the longer you live, period, end of story. This is why the bowhead whale is the longest living mammal. This is why the Greenland shark is the longest living vertebrate. They have a very low rate of oxygen exposure, and they also have optimized their oxygen physiology to maximize its use for production of energy rather than the production of free radicals that create cellular damage and oxidative stress. That lead to cellular senescence, aging, cancer, et cetera, et cetera. That's also why whales have an extremely low rate of cancer, which I find fascinating. And so when I approach breathwork, it's from the perspective of, okay, breathing, we gotta fix your breathing mechanics, nasal breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, particularly if you wanna activate the vagus nerve. You wanna be taking deeper breaths but over longer periods of time. And, you know, box breathing or combat breathing or— is one of the techniques that I'll use, measuring the control pause. But the bottom line is basically I want to get people's respiratory systems back into optimal breathing mechanics because that optimizes oxygen delivery around the body. It optimizes the immune system. It optimizes all these things, and it's amazed me to see illnesses and diseases just melt away when I just got people to fix their breathing mechanisms. Yeah, yeah.

And, I've been interviewing a lot of these folks like James Nestor and Patrick and a guy named Niraj, the so-called Renegade Pharmacist, and have been kind of a student of breathwork. And, like you, love freediving, and I've taken my freediving cert course and everything like that. But, of course, when it comes down to the practical nitty-gritty like the boots on the streets of, well, how do I find the time to do this? How do I to, you know, put it into my daily life. For me personally, I do a lot when I'm walking. I do a lot of breathwork practice when I'm walking just because I'm in nature. I'm getting the sunlight that we talked about, all the near-infrared and the UVA and UVB exposure and the full spectrum and the fresh air and, you know, all that jazz. But the, um, one, one thing I've been doing lately, uh, to kind of combine both of Patrick McCowan's principles on carbon dioxide retention, right, not being an over-breather, and even kind of stabilizing the nervous system by exhaling for a longer period of time than one inhales, with the idea of doing a better job at mobilizing the psoas and improving mindfulness of diaphragmatic use when, when breathing. So one thing I've been doing lately for my walks, and I don't even know if I've shared this on a podcast recently, although I did an Instagram post about it, is there's this thing called a breath belt, which is kind of like a, a tight belt, almost like a corset that you can wear, that you can put a couple of lacrosse balls into so that you're mobilizing the psoas and activating the glutes as you walk. And it's almost impossible not to breathe diaphragmatically when you're wearing that. But then I combine that with this other small, very simple device called a Relaxator, which was developed by another breath expert named Anders Ohlsson. And it's a small device, almost like a whistle, that you put in your mouth that resists your exhale and also has no inhale function, meaning you must breathe through your nose and then take a longer exhale. So, I can go for a walk wearing the Breath Belt and then I'll have the Relaxator in my mouth. And a half-hour walk like that, something as simple as that, assuming you don't have to talk on the phone or anything like that, For me, that's been a really, really cool way for me to be able to practice a lot of both the biomechanical and the physiological aspects of breathwork, but kind of have it— for me, if I've got a tool or a toy that I can use, it makes it a lot easier for me than just saying, "Whatever, I'm going to breathe through my nose, take a longer exhale, and focus on my diaphragm while I'm on this walk." When I'm putting on a breath belt or using a Relaxator, it sounds gimmicky, but it does kind of forced me to think a little bit more intensively about the way I'm breathing and some of this carbon dioxide tolerance and less breathing as championed by the guy like Patrick McCallen like you mentioned.

That is a really interesting way to combine a lot of those things. I assume you're walking around in nature. Do you get a lot of weird looks? I assume you're— are you in the woods?

Yeah. I live out in the sticks. I'm just walking on old farm roads and barely anybody cares. So, it's been okay for me. And occasionally, when I do go to a big city like whatever, LA, and I'm walking through Santa Monica like that, I mean, I don't know, people, we always think everybody's watching us. This is the classic, "I'm at the gym, I'm embarrassed about my body, et cetera." Nobody's really looking at you. They're all focused on their own thing. So, it's not something I worry about too much. Anyways, though, that's really fantastic and refreshing to hear from a physician who's optimizing external environment with some of these things. Like cold and light and breathing, but then also combining it with what it sounds like some of the, um, some of more of the, the quantified laboratory testing based on, on some of this work that you've learned from Anthony Beck. I may have to eventually get Anthony back on the show to talk about this Balance Protocol and take a deeper dive into that. But, but it's possibly related to another question I wanted to ask you about what kind of nutrition or, or dietary approach that you utilize with yourself or with your patients? You know, what's your approach when it comes to— when it comes to eating?

So number one is we gotta figure out if there's anything that somebody absolutely cannot eat. And this gets into the whole, you know, elimination diet thing, which a lot of people don't know the history behind, which I find deeply informative about how we should use elimination diets. So elimination diets, you know, arose in the 1920s, '30s, '40s, not actually as a therapeutic tool, but actually as a way of studying diseases like anemia. And so I'm fascinated by like carnivore, and I wanna make something really clear before I go on. I am so happy for people who eliminate something from their diet and get an amazing health improvement, but I've had patients who eliminated meat who got better, and I've had patients who eliminated plants who got better, and so I'm not, I'm an agnostic when it comes to saying, this food is bad for people. That's the number one premise for me is there's no food that's gonna absolutely, you know, kill you right now on the spot and some of them may be poison over long periods of time but we gotta ask questions like why, okay? Number one reason is for there to be an immunological reaction to that food and that's one of the first things I gotta figure out with people. Are they actually having a genuine immune reaction to a food? What testing I do in order to determine that depends upon their exact presentation because food allergy testing is so fraught with false positives and false negatives, and sometimes people are reacting to foods and they're blaming, say, the gluten, but what about the dough conditioner or the artificial flavoring or the artificial preservative? I mean, the number of things we put into our food these days is absolutely dizzying, and one of the paradoxes in immunology that I don't think conventional immunologists really appreciate adequately is that the immune system seems to be able to have weird reactions to all kinds of things in ways that we can't explain, right? And you'll have people who have sky-high levels of immunoglobulin to a food who don't react to it, and some people have no immunoglobulin reaction to a food and obviously react to it. So I, I do test for people's food allergies in order to figure out what they actually have to absolutely avoid and also Why? And then I wanna figure out, okay, what's their nutritional profile looking like? Because they may have too many saturated fatty acids. They may have too many omega-3s. They may have not enough B6. They may not have enough arginine. And then I'm tailoring their diet and trying to come up with foods that are gonna supply them most with the nutrients that they don't have. One of my favorites, because I see a lot of this, is chia and flaxseeds. So chia and flaxseeds are rich in arginine. They're also rich in omega-3 fatty acids. Many people don't have enough omega-3 fatty acids.— I also have a lot of patients come to me who have gut issues. The— when you soak chia and flaxseeds, they get this nice mucilage that comes out of them that can be very healing and soothing to the gut. So what do I tell them to do? Soak the chia and flaxseeds, put them in a blender, blend them up. That way you absorb the omega-3s, you get the arginine, and you get the healing properties of the mucilage coming through your gut lining. So that's just one example of how I do this, but it's tailored to everything. You know, because let's say somebody has got a B12 deficiency, but they've also got an excess of zinc. Well, I don't want them to take— eat oysters because if they eat oysters, they're gonna get the B12, which is great, but they're also gonna get all the zinc and they're already overloaded. Hmm. And let's say that they've got a vitamin A deficiency, but they've also got a high copper level. Well, if I give them beef liver to fix their vitamin A deficiency, I'm gonna make their copper excess worse with the beef liver. I just got labs back on a patient who has low vitamin A. And a super high copper level and I was like, "What are you eating?" She's like, "A lot of liverwurst." I'm like, "Stop it, knock off the liverwurst." So you get all these constellations when you do comprehensive testing that inform you of, I think, and at this point an undeniable clinical reality which is nobody's the same. They all need to have their diet tailored to them and I now run the test that I use, the Nutraval Plasma, every 3 months. I'm getting ready to do another one and like I said, I've been amazed by the results of really dialing in my diet based on my lab testing. It's much more satisfying and efficacious than anything I've done heretofore in my clinical career.

I recently finished a book, uh, by, uh, Nick Gonzalez called Nutrition and the Autonomic Nervous System. And, uh, I, I think I saw an article or heard you mention that at some point. And it's based on this idea that, you know, it's too simplistic to say that everybody's like, you a sympathetic nervous system person or a parasympathetically driven person, but the gist of it was essentially that, you know, people who are more sympathetically driven tend to become even more sympathetically driven when they eat very sympathetically stimulating foods, such as particularly, let's say, like a carnivorous or paleo meat-based approach. And therefore, plants and fruits and vegetables seem to kind of balance those people out, whereas people who are more parasympathetically sympathetically driven might need, you know, more stimulus from something like, uh, like meat, for example. And, you know, I'm curious, having heard you mention that, if that's an approach that you use at all, this kind of like nervous system testing and customization of diet based on someone's parasympathetic versus sympathetic status.

So I heard about Nick and his work, and for people who don't know, Nick Gonzalez was a medical doctor in New York City who used enzymes and dietary modifications in order to treat very advanced late-stage cancer. And a lot of people have accused him of pseudoscience and quackery and whatever. I heard about him through the Weston A. Price Foundation. I actually wrote him a letter, went and shouted at his clinic, shook the hands of his patients who he'd saved, many of whom just said, "Look, this guy saved my life. I would have had to have my prostate cut out or my pancreas removed and wouldn't have had any quality of life if it weren't for this man." So I really believe in what Nick did. I've read his books, I've talked to his patients, and I— for a long list of reasons, I didn't end up working with him, but I thought about it very strongly. And I absolutely still use this. Nick's approach was predicated on very sophisticated interpretation of hair mineral analysis to get to the bottom of what somebody's metabolism was and what their autonomic nervous system balance was. And without getting into too much of the weeds on what the autonomic nervous system is, he basically wanted to give people the foods that were gonna balance their neurotransmitters so that they functioned optimally. With the reason— one of the reasons I didn't just— I decided not to work for him is that as I got out of my training, I became aware of all this research on light and EMF and so on and so forth. And I looked back on my experience shadowing him, and I looked back at his office. It was in a New York building with very little visible light that was kind of dark in terms of the tones in the room. And he didn't know anything about light, didn't teach his patients anything about light therapy. And he ended up dying very young, and some people, you know, imply foul play. I don't want to get into conspiracy theories about that, but I looked at the guy in front of me and I thought, there's something this guy's missing as far as his health, because he was overweight and he was balding and he didn't seem like he was very happy. And I became convinced that what he was missing was what I was— what I ended up ultimately researching with light and breathwork and all this stuff. But he still managed to cure people's cancers using diet and enzymes. And if you can do that, whoa, what can you do when you integrate light and EMF and breathwork and getting the right water and all these other things that I now work on with my patients? And so his approach was using the autonomic nervous system, which is actually something that we do pay a lot of attention to in Balance Protocol, which is one of the reasons why I love it, but it's only one of many factors. That being said, I've had patients come to me who were very strongly parasympathetic dominant, and I told them that they needed to have red meat and legumes in their diet in order to feel normal. And they'd call me back in 2 weeks and say, "Dr. Stillman, I followed your advice. I was on the verge of tears last week for no apparent reason. I sat down, I had a cheeseburger, I felt so much better." And I've had patients on the other side of the spectrum who are sympathetic dominant come to me and say, "You know, I just didn't feel right after eating all these heavy foods. I was trying to go carnivore or whatever and it just wasn't working for me, and I followed your advice, Dr. Stillman, and I had a salad with some light, you know, protein, and I felt so much better." There's a reality to this that is so powerful and so underappreciated in the alternative medical community. I'm just so grateful to be aware of it because it gets me such good results.

Yeah. Anecdotally, I've certainly seen that there's something to it. I ask many of my incoming clients about how they feel from a high-fat, high-protein meal versus more vegetable-based meal, when they're hungriest, and try to do a little bit of old-school question-based metabolic typing. And for myself, you know, I, for example, I just did a 5-day juice fast, uh, and I am, I'm, I'm really not, um, a big proponent of like a pure vegan or plant-based diet, but did that fast to experiment with it, you know, just a, you know, a little bit of immersive journalism, a little bit of sheer curiosity about how the body feels on something like that. And my wife just crushed it, like great energy levels, in the flow, creative, wonderful brain function, slept like a baby, and I was a wreck. And my HRV plummeted and all I could think about was ribeye for 5 days in a row. And I feel just absolutely fantastic on meat. And the interesting thing is even though a lot of people think of me as a hard-charging, high-achieving, very sympathetically driven person, if you actually look, you take a deeper dive into, for example, my HRV metrics, my heart rate variability metrics, I have one app that I use called NatureBeat. That allows me to put on a Bluetooth-enabled heart rate monitor and look at both the low frequency and high frequency of HRV, so I can see the parasympathetic and sympathetic balance. My, my parasympathetic score, or my high frequency HRV score, is always through the roof, meaning I'm a very parasympathetically dominant person. And therefore, the idea that high intake of plants and fruits and vegetables and produce kind of leaves me a little sluggish with energy and yet one bite of meat and it's like lifeblood surging through my body, lends a little bit of credence, at least anecdotally for me, to this idea of looking at your sympathetic-parasympathetic balance and then kind of choosing a diet if you tend to be really skewed in one direction or the other that might allow for energy stabilization based on those metrics.

Absolutely. And I've had such, such profound experiences with this in my practice that I couldn't go back to practicing without it. Yup.

And are you using any type of equipment to test the nervous system or are you using things like questionnaires? It's a combination of—

and I actually don't integrate any questionnaires because I have a lot of ADHD if you hadn't noticed. And so I actually listened to your podcast with the author of Driven, which blew my mind.

I was like— Doug Brackmann?

Yeah. I was like, "This is me." And so I just can't focus on the questionnaire for long enough, besides which I don't really care about all the answers to the questionnaire. I care about getting enough answers to be sure of what the patient is and then I make a recommendation and then if my recommendation gets the result that I expect, it confirms my hypothesis and we just go from there. But I do— the lab testing that I do, the NutrEval Plasma has markers for dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine so you can infer from those levels what somebody's autonomic nervous system is doing. It gets a little tricky when people get out on the— pretty far out on the axis but that's That's something to really take care of in an individual clinical context.

Got it. Got it. Now, I just had a couple kind of fringe questions I wanted to ask you, and one is going to backpedal a little bit and be related to light. We talked about environmental sources of light, but what about internal sources of light? I've talked with guys like Matt Maruca, who is also an understudy of Jack's and a friend of mine who has a blue light blocking company called Raw. And for me personally, if I'm getting up and turning on the lights and using the bathroom at night or getting up early in the morning, I've always got his red lenses on. And that's my hack related to your talk about switching on one of these HUGO lamps at night. I just flip on whatever lights are around and put on his red light glasses, for example. But totally unrelated to the glasses, one thing that he talked about was the capability of the human body itself to produce light. And that's an interesting fact if it is true that we can measure the amount of light produced by the body or specifically by the mitochondria. And it's interesting that the body is producing some form of photonic energy. But do you think there's any application there from a health standpoint or anything interesting that you found when it comes to the actual photonic production of light by the body itself? Oh, without a doubt.

It's actually interesting that you're bringing this up right now because I was just looking in the literature for papers on measuring light emission from mitochondria, but it's very hard to measure light emission from the human body at a cellular level because cells deeper than your skin are going to be emitting light that passes through other cells. So how does that change the wavelengths of the light, right? And our bodies are really built to try and retain a lot of this light. And then of course they have very complicated mechanisms to get rid of heat if you're overheating, sweating, breathing through your mouth, all these things you can do in order to get rid of excess heat. But there's no question that mitochondria emit light, and the paper that I cite is a paper by Nick Lane that we can include a link to about how hot mitochondria seem to run based on our most recent data. He suggests that mitochondria may be optimized for a temperature of 50°C, which is 10 degrees at least higher than body temperature, which when you step back and think about it is unbelievable. We're talking about an organelle within the cell operating at 10 degrees higher than the rest of the cell. That's amazing. And it tells you something about the heat production in the mitochondria. And this is something about physics that people don't appreciate is that the— like, light is a form of energy, and so infrared light that we sense from the sun or from a light bulb, that's heat. We perceive that as heat. They're not totally equivalent because there's— and that gets into some nitty-gritty physics that I won't pretend to know all the details of. But basically mitochondria emit an enormous amount of infrared light that's created as they combust substrates in the citric acid cycle and as they transfer protons and electrons along the electron transport chain. And that gets into some very complicated physiology with uncoupling proteins and deuterium and, you know, electron chain transport and hacks with CoQ10 and methylene and blue and all this stuff that the biohackers get into and that they're fascinated by, fundamentally what they're doing aside from the biochemical realities is they're also changing the light that's coming out of the mitochondria. It's very well established in the biophotonics literature that cells emit UVC light in order to drive cell division. We've known that for 100 years. It just isn't taught to doctors and biochemists, and so they have no idea. My citation for that is Roland van book, uh, Light Shaping Life. And that's why you'll see in a lot of my social media, my, my tagline's often, light shapes life, period. How is it shaping yours? Because it's a question I'll ask my patients because it's such a powerful one.

Yeah, well, it's interesting for two reasons. I think this idea of the body being able to produce light— like, we know the mitochondrial matrix is really densely packed with proteins, and the, the conformational states of the proteins are stabilized by the water within the mitochondrial matrix, which if structured is, you know, a little less free to move but needs to move when a protein kind of changes its shape. And so the ability of the light produced by the mitochondria to be able to properly kind of like vibrationally excite these water molecules could be enhanced if the water within one's cells are structured, meaning, you know, lower amounts of deuterium, present from, you know, mitigation of herbicide and pesticide consumption, or lower intake of starchy compounds, or even consumption of this, you know, newfangled deuterium-depleted water, um, or even, you know, the, the higher consumption of minerals or of structured water. I, I have a hunch, and again, I've seen no studies on this, that the ability of a lot of these proteins to be properly folded in response to what's going on in the mitochondria could be enhanced by ensuring that your hydration is really more of like a deuterium-depleted mineral-enhanced structured water type of, type of, um, you know, approach when it comes to hydration. And then the other thing is that if, you know, like water and heat and light is interacting with the outer membrane of the mitochondria, that would by definition mean that the light produced by the mitochondria would be better able to produce a lot of the heat production across these membranes if the membranes were structured properly, which would come down to the— a real mitigation of fats that might occur in the cardiolipin component of the mitochondrial membrane, specifically like high intake of omega-6 fatty acids or vegetable-based fatty acids. And, you know, higher intake of perhaps some of the monounsaturates or some of the omega-3 fatty acids in combination with adequate hydration, specifically in terms of like minerals, deuterium depletion, etc., could cause the body to respond to the light produced by the mitochondria, specifically from a metabolic standpoint, in a very favorable way. So I suspect that there are ways that you can kind of like hack your ability to be able to, to harness the light produced by the mitochondria in a really helpful way metabolically.

I entirely agree. And most of the therapeutics that I wield have something to do with balancing out the mitochondria so that they can generate that light optimally. Because when you look at how the TCA cycle and electron chain transport work, if you're missing any component, you're gonna kick off metabolites in excess or, or overconsume metabolites to try and feed pathways that are deficient. You're gonna end up with imbalances in organic acids, say, and then this can— from this you can infer what vitamins or minerals the patient is deficient in. And one of the most profound experiences has been getting people who have already got a pristine light environment on the right nutritional protocol for them because, you know, like magnesium, for example, necessary for energy generation in the cell. It actually complexes with ATP and a whole lot of water molecules around it in order to do its work. And so when you don't have magnesium in the cell, energy generation is going to be impaired no matter what your levels of of other substrates, amino acids, phosphate, let alone your light environment. So we've got to get the right components into the mitochondria for it to be the most efficient and effective heat engine to drive life. Hmm.

Yeah, it's fascinating. Now there's obviously so many things when it comes to the environment, and we actually, we, we did, we did a good job touching on several of them, you know, briefly on air quality, but then also water, obviously, and light, of course. We talked about EMF a bit. We talked about food a bit. We didn't touch too much on sound, although I believe that both sound pollution as well as the introduction of more healing wavelengths of sound is a real crucial part of the environment that's also often neglected. And so, this whole idea of air, water, light, sound, EMF, food, all of these environmental considerations, I'm just, I'm so impressed that, that you're working those into the protocol of the patients who you're working with. And I wish more doctors would take that kind of stuff into account. But I'm also curious if there's any other kind of like non-negotiables we haven't yet had a chance to discuss that for you or for your patients you kind of consider really necessary for being optimally healthy, like the kind of things that you're just like, yeah, if you're not doing this, you're, you're totally not taking advantage of either some low-hanging fruit or something that are— that's really going to move the dial for you from a health or an energy standpoint.

It's funny that you mentioned that because I have a whiteboard over there where I'll put down things that I need to think more about, and it says choose gratitude every day. And when people— so many people come to me who've got a toxic mindset, and it's been poisoned by different people, you know, their family, their friends. So often the people in our lives who we are most attached to are actually poisoning our efforts to get well with their negativity. And if I'm encountering somebody and I'm working with somebody and everything I'm doing to fix their physical reality, to optimize their health, is running up against, you know, resistance and they're not getting better, then we have to look at, well, what's going on inside their head? Because thoughts truly can create disease. And this is something that really became apparent to me as I dealt with EMF mitigation and patients who are electrosensitive because they get into this really terrible sort of spiral where they may have real sensitivity or at least perceived sensitivity to these things, which of course we can never prove in any meaningful way, right? But then they have this constant worry and rumination on it where they're constantly worrying about it. And every cell tower they see, every time they pick up their cell phone, they're getting this stress response. And so they end up with this really negative mindset about life and about about society and about what's going to happen to them, and, and they can get kind of hopeless. And one of the things that's amazed me in my clinical career is the best results are obtained always by the patient who has the most hope, the most faith, the most positive mindset. And so it's non-negotiable for me for the patient to have a positive mindset and expectation that they're going to get better. This is something that I think a lot of doctors shy away from because they think it's the placebo effect And I just— and that was certainly how I was— it was treated in my training, which is, oh, we're not gonna talk to the patient about their mindset. We're not gonna talk to them about what goes on in their head. And part of that is because I trained in internal medicine. We're concerned about the body, its vital organs, and not so much the brain. We left that to the psychiatrists. But the psychiatrists very often pay lip service to it and don't do anything more than that. And for me, it just became a— now I consider myself a mercenary to whatever gets the patient better. If it provides me therapeutic leverage, I will consider it, I will study it, and I will use it. And that includes enlisting the patient's brain in getting them better. I will do everything possible with that because the placebo effect is free and you can make it yourself. So why wouldn't you use it? Mm-hmm.

Yeah, it's kind of funny. I'm writing an article right now on a book that I just read called Anatomy of an Illness by Norman Cousins, who had a pretty debilitating case of ankylosing spondylitis and, and a very painful collagenous disease. And this was actually back in the '70s. He wound up curing himself with laughter. Actually, it was laughter, and I think he also had some high-dose vitamin C as part of his program as well, like intravenous vitamin C. But vitamin C aside, it's actually a really fantastic read about how laughter and humor is so important for healing. He was watching Candid Camera and a bunch of other comic films and self-inducing manic bouts of laughter similar to one might get from modern-day laughing yoga or stand-up comedy. And, that's kind of an interesting twist on Bruce Lipton's whole biology of belief just using laughter. But, it's super interesting. I may have finished that article before this podcast is actually released, but that's just been a super interesting book when it comes to just one single emotion and the effect that that can have on the body. And, in this case, just laughing your ass off at something.

My thoughts on this were shaped by papers that I read by a Japanese researcher whose last name is Kamada. His first name escapes me. He wrote papers on the effects of different energies and frequencies on the human immune system as measured by skin prick testing and a variety of other metrics. He also looked at oxytocin levels and melatonin levels, and he looked at them given different emotional stimuli. So for example, he did one paper where he measured the allergic responses of the skin in patients, one group of which was exposed to exposed to Beethoven and the other one was exposed to Mozart. Mozart reduced the allergic response. Skeptics are going to say these are too small-scale. They haven't adequately controlled for other variables. I get it. These are small-scale studies. They haven't been replicated in large, robust ways, but the more you look at these mechanisms, the more you see that there is so much behind them vis-à-vis, you know, laughter, release of oxytocin from the posterior pituitary. This results in a cascade of effects. Through your hormones that results in a cascade of effects in your immune system. Diseases like ankylosing spondylitis are strongly linked to a combination of immune dysregulation and then these potentially chronic occult infections. If you can influence the immune system to finally clear the infection, maybe you can make the disease go away. So there's all these links that you see in the literature, but academics in particular just wanna say, "Oh, these are interesting associations. More studies are needed." Guys like me say, let's take this information, act empirically, and get the patient better. And if that means telling the patient to have their wife tickle them every day for a week and a half and see what happens, what do you have to lose? Worst thing that can happen is you get better.

Tickle therapy. I like it. That could catch on. You know, you, you wanna make sure that your malpractice insurance is really dialed in though before you start opening up your office for tickle therapy. I'll just warn you. All right. Sounds good. All right, folks. Well, I'm Ben Greenfield along with Dr. Leland Stillman. Have an amazing week. Hit subscribe, leave a ranking, leave a review if you got a little extra time. It means way more than you might think. Thank you so much.